Euler homogeneity equation along ridges for a rapid estimation of potential field source properties

References

1. BaliaR., CiminaleM., LoddoM., PecoriniG., RuinaG. and TruduR.1984. Gravity survey and interpretation of Bouguer anomalies in the Campidano geothermal area (Sardinia, Italy). Geothermics133, 333–347.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BaranovW.1975. Potential Fields and Their Transformations in Applied Geophysics . Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin/Stuttgart .
   [Google Scholar]
3. BarbosaV.C.F., SilvaJ.B.C. and MedeirosW.E.1999. Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution. Geophysics64, 48–60.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BlakelyR.J.1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications . Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CarrozzoM.T., LuzioD., MargottaC. and QuartaT.1986. Gravity map of Italy (density 2.4 g /cm3) CNR Progetto finalizzato Geodinamica sottoprogetto Modello strutturale tridimensionale.
6. CooperG.R.J.2002. An improved algorithm for the Euler deconvolution of potential field data. The Leading Edge21, 1197–1198.
   [Google Scholar]
7. FairheadJ.D., BennettK.J., GordonD.R.H. and HuangD.1994. Euler: Beyond the ‘black box’. 64th SEG meeting, Los Angeles , California , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 422–424.
8. FediM.2007. DEXP: a fast method to determine the depth and the structural index of potential fields sources. Geophysics72, I1–I11.
   [Google Scholar]
9. FediM. and FlorioG.2006. Scalefun: 3D analysis of potential field scaling function to determine independently or simultaneously structural index and depth to source. 76th SEG meeting, New Orleans , Louisiana , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 963–966.
10. FediM., PrimiceriR., QuartaT. and VillaniA.V.2004. Joint application of continuous and discrete wavelet transform on gravity data to identify shallow and deep sources. Geophysical Journal International156, 7–21.
    [Google Scholar]
11. FlorioG. and FediM.2006. Euler deconvolution of vertical profiles of potential field data. 76th SEG meeting, New Orleans , Louisiana , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 958–962.
12. HansenR.O. and SuciuL.2002. Multiple‐source Euler deconvolution. Geophysics67, 525–535.
    [Google Scholar]
13. HoodP.1965. Gradient measurements in aeromagnetic surveying. Geophysics30, 891–902.
    [Google Scholar]
14. HornbyP., BoschettiF. and HorovitzF. G.1999. Analysis of potential field data in the wavelet domain. Geophysical Journal International137, 175–196.
    [Google Scholar]
15. MarsonI. and KlingeleE.E.1993. Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3‐D interpretation. Geophysics58, 1588–1595.
    [Google Scholar]
16. MarteletG., SailhacP., MoreauF. and DiamentM.2001. Characterization of geological boundaries using 1‐D wavelet transform on gravity data: Theory and application to the Himalayas. Geophysics66, 1116–1129.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MoreauF., GilbertD., HolschneiderM. and SaraccoG.1997. Wavelet analysis of potential fields. Inverse Problem13, 165–178.
    [Google Scholar]
18. MoreauF., GibertD., HolschneiderM. and SaraccoG.1999. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Basic theory. Journal of Geophysical Research104, 5003–5013.
    [Google Scholar]
19. NaiduP.S. and MathewM.P.1998. Analysis of Geophysical Potential Fields . Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
20. RavatD.1996. Analysis of the Euler method and its applicability in environmental magnetic investigations. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics1, 229–238.
    [Google Scholar]
21. ReidA.B., AllsopJ.M., GranserH., MilletA.J. and SomertonI.1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics55, 80–91.
    [Google Scholar]
22. SailhacP., GaldeanoA., GilbertD., MoreauF. and DelorC.2000. Identification of sources of potential field with the continuous wavelet transform: Complex wavelet and applications to magnetic profiles in French Guiana. Journal of Geophysical Research105, 445–475.
    [Google Scholar]
23. SailhacP. and GilbertD.2003. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Two dimensional wavelets and multipolar approximations. Journal of Geophysical Research108, 2296–2306.
    [Google Scholar]
24. SilvaJ.B.C. and BarbosaV.C.F.2003. 3D Euler deconvolution: Theoretical basis for automatically selecting good solutions. Geophysics68, 1962–1968.
    [Google Scholar]
25. StavrevP.1997. Euler deconvolution using differential similarity transformation of gravity or magnetic anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting45, 207–246.
    [Google Scholar]
26. StavrevP., GerovskaD. and Araúzo‐BravoM.J.2006. Automatic inversion of magnetic anomalies from two height levels using finite‐difference similarity transforms. Geophysics71, L75–L86.
    [Google Scholar]
27. StavrevP. and ReidA.2007. Degreees of homogeneity of potential fields and structural indices of Euler deconvolution. Geophysics72, L1–L12.
    [Google Scholar]
28. ThompsonD.T.1982. EULDPH: A new technique for making computer‐assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics47, 31–37.
    [Google Scholar]
29. ZhangC., MushayandebvuM.F., ReidA.B., FairheadJ.D. and OdegardE.2000. Euler deconvolution of gravity tensor gradient data. Geophysics65, 512–520.
    [Google Scholar]