1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 55, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 55, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The determination of clay content in near‐surface formations is crucial for geotechnical, hydrogeological and oil‐contamination studies. We have developed a technique for estimating clay content that consists of the minimization of the difference between the theoretically calculated and measured soil resistivities as a function of water salinity. To calculate the resistivity, we used a model that takes into account the electrochemical processes in the clay micropores. The experimental measurements of soil resistivity were performed on soil samples, completely saturated by brines at different concentrations of NaCl salt in the range 0.6–100 g/l, to obtain the resistivity versus salinity curve. The parameters obtained with this curve inversion are the clay content, the total porosity and the cation exchange capacity. To verify the new technique, we determined clay concentrations of artificial mixtures of calibrated sand and clay. The relative mean error in the clay content does not exceed 20% for a 5% fitting error of the resistivity versus salinity curves. Such evaluations allow the correct separation of the main lithological groups (sand, sandy loam, loam, and light, medium and heavy clay).

We applied this technique to estimate the petrophysical parameters of soils (clay content, porosity and cation exchange capacity) at various sites in Mexico. The results improved the interpretation of the vertical electrical soundings, the lithological soil characterization and the delineation of oil‐contaminated areas.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00599.x
2007-02-12
2024-04-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00599.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdel AalG.Z., AtekwanaE.A., SlaterL.D. and AtekwanaE.A.2004. Effects of microbial processes on electrolytic and interfacial electrical properties of unconsolidated sediments. Geophysical Research Letters31 (12) (L12505), DOI: 10.1029/2004GL020030.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BeklemishevA.V.1963. Measures and Units of Physical Values . Fizmatgiz, Moscow (in Russian).
     [Google Scholar]
  3. BussianA.E.1983. Electrical conductance in a porous medium. Geophysics48, 1258–1268.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ClavierC., CoatesG. and DumanoirJ.1984. Theoretical and experimental bases for the dual‐water model for interpretation of shaly sands. SPE Journal, April, 153–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FridrikhsbergD.A.1984. A Course of Colloid Chemistry . Khimija, Moscow (in Russian).
     [Google Scholar]
  6. GoltsmanF.M.1971. Statistical Models of Interpretation . Moscow (in Russian).
     [Google Scholar]
  7. JohnsonD.L. and SenP.N.1988. Dependence of the conductivity of a porous medium on electrolyte conductivity. Physical Review B37, 3502–3510.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KleinK. and SantamarinaJ.C.1997. Methods for broad‐band dielectric permittivity measurements (soil‐water mixtures, 5 Hz to 1.3 GHz). ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal20, 168–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KleinK.A. and SantamarinaJ.C.2003. Electrical conductivity in soils: Underlying phenomena. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics8, 263–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KnightR.J.1991. Hysteresis in the electrical resistivity of partially saturated sandstones. Geophysics56, 2139–2147.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KroitG.R.1955. Science of Colloids . Innostrannaya Literatura, Moscow (in Russian).
     [Google Scholar]
  12. De LimaO.A.L. and SharmaM.M.1990. A grain conductivity approach to shaly sandstones. Geophysics55, 1347–1356.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MarionD. and NurA.1991. Pore‐filling material and its effect on velocity in rocks. Geophysics56, 225–230.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MarionD., NurA., YinH. and HanD.1992. Compressional velocity and porosity in sand‐clay mixtures. Geophysics57, 554–563.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McGearyR.K.1961. Mechanical packing of spherical particles. Journal of the American Ceramic Society44, 513–522.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. RevilA., CathlesL.M., LoshS. and NunnJ.A.1998. Electrical conductivity in shaly sands with geophysical applications. Journal of Geophysical Research103 (B10), 23925–23936.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. RevilA. and GloverP.W.J.1998. Nature of surface electrical conductivity in natural sands, sandstones, and clays. Geophysical Research Letters25, 691–694.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RevilA., GraulsD. and BrévartO.2002. Mechanical compaction of sand/clay mixtures. Journal of Geophysical Research107 (B11), 2293. doi: DOI: 10.1029/2001JB000318.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. RhoadesJ.D., RaatsP.A.C. and PratherR.J.1976. Effects of liquid‐phase electrical conductivity, water content and surface conductivity on bulk soil electrical conductivity. Soil Science Society America Journal40, 651–655.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. RyjovA.A.1987. The main IP characteristics of rocks. Application of IP Method for Mineral Deposits Research , Pp . 5 – 23 . Moscow ( in Russian ).
     [Google Scholar]
  21. RyjovA.A. and SudoplatovA.D.1990. The calculation of specific electrical conductivity for sandy‐clayed rocks and the usage of functional cross‐plots for the solution of hydro‐geological problems. Scientific and Technical Achievements and Advanced Experience in the Field of Geology and Mineral Deposits Research, pp. 27–41. Moscow (in Russian).
  22. SamstagF.J. and MorganF.D.1991. Induced polarization of shaly sands: Salinity domain modeling by double embedding of the effective medium theory. Geophysics56, 1749–1756.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SenP.N. and GoodeP.A.1988. Shaly sand conductivity at low and high salinities. SPWLA 29th Annual Logging Symposium, Paper F.
  24. SenP.N., ScalaC. and CohenM.N.1981. A self‐similar model for sedimentary rocks with application to the dielectric constant of fused glass beads. Geophysics46, 781–795.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ShevninV., Delgado‐RodríguezO., MousatovA., Nakamura‐LabastidaE. and Mejía‐AguilarA.2003. Oil pollution detection with resistivity sounding. Geofísica Internacional42, 603–622.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. TabbaghA., PanissodC., GuérinR. and CosenzaP.2002. Numerical modeling of the role of water and clay content in soil and rock bulk electrical conductivity. Journal of Geophysical Research107 (B11), 2318.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. TarantolaA.1994. Inverse Problem Theory. A Method for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation . Elsevier. Science Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. TaylorS. and BarkerR.2002. Resistivity of partially saturated Triassic sandstone. Geophysical Prospecting50, 603–613.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. WaxmanM.H. and SmitsL.J.M.1968. Electrical conductivities in oil‐bearing shaly sands. Journal of the Society Petroleum Engineering8, 107–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. WyllieM.R.J. and SouthwickP.F.1954. An experimental investigation of the SP and resistivity phenomena in dirty sands. Journal of Petroleum Technology6, 44–57.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00599.x
Loading
Estimation of clay content in soil based on resistivity modelling and laboratory measurements
Geophysical Prospecting 55, 265 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00599.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00599.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00599.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error