1887
Volume 58, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Anisotropy in subsurface geological models is primarily caused by two factors: sedimentation in shale/sand layers and fractures. The sedimentation factor is mainly modelled by vertical transverse isotropy (VTI), whereas the fractures are modelled by a horizontal transversely isotropic medium (HTI). In this paper we study hyperbolic and non‐hyperbolic normal reflection moveout for a package of HTI/VTI layers, considering arbitrary azimuthal orientation of the symmetry axis at each HTI layer. We consider a local 1D medium, whose properties change vertically, with flat interfaces between the layers. In this case, the horizontal slowness is preserved; thus, the azimuth of the phase velocity is the same for all layers of the package. In general, however, the azimuth of the ray velocity differs from the azimuth of the phase velocity. The ray azimuth depends on the layer properties and may be different for each layer. In this case, the use of the Dix equation requires projection of the moveout velocity of each layer on the phase plane. We derive an accurate equation for hyperbolic and high‐order terms of the normal moveout, relating the traveltime to the surface offset, or alternatively, to the subsurface reflection angle. We relate the azimuth of the surface offset to its magnitude (or to the reflection angle), considering short and long offsets. We compare the derived approximations with analytical ray tracing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00856.x
2010-01-12
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al‐DajaniA. and TsvankinI.1998. Nonhyperbolic reflection moveout for horizontal transverse isotropy. Geophysics63, 1738–1753.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BakulinA., GrechkaV. and TsvankinI.2000a. Estimation of fracture parameters from reflection seismic data – Part I: HTI model due to a single fracture set. Geophysics65, 1788–1802.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BakulinA., GrechkaV. and TsvankinI.2000b. Estimation of fracture parameters from reflection seismic data – Part II: HTI Fractured models with orthorhombic symmetry. Geophysics65, 1803–1817.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ContrerasP., GrechkaV. and TsvankinI.1999. Moveout inversion of P‐wave data for horizontal transverse isotropy. Geophysics64, 1219–1229.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DixC.H.1955. Seismic velocities from surface measurements. Geophysics20, 68–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. GrechkaV. and TsvankinI.1999. 3‐D moveout velocity analysis and parameter estimation for orthorhombic media. Geophysics64, 820–837.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. TsvankinI.1997a. Reflection moveout and parameter estimation for horizontal transverse isotropy. Geophysics62, 614–629.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. TsvankinI.1997b. Anisotropic parameters and P‐wave velocity for orthorhombic media. Geophysics62, 1292–1309.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. TsvankinI.2001. Seismic Signatures and Analysis of Reflection Data in Anisotropic Media . Elsevier. ISBN 0080446183.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00856.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00856.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anisotropy; Inversion; Modelling; Parameter estimation; Velocity analysis

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error