1887
Volume 56, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The ever‐growing size of data sets for active and passive seismic imaging makes the availability of automatic procedures for rapid analysis more and more valuable. Such procedures are especially important for time‐critical applications like emergency decisions or re‐orienting of ongoing seismic surveys. In this paper a new, iterative scheme for 3D traveltime tomography is presented. The technique, based on a tool originally developed for earthquake data, uses cross‐correlation to examine waveform similarity and to adjust arrival times on seismic sections. A preliminary set of reference arrival times is first corrected by the cross‐correlation lag and then used to build an initial 3D tomographic velocity model through a standard inversion code; traveltimes calculated from this model are then taken as new reference arrivals and the process of pick adjustment is repeated. The result is a tomographic image, upgraded and refined at each iteration of the procedure. The test performed on the waveform data set recorded during the 2001 SERAPIS active seismic survey in the gulfs of Naples and Pozzuoli (Southern Italy) shows that the 3D iterative tomography scheme produces a velocity image of the structure of the Campi Flegrei caldera which is consistent with the results from previous studies, employing just a fraction of the time needed by a human analyst to identify first breaks. We believe that this technique can be effectively employed for rapid analysis of large data‐sets within time‐critical or time‐dependent tasks and for automatic 4D tomographic investigations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00700.x
2008-06-28
2020-08-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AllenR.1982. Automatic phase pickers: their present use and future prospects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America72, S225–S242.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BaerM. and KradolferU.1987. An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America77, 1437–1445.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BenzH.M., ChouetB.A., DawsonP.B., LahrJ.C., PageR.A. and HoleJ.A.1996. Three‐dimensional P and S wave velocity structure of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research101, 8111–8128.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BoschettiF., DentithR. and ListM.1996. A fractal‐based algorithm for detecting first arrivals on seismic traces. Geophysics61, 1095–1102.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dello IaconoD., ZolloA., VassalloM., VanorioT. and JudenhercS.2008. Seismic images and rock properties of the very shallow structure of Campi Flegrei caldera (southern Italy). Bulletin of Volcanology (in review).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DodgeD.A., BerozaG.C. and EllsworthW.L.1995. Foreshock sequence of the 1992 Landers, California earthquake and its implications for earthquake nucleation. Journal of Geophysical Research100, 9865–9880.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. FremontM.J. and MaloneS.D.1987. High precision relative locations of earthquakes at Mount St. Helens, Washington. Journal of Geophysical Research92, 10223–10236.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GelchinskyB.1983. Automatic picking of first arrivals and parametrization of traveltime curves. Geophysical Prospecting31, 915–928. doi:DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1983.tb01097.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GotJ.L., FréchetJ. and KleinF.W.1994. Deep fault plane geometry inferred from multiplet relative relocation beneath the south flank of Kilauea. Journal of Geophysical Research99, 15375–15386.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. JudenhercS. and ZolloA.2004. The Bay of Naples (southern Italy): Constraints on the volcanic structures inferred from a dense seismic survey. Bulletin of Volcanology109, B10312.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LayT. and WallaceT.C.1995. Modern Global Seismology . Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MolyneuxJ. and SchmittD.1999. First break timing: Arrival onset times by direct correlation. Geophysics64, 1492–1501. doi:DOI: 10.1190/1.1444653.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MonteillerV., GotJ.‐L., VirieuxJ. and OkuboP.2005. An efficient algorithm for double‐difference tomography and location in heterogeneous media, with an application to Kilauea volcano. Journal of Geophysical Research110, B12306.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MoriyaH., NiitsumaH. and BariaR.2003. Multiplet‐clustering analysis reveals structural details within the seismic cloud at the Soultz geothermal field, France. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93, 1606–1620.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MuratM.E. and RudmanA.J.1992. Automated first arrival picking: a neural network approach. Geophysical Prospecting40, 587–604. doi:DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00543.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. PatanèD., BarberiG., CocinaO., DeGoriP. and ChiarabbaC.2006. Time‐resolved seismic tomography detects magma intrusions at Mount Etna. Science313, 821–823.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. PolakE.1971. Computational Methods in Optimization . Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RoweC.A., AsterR.C., BorchersB. and YoungC.J.2002. An automatic, adaptive algorithm for refining phase picks in large seismic data sets. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92, 1660–1674.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. RoweC.A.H., ThurberC. and WhiteR.A.2004. Dome growth behavior at Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat, revealed by relocation of volcanic event swarms. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research134, 199–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ShearerP.M.1997. Improving local earthquake locations using the L1 norm and waveform cross correlation: application to the Whittier Narrows, California, aftershock sequence. Journal of Geophysical Research102, 8269–8283.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SleemanR. and Van EckT.1999. Robust automatic P‐phase picking: an on‐line implementation of broadband seismogram recordings. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors113, 265–275.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ThurberC.H.1992. Hypocenter‐velocity structure coupling in local earthquake tomography. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors75, 55–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. WaldhauserF. and EllsworthW.L.2000. A double‐difference earthquake location algorithm: method and application to the northern Hayward Fault, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America90, 1353–1368.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. YilmazÖz.2001. Seismic Data Analysis , 2nd edn SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ZhangH., ThurberC. and RoweC.2003. Automatic P‐wave arrival detection and picking with multiscale wavelet analysis for single‐component recordings. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93, 1904–1912.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ZhangH. and ThurberC.H.2003. Double‐difference tomography: The method and its application to the hayward fault, california. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93, 1875–1889.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ZolloA., JudenhercS., AugerE.et al.2003. Evidence for the buried rim of Campi Flegrei caldera from 3‐D active seismic imaging. Geophysical Research Letters30, SDE 10–1.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00700.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00700.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error