1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 55, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 55, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The dependence of shear‐wave splitting in fractured reservoirs on the properties of the filling fluid may provide a useful attribute for identifying reservoir fluids. If the direction of wave propagation is not perpendicular or parallel to the plane of fracturing, the wave polarized in the plane perpendicular to the fractures is a quasi‐shear mode, and therefore the shear‐wave splitting will be sensitive to the fluid bulk modulus. The magnitude of this sensitivity depends upon the extent to which fluid pressure can equilibrate between pores and fractures during the period of the deformation. In this paper, we use the anisotropic Gassmann equations and existing formulations for the excess compliance due to fracturing to estimate the splitting of vertically propagating shear waves as a function of the fluid modulus for a porous medium with a single set of dipping fractures and with two conjugate fracture sets, dipping with opposite dips to the vertical. This is achieved using two alternative approaches. In the first approach, it is assumed that the deformation taking place is quasi‐static: that is, the frequency of the elastic disturbance is low enough to allow enough time for fluid to flow between both the fractures and the pore space throughout the medium. In the second approach, we assume that the frequency is low enough to allow fluid flow between a fracture set and the surrounding pore space, but high enough so that there is not enough time during the period of the elastic disturbance for fluid flow between different fracture sets to occur. It is found that the second approach yields a much stronger dependence of shear‐wave splitting on the fluid modulus than the first approach. This is a consequence of the fact that at higher wave frequencies there is not enough time for fluid pressure to equilibrate and therefore the elastic properties of the fluid have a greater effect on the magnitude of the shear‐wave splitting.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00593.x
2007-04-13
2024-04-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00593.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AuriaultJ.L. and BoutinC.1994. Deformable porous media with double porosity III. Acoustics. Transport in Porous Media14, 143–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BakulinA., GrechkaV. and TsvankinI.2000. Estimation of fracture parameters from reflection seismic data – Part III: Fractured models with monoclinic symmetry. Geophysics65, 1818–1830.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BiotM.A.1962. Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media. Journal of Applied Physics33, 1482–1498.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BrajanovskiM., GurevichB. and SchoenbergM.2005. A model for P‐wave attenuation and dispersion in a porous medium permeated by aligned fractures. Geophysical Journal International163, 372–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BrownR.J.S. and KorringaJ.1975. On the dependence of elastic properties of a porous rock on the compressibility of the pore fluid. Geophysics40, 608–616.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CardonaR.2002. Two theories for fluid substitution in porous rocks with aligned cracks. 72nd SEG Meeting, Salt Lake City , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 173–176.
  7. CardonaR., BatzleM. and DavisT.2001. Shear‐wave velocity dependence on fluid saturation. 71st SEG Meeting, San Antonio , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1712–1715.
  8. ChapmanM.2003. Frequency‐dependent anisotropy due to meso‐scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity. Geophysical Prospecting51, 369–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CrampinS.1985. Evaluation of anisotropy by shear‐wave splitting. Geophysics50, 142–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GalvinR.J. and GurevichB.2006. Interaction of an elastic wave with a circular crack in a fluid‐saturated porous medium. Applied Physics Letters88, 061918.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GassmannF.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahresschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GrechkaV. and KachanovM.2006. Effective elasticity of fractured rocks. The Leading Edge25, 152–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GrechkaV., VasconcelosI. and KachanovM.2006. The influence of crack shape on the effective elasticity of fractured rocks. Geophysics71, D153–D160.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GuestS., Van Der KolkC. and PottersH.1998. The effect of fracture filling fluids on shear‐wave propagation. 68th SEG Meeting, New Orleans , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 948–951.
  15. GurevichB.2003. Elastic properties of saturated porous rocks with aligned fractures. Journal of Applied Geophysics54, 203–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HelbigK.1994. Foundations of Anisotropy for Exploration Seismics . Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HoenigA.1979. Elastic moduli of a non‐randomly cracked body. International Journal of Solids and Structures15, 137–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HsuC. and SchoenbergM.1993. Elastic waves through a simulated fractured medium. Geophysics58, 964–977.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HudsonJ.A.1980. Overall properties of a cracked solid. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society88, 371–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HudsonJ.A.1981. Wave speeds and attenuation of elastic waves in material containing cracks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society64, 133–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HudsonJ.A. and CrampinS.2003. Comment on: ‘The 3D shear experiment over the Natih field in Oman: the effects of fracture‐filling fluids on shear propagation’ by C.M. van der Kolk, W.S. Guest and J.H.H.M. Potters.Geophysical Prospecting51, 365–368.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HudsonJ.A., LiuE. and CrampinS.1996. The mechanical properties of materials with interconnected cracks and pores. Geophysical Journal International124, 105–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HudsonJ.A., PointerT. and LiuE.2001. Effective‐medium theories for fluid‐saturated materials with aligned cracks. Geophysical Prospecting49, 509–522.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Der KolkC., GuestW.S. and PottersJ.H.H.M.2001. The 3D shear experiment over the Natih field in Oman: the effect of fracture‐filling fluids on shear propagation. Geophysical Prospecting49, 179–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MaultzschS., ChapmanM., LiuE. and LiX.2003. Modelling frequency‐dependent seismic anisotropy in fluid‐saturated rock with aligned fractures: implication of fracture size estimation from anisotropic measurements. Geophysical Prospecting51, 381–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.1998. The Rock Physics Handbook . Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. NelsonR.A.2001. Geologic Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs . Gulf. Professional Publishing, Boston .
    [Google Scholar]
  28. NyeJ.F.1985. Physical Properties of Crystals . Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. O'ConnellR.J. and BudianskyB.1974. Seismic velocities in dry and saturated cracked solids. Journal of Geophysical Research79, 5412–5426.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. PointerT., LiuE. and HudsonJ.A.2000. Seismic wave propagation in cracked porous media. Geophysical Journal International142, 199–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PrideS.R. and BerrymanJ.G.2003. Linear dynamics of double‐porosity dual‐permeability materials I. Governing equations and acoustic attenuation. Physical Review of E68, 036603.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ReissL.H.1980. The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Fractured Formations . Editions Technip, Paris .
    [Google Scholar]
  33. RiceJ.R. and ClearyM.P.1976. Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid‐saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents. Review ofs of Geophysics and Space Physics14, 227–241.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. SayersC.M.2002. Fluid‐dependent shear‐wave splitting in fractured media. Geophysical Prospecting50, 393–401.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SayersC.M. and KachanovM.1995. Microcrack‐induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research100, 4149–4156.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. SchoenbergM.1980. Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interfaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society America68, 1516–1521.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. SchoenbergM. and DoumaJ.1988. Elastic wave propagation in media with parallel fractures and aligned cracks. Geophysical Prospecting36, 571–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. SchoenbergM. and SayersC.M.1995. Seismic anisotropy of fractured rock. Geophysics60, 204–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. ThomsenL.1995. Elastic anisotropy due to aligned cracks in porous rock. Geophysical Prospecting43, 805–829.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. TodS.R.2001. The effects on seismic waves of interconnected nearly aligned cracks. Geophysical Journal International146, 249–263.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00593.x
Loading
Fluid‐dependent shear‐wave splitting in a poroelastic medium with conjugate fracture sets
Geophysical Prospecting 55, 333 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00593.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00593.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00593.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error