1887
Volume 57, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In common‐reflection‐surface imaging the reflection arrival time field is parameterized by operators that are of higher dimension or order than in conventional methods. Using the common‐reflection‐surface approach locally in the unmigrated prestack data domain opens a potential for trace regularization and interpolation. In most data interpolation methods based on local coherency estimation, a single operator is designed for a target sample and the output amplitude is defined as a weighted average along the operator. This approach may fail in presence of interfering events or strong amplitude and phase variations. In this paper we introduce an alternative scheme in which there is no need for an operator to be defined at the target sample itself. Instead, the amplitude at a target sample is constructed from multiple operators estimated at different positions. In this case one operator may contribute to the construction of several target samples. Vice versa, a target sample might receive contributions from different operators. Operators are determined on a grid which can be sparser than the output grid. This allows to dramatically decrease the computational costs. In addition, the use of multiple operators for a single target sample stabilizes the interpolation results and implicitly allows several contributions in case of interfering events. Due to the considerable computational expense, common‐reflection‐surface interpolation is limited to work in subsets of the prestack data. We present the general workflow of a common‐reflection‐surface‐based regularization/interpolation for 3D data volumes. This workflow has been applied to an OBC common‐receiver volume and binned common‐offset subsets of a 3D marine data set. The impact of a common‐reflection‐surface regularization is demonstrated by means of a subsequent time migration. In comparison to the time migrations of the original and DMO‐interpolated data, the results show particular improvements in view of the continuity of reflections events. This gain is confirmed by an automatic picking of a horizon in the stacked time migrations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00789.x
2009-03-23
2020-03-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DellaMoretta D., KlueverT. and MarchettiP.2006. 3D CRS‐based velocity model building ‐ an accurate and cost‐effective approach. 68th EAGE meeting, Vienna, Austria, Extended Abstracts, P155.
  2. DuveneckE.2004. Velocity model estimation with data‐derived wavefront attributes. Geophysics69, 265–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HoechtG., LandaE. and BainaR.2004. Seimic data interpolation using local wavefield characteristics. 66th EAGE meeting, Paris, France, Extended Abstracts, D031.
  4. HoechtG. and RicarteP.2006a. Analysis of the common‐reflection surface interpolation. 68th EAGE meeting, Vienna, Austria, Extended Abstracts, G029.
  5. HoechtG. and RicarteP.2006b. Parameter‐oriented CRS imaging. 76th SEG meeting, New Orleans, Lousisna, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 2966–2970.
  6. JägerR., MannJ., HöchtG. and HubralP.2001. Common‐reflection‐surface stack: image and attributes. Geophysics66, 97–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KaoC.‐N.1997. A trace interpolation method for spatially aliased and irregularly spaced seismic data. 67th SEG meeting, Dallas, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1108–1110.
  8. HugonnetP. and CanadasG.1997. Regridding of irregular data using 3‐d radon decompositions. 67th SEG meeting, Dallas, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1111–1114.
  9. SacchiM.D. and UlrychT.J.1996. Estimation of the discrete Fourier transform, a linear inversion approach. Geophysics61, 1128–1136.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SpitzS.1991. Seismic trace interpolation in the fx domain. Geophysics56, 785–794.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ThorsonJ.R. and ClaerboutJ.F.1985. Velocity stack and slant stochastic inversion. Geophysics50, 2727–2741.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. TradD.2003. Interpolation and multiple attenuation with migration operators. Geophysics68, 2043–2054.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. XuS., ZhangY., PhamD. and LambaréG.2005. Antileakage fourier transform for seismic data regularization. Geophysics70, V87–V95.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ZhangY., BerglerS. and HubralP.2001. Common‐reflection‐surface (CRS) stack for common‐offset. Geophysical Prospecting49, 709–718.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00789.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00789.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error