1887
Volume 56, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This paper reports the field setup and preliminary results of experiments utilizing an airgun array in a reservoir in north China for a seismotectonic study. Commonly used in offshore petroleum resource exploration, the airgun source was found to be more useful than a traditional explosive source for large‐scale and long offset land seismic surveys. The airgun array, formed by four 1,500 in3 airguns (a total of 6,000 in3 in volume) was placed at a depth of 6–9 m into the reservoir to generate the pressure impulse. No direct evidence was found that the airgun source adversely affected the fish in the reservoir. The peak ground acceleration recorded on the top of the reservoir dam 100 m away was 17.8 gal in the horizontal direction; this is much less than the designed earthquake‐resistance threshold of 125 gal for this dam. The energy for one shot of this airgun array is about 6.68 MJ, equivalent to firing a 1.7 kg explosive. The seismic waves generated by the airgun source were recorded by receivers of the regional seismic networks and a temporary wide‐angle reflection and refraction profile formed by 100 short‐period seismometers with the maximum source‐receiver offset of 206 km. The seismic wave signature at these long‐offset stations is equivalent to that generated by a traditional blast source in a borehole with a 1,000–2,000 kg explosive. Preliminary results showed clear seismic phases from refractions from the multi‐layer crustal structures in the north China region. Forward modelling using numerical simulation confirms that the seismic arrivals are indeed from lower crustal interfaces. The airgun source is efficient, economical, environmentally friendly and suitable for being used in urbanized areas. It has many advantages over an explosive source for seismotectonic studies such as the high repeatability that is supreme for stacking to improve signal qualities. The disadvantage is that the source is limited to existing lakes or reservoirs, which may restrict experimental geometry.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00679.x
2008-06-28
2020-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BradyR., WernickeB., McNuttM., MutterJ. and CorreaG.2000. Results of the Basin and Range Geoscientific Experiment (BARGE): A marine‐style seismic reflection survey across the eastern boundary of the central Basin and Range Province. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1. doi:DOI: 10.1029/2000GC000078.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BrocherT., ClaytonR., KlitgordK., BohannonR., SliterR., McRaneyJ., GardnerJ. and KeeneJ.1995. Multichannel seismic‐reflection profiling on the R/V Maurice Ewing during the Los Angeles Region Seismic Experiment (LARSE), California. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report , 95–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BrocherT.M., LearyP. and StevensonD.1977. Airgun source crustal refraction study of the Lake Jocasse area, South Carolina. Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union58, 432.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BrocherT.M., ParsonsT., BlakelyR.J., ChristensenN.I., FisherM.A., WellsR.E. and the SHIPS Working Group . 2001. Upper crustal structure in Puget Lowland, Washington: Results from the 1998 Seismic Hazards Investigation in Puget Sound. Journal of Geophysical Research106, 13,541–13,564.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BrocherT.M.2003. Detonation charge size versus coda magnitude relations in California and Nevada. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93, 2089–2105.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BrocherT.M.2005. Empirical relations between elastic wavespeeds and density in the Earth's crust. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95, 2081–2092.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CaldwellJ.2002. Does air‐gun noise harm marine mammals?The Leading Edge21, 75–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CaldwellJ. and DragosetW.2000. A brief overview of seismic air‐gun arrays. The Leading Edge19, 898–902.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ChenY. and ZhuR.2005. The proposed ‘Deep Earth Lightening’ Project. Advances in Earth Science20, 485–489. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ChenY., ZhangW., ChenH., QiC. and ChenQ.2006. Seismic radar. Progress in Geophysics21, 1–5. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CoxE., PearsonA., BlakeJ.R. and OttoS.R.2004. Comparison of methods for modeling the behavior of bubbles produced by marine seismic airguns. Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 451–477.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DragosetW.1984. A comprehensive method for evaluating the design of air guns and air gun arrays. The Leading Edge3, 52–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DragosetW.2000. Introduction to air guns and air‐gun arrays. The Leading Edge19, 892–897.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DeRuiterS.L., TyackP.L., LinY.‐T., NewhallA.E., LynchJ.F. and MillerP.J.2006. Modeling acoustic propagation of airgun array pulses recorded on tagged sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America120, 4100–4114.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. FayR.R.1988. Hearing in Vertebrates: A Psychophysics Databook . Hill‐Fay, Winnetka , IL .
    [Google Scholar]
  16. GeH., LinJ., WangB., SongL., LuoG. and ChenY.2006. A field experiment study of improving the seismic detectiblity with coded source. Chinese Journal of Geophysics49, 864–870. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [Google Scholar]
  17. GauslandI.2000. Impact of seismic surveys on marine life. The Leading Edge19, 903–905.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HolbrookW.S., BrocherT.M., Ten BrinkU.S. and HoleJ.A.1996. Crustal structure of a transform plate boundary: San Francisco Bay and the central California continental margin. Journal of Geophysical Research101, 22,311–22,334.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HoleJ.A., BrocherT.M., KlempererS.L., ParsonsT., BenzH.M. and FurlongK.P.2000. Three‐dimensional seismic velocity structure of the San Francisco Bay area. Journal of Geophysical Research105, 13,859–13,874.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Institute of Geophysics
    Institute of Geophysics . 1990. Atlas of the Historical Earthquakes in China . China Cartographic Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LearyP., MalinP., PhinneyR., BrocherT.M. and Von CollnR.1979. Systematic monitoring of millisecond travel time variations near Palmdale, California. Journal of Geophysical Research84, 659–666.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LiuL. and ArconeS.2005. Propagation of radar pulses from a horizontal dipole in variable dielectric ground: A numerical approach. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications6, 5–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MadsenP., JohnsonT., MillerP., Aguilar SotoN., LynchJ. and TyackP.2006. Quantitative measures of air‐gun pulses recorded on sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) using acoustic tags during controlled exposure experiments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America120, 2366–2379.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. McDonaldM., HildebrandJ., WebbS. and DormanL.1993. Vocalizations of blue and fin whales during a midocean ridge airgun experiment (A). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America94, 1849.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. NieukirkS.L., StaffordK.M., MellingerD.K., DziakR.P. and FoxC.G.2004. Low‐frequency whale and seismic airgun sounds recorded in the mid‐Atlantic Ocean. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America115, 1832–1843.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. OkayaD., SternT., HolbrookS., Van AvendonkH., DaveyF. and HenrysS.2003. Imaging a plate boundary using double‐sided onshore‐offshore seismic profiling. The Leading Edge22, 256–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ParkesG. and HattonL.1986. The Marine Seismic Source . D.Reidel , Dordrecht , the Netherlands .
    [Google Scholar]
  28. QiuX., ChenY., ZhuR., XuH., ShiX., YeC., ZhaoM. and XiaS.2007. The application of large volume airgun sources to the onshore‐offshore seismic surveys: implication of the experimental results in northern South China Sea. Chinese Science Bulletin52, 553–560.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. RichardsonW.J., GreeneJr. C.R., MalmeC.L. and ThomsonD.H.1995. Marine Mammals and Noise . Academic Press, New York .
    [Google Scholar]
  30. RonenS.2002. Psi, pascal, bars, and decibels. The Leading Edge21, 60–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. SchaffD.P. and RichardsP.G.2004. Repeating seismic events in China. Science303, 1176–1178.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. StaplesR.K., HobbsR.W. and WhiteR.S.1999. A comparison between airguns and explosives as wide‐angle seismic sources1. Geophysical Prospecting47, 313–339.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ten BrinkU.S., ZhangJ., BrocherT.M., OkayaD.A., KlitgordK.D. and FuisG.S.2000. Geophysical evidence for the evolution of the California Inner Continental Borderland as a metamorphic core complex. Journal of Geophysical Research105, 5835–5857.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. TréhuA.M., AsudehI., BrocherT.M., LuetgertJ., MooneyW.D., NabelekJ.L. and NakamuraY.1994. Crustal architecture of the Cascadia forearc. Science266, 237–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. WangF., ZhangX., ChenY., LiL., ChenQ., ZhaoJ., ZhangJ. and LiuB.2004. Two‐D P‐wave velocity structure in the mideast segment of Zhangjiakou‐Bohai tectonic zone: Anxin‐Xianghe‐Kuancheng DSS profile. Acta Seismologica Sinica17 (Supplement), 32–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. WesselP. and SmithW.1995. New version of the generic mapping tools released. Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union76, 329.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00679.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00679.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error