1887
Volume 56, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Pore pressure in sediments beneath salt in the Gulf of Mexico varies widely creating a potentially dangerous and difficult drilling challenge. Estimating elastic parameters of sediments beneath salt is key to the prediction of pore pressure and reducing the drilling risk in exiting the base of the salt. In this paper we investigate the ability of 2D waveform inversion to recover the elastic parameters in the sedimentary layer beneath the salt from a walk‐away VSP (vertical seismic profile) carried out with the receivers in the salt, with the objective of estimating pore pressure at the base of the salt (to be estimated using traditional methods). We propose an effective method for performing the inversion and apply this method to a blind test of a large and realistic synthetic dataset. To facilitate the design of a VSP survey suitable to this type of inversion we also present an analysis into the effects of the receiver array receiver spacing. It is shown that the resulting velocity estimates are sufficiently accurate to predict the pore pressure within the limits required for drilling.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00689.x
2008-10-06
2020-04-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BowersG.L.1999. Pore pressure estimation from velocity data: Accounting for overpressure mechanisms besides under‐compaction. In: Pore Pressure and Fracture Gradients, SPE Reprint series No. 49, pp. 78–84. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BowersG.2002. Detecting high overpressure. The Leading Edge21, 174–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BruceB.2002. An introduction to this special section: Pore pressure. The Leading Edge21, 169–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BunksC., SaleckF.M., ZaleskiS. and ChaventG.1995. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics60, 1457–1473.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ChararaM., BarnesC. and TarantolaA.1996. The state of affairs in inversion of seismic data: an OVSP example. 66th SEG meeting, Denver, Colorado, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1999–2002.
  6. CollierJ.S. and SinghS.C.1998. Poisson's ratio structure of young oceanic crust. Journal of Geophysical Research103, 20981–20996.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. EatonB.1975. The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs. SPE Paper 5544.
  8. EbromD., MuellerM., ShahH. and ThomsenL.2002. VSP‐derived Vp/Vs ratios for pressure prediction ahead of the bit. 64th EAGE meeting, Florence , Italy , Expanded Abstracts, F021.
  9. EbromD., HeppardP., MuellerM. and ThomsenL.2003. Pore pressure prediction from S‐wave, C‐wave, and P‐wave velocities. 73rd SEG meeting, Dallas, Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts.
  10. EbromD., HeppardP., ThomsenL., MuellerM., HarroldT., PhillipL. and WatsonP.2004. Effective stress and minimum velocity trends. 74th SEG meeting, Denver, Colorado , USA , Expanded Abstracts.
  11. FreudenreichY.P.2002. P‐ and S‐wave velocity estimation from full wavefield inversion of wide‐aperture seismic data . PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FurreA.2002. The effective stress coefficient for wave velocities in saturated grain packs. 64th EAGE meeting, Florence , Italy , Expanded Abstracts.
  13. GaoF., LevanderA.R., PrattR.G., ZeltC.A. and FradelizioG.L.2006. Wavefield tomography at a groundwater contamination site: VSP‐surface data set. Geophysics71, H1–H11.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GutierrezM., BraunsdorN. and CouzensB.2006. Calibration and ranking of pore‐pressure prediction models. The Leading Edge25, 1516–1523.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HornbyB.1996. An experimental investigation of effective stress principles for sedimentary rocks. 66th SEG meeting, Denver, Colorado , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1707–1710.
  16. HornbyB., YuJ., SharpJ., RayA. and RegoneC.2006. VSP: Beyond time‐to‐depth. The Leading Edge25, 446–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. JapsenP., MukerjiT. and MavkoG.2007. Constraints on velocity‐depth trends from rock physics models. Geophysical Prospecting55, 135–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LaillyP.1983. The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before sack migrations. In: Conference on Inverse Scattering: Theory and Application (eds J.B.Bednar , R.Redner , E.Robinson and A.Weglein ), pp. 206–220. Philadelphia Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  19. LeaneyW.S., HornbyB.E., CampbellA.J., ViceerS., AlbertinM. and MalinvernoA.2004. Sub‐salt velocity prediction with a look‐ahead AVO walkaway. 74th SEG meeting, Denver, Colorado , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 2474–2476.
  20. LevanderA.1988. Fourth‐order finite‐difference P‐SV seismograms. Geophysics53, 1425–1436.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MittetR. and HokstadK.1995. Transforming walk‐away VSP data into reverse VSP data. Geophysics60, 968–977.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. MoraP.1987. Non‐linear two‐dimensional elastic inversion of multi‐offset seismic data. Geophysics52, 1211–1228.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. PengC. and ToksözM.N.1995. An optimal absorbing boundary condition for elastic wave modelling. Geophysics60, 296–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PicaA., DietJ.P. and TarantolaA.1990. Nonlinear inversion of seismic reflection data in a laterally invarient medium. Geophysics55, 284–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. PolakE.1971. Computational Methods in Optimization: A Unified Approach . Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. RaoY., WangY. and MorganJ.V.2006. Crosshole weismic waveform tomography ‐ II. Resolution analysis. Geophysical Journal International166, 1237–1248.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. RobertsM.2007. Full waveform inversion of walk‐away VSP data , PhD thesis, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SheenD.‐H., TuncayK., BaagC.‐E. and OrtolevaP.J.2004. Efficient finite difference calculation of partial derivative seismic wavefield using reciprocity and convolution. 74th SEG meeting, Denver, Colorado , USA , Expanded Abstracts.
  29. ShippR. and SinghS.C.2002. Two‐dimentional full waveform inversion of wide aperture marine seismic streamer data. Geophysical Journal International151, 325–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. TarantolaA.1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics49, 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. TarantolaA.1986. A strategy for non‐linear elastic inversion of seismic reflection data. Geophysics51, 1893–1903.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. TarantolaA.2005. Inverse Problem Theory and Model Parameter Estimation. SIAM.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. TerzaghiK.1936. The shear resistance of saturated soil and the angle between planes of shear. Proceedings of the 1st International Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering Conference , Vol. 1, pp. 54–56. Harvard , MA .
  34. ViceerS., VinsonM.L., HornbyB., EbromD., HeppardP., JayC. and BlangyJ.‐P.2006. Improving drilling efficiency using a look‐ahead VSP to predict pressure, exiting salt: Five Gulf of Mexico examples. 2006 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, 1–4 May 2006, OTC 18262.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00689.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00689.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error