The wideband [0.001 Hz–100 kHz] interferometry project in Central Italy

References

1. CarozziT., KarlssonR. and BergmanJ.2000. Parameters characterizing electromagnetic wave polarization. Physics Review E61, 2024–2028.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ChenK.J., ChiuB. and LinC.H.2006. A search for correlation between time change in transfer functions and seismic energy release in northern Taiwan. Earth and Planets Space58, 981–991.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ConstableS.C., ParkerR.L. and ConstableC.G.1987. Occam's inversion; A practical algorithm for the inversion of electromagnetic data. Geophysics52, 289–300.
   [Google Scholar]
4. EgbertG.D. and BookerJ.R.1986. Robust estimation of geomagnetic transfer functions. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society87, 173–194.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fraser‐SmithA.C., BernardiA., McGillP.R., LaddM.E., HelliwellR.A. and VillardO.G.Jr. 1990. Low frequency magnetic field measurements near the epicenter of the Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters17, 1465–1468.
   [Google Scholar]
6. HaradaM., HattoriK. and IsezakiN.2004. Transfer function analysis approach for anomalous ULF geomagnetic field change detection. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth29, 409–417.
   [Google Scholar]
7. HattoriK., TakahashiI., YoshinoC., IsezakiN., IwasakiH., HaradaM. et al . 2004. ULF geomagnetic field measurements in Japan and some recent results associated with Iwateken Nairiku Hokubu Earthquake in 1998. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth29, 481–494.
   [Google Scholar]
8. HayakawaM., HattoriK. and OhtaK.2007. Monitoring of ULF (ultra‐low‐frequency) geomagnetic variations associated with earthquakes. Sensors7, 1108–1122.
   [Google Scholar]
9. HayakawaM., OhtaK. and BabaK.1994. Wave characteristics of tweek atmospherics deduced from the direction finding measurement and theoretical interpretations. Journal of Geophysical Research99, 10733–10743.
   [Google Scholar]
10. IsmaguilovV.S., KopytenkoY., HattoriK. and HayakawaM.2003. Variations of phase velocity and gradient values of ULF geomagnetic disturbances connected with the Izu strong earthquakes. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences3, 211–215.
    [Google Scholar]
11. LanzerottiL.J., MaclennanC.G. and Fraser‐SmithA.C.1990. Background magnetic spectra: ∼10E‐5 to ∼10E+5 Hz. Geophysical Research Letters17, 1593–1596.
    [Google Scholar]
12. MasciF., PalangioP. and MeloniA.2006. The INGV tectonomagnetic network: 2004–2005 preliminary dataset analysis. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences6, 773–777.
    [Google Scholar]
13. MasciF., PalangioP., Di PersioM. and Di LorenzoC.2007. The development of the INGV tectonomagnetic network in the frame of the MEM Project. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences7, 473–478.
    [Google Scholar]
14. NickolaenkoA.P. and HayakawaM.2002. Resonances in the Earth‐Ionosphere Cavity . Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht . ISBN 140200754X.
    [Google Scholar]
15. OhtaK., WatanabeN. and HayakawaM.2005. The observation of ULF emissions at Nakatsugawa in possible association with the 2004 Mid‐Niigata Prefecture earthquake. Earth Planets and Space57, 1003–1008.
    [Google Scholar]
16. PalangioP.1993. Radioricezione ELF‐VLF. Annali di Geopisica36, 99–114.
    [Google Scholar]
17. PalangioP., Di LorenzoC., MasciF. and Di PersioM.2007. The study of the electromagnetic anomalies linked with the Earth's crustal activity in the frequency band [0.001Hz–100kHz]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences7, 507–511.
    [Google Scholar]
18. PalangioP., Di LorenzoC., Di PersioM., MasciF., MihajlovicS., SantarelliL. et al . 2008. Electromagnetic monitoring of the Earth's interior in the frame of MEM project. Annals of Geophysics51 (in press).
    [Google Scholar]
19. SeritaA., HattoriK., YoshinoC., HayakawaM. and IsezakiN.2005. Principal component analysis and singular spectrum analysis of ULF geomagnetic data associated with earthquakes. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences5, 685–689.
    [Google Scholar]
20. TeisseyreR. and ErnstT.2002. Electromagnetic radiation related to dislocation dynamics in a seismic preparation zone. Annals of Geophysics45, 393–399.
    [Google Scholar]