1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 58, Issue 5
  5. Article
Volume 58, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Microseismic monitoring in petroleum settings provides insights into induced and naturally occurring stress changes. Such data are commonly acquired using an array of sensors in a borehole, providing measures of arrival times and polarizations. Events are located using 1D velocity models, P‐ and S‐wave arrival times and the azimuths of P‐wave particle motions. However in the case of all the sensors being deployed in a vertical or near‐vertical borehole, such analysis leads to an inherent 180° ambiguity in the source location. Here we present a location procedure that removes this ambiguity by using the dip of the particle motion as an information to constrain the initial source location. The new procedure is demonstrated with a dataset acquired during hydraulic fracture stimulation, where we know which side of the monitoring well the events are located. Using a 5‐step location procedure, we then reinvestigate a microseismic data set acquired in April 1997 at the Ekofisk oilfield in the North Sea. Traveltimes for 2683 candidate events are manually picked. A noise‐weighted analytic‐signal polarization analysis is used to estimate the dip and azimuth of P‐wave particle motions. A modified t‐test is used to statistically assess the reliability of event location. As a result, 1462 events are located but 627 are deemed to be statistically reliable. The application of a hierarchal cluster analysis highlights coherent structures that cluster around wells and inferred faults. Most events cluster at a depth of roughly 3km in the Ekofisk chalk formation but very little seismicity is observed from the underlying Tor chalk formation, which is separated from the Ekofisk formation by an impermeable layer. We see no evidence for seismicity in the overburden but such events may be too distant to detect. The resulting picture of microseismicity at Ekofisk is very different from those presented in previous studies.

© 2010 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00873.x
2010-04-06
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00873.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BrewsterJ., Dangerfield, J.A. and FarrelH.1986. The geology and geophysics of the Ekofisk field waterflood. Marine Petroleum Geology3, 139–169.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ClaassenJ.2001. Robust bearing estimation for three‐component stations. Pure and Applied Geophysics158, 349–374.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De MeersmanK., Van Der BaanM. and KendallJ.‐M.2006. Signal extraction and automated polarization analysis of multicomponent array data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96, 2415–2430.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De MeersmanK., KendallJ.‐M. and Van Der BaanM.2009. The 1998 Valhall microseismic data set: An integrated study of relocated sources, seismic multiplets, and S‐wave splitting. Geophysics74, B183–B195.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DuZ., FoulgerG. and MaoW.2000. A note on two problems in connection with graphs. Geophysical Journal International141, 820–828.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. EarleP.S. and ShearerP.M.1994. Characterization of global seismograms using an automated picking algorithm. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America84, 366–376.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. EvansM.D.1966. Man‐made earthquakes in Denver. Geotimes10, 11–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FehlerM., HouseL. and KaiedaH.1987. Determining planes along which earthquakes occur: Method and aplication to earthquakes accompanying hydraulic fracturing. Journal of Geophysical Research92, 9407–9414.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GeigerL.1912. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicentres from arrival times only. Bulletin St. Louis University8, 60–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HealyJ.H., RubeyW.W., GriggsD.T. and RaleighC.B.1968. The Denver Earthquakes. Science161, 1301–1310.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HouseL.1987. Locating microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing in crystalline rock. Geophysical Research Letters14, 919–921.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HouseL.S. and FloresR.2002. Seismological studies of fluid injection in sedimentary rocks, east Texas. Pure and Applied Geophysics159, 371–401.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LeeW.H.K. and StewartS.W.1981. Principles and Applications of Microearthquake Networks . Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MaxwellS.C., BossuR., YoungR.P. and DangerfieldJ.1997. Microseismic logging of Ekofisk borehole C11a during April 1997 . Internal Report Phillips Petroleum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MunnsJ.W.1985. The Valhall Field: a geological overview. Marine and Petroleum Geology60, 23–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nolen‐HoeksemaR.C. and RuffL.J.2001. Moment tensor inversion of microseisms from the B‐sand propped hydrofracture, M‐site, Colorado. Tectonophysics336, 163–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. OyeV. and RothM.2003. Automated seismic event location for hydrocarbon reservoirs. Computers and Geoscience29, 851–863.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. PavlisG.L.1986. Appraising earthquake hypocenter location errors: A complete, practical approach for single‐event locations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America76, 1699–1717.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PhillipsW.S., FairbanksT.D.RutledgeJ.T. and AndersonD.W.1998. Induced microearthquake patterns and oil‐producing fracture systems in Austin chalk. Tectonophysics289, 153–169.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PhillipsW.S., RutledgeJ.T., HouseL.S. and FehlerM.C.2002. Induced microearthquake patterns in hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirs: Six case studies. Pure and Applied Geophysics159, 345–369.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. PressW.H., TeukolskyS.A., VetterlingW.T. and FlanneryB.P.1996. Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77, The Art of Scientific Computing . Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RaleighC.B. and BredehoeftJ.D.1976. An experiment in earthquake control at Rangely, Colorado. Science191, 1230–1237.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. RichterC.F.1958. Elementary Seismology . W.H. Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. RoweC., AsterR., PhillipsW., JonesR., BorchersB. and FehlerM.2002. Using automated, high‐precision repicking to improve delineation of microseismic structures at the Soultz geothermal reservoir. Pure and Applied Geophysics159, 563–596.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. RutledgeJ.T. and PhillipsW.S.2003. Hydraulic stimulation of natural fractures as revealed by induced microearthquakes, Carthage, Cotton Valley gas filed, east Texas. Geophysics68, 441–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. RutledgeJ.T., FairbanksT.D., AlbrightJ.N., BoadeR.R., DangerfieldJ. and LandaG.H.1994. Reservoir microseismicity at the Ekofisk oil field. Eurock '94 Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering.
  27. RutledgeJ.T., PhillipsW.S. and MayerhoferM.J.2004. Faulting induced by forced fluid injection and fluid flow forced by faulting: An interpretation of hydraulic‐fracturing microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley Gas Field, Texas. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94, 1817–1830.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SamsonJ.1983a. Pure states, polarized waves, and principal components in the spectra of multiple, geophysical time‐series. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society34, 403–419.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SamsonJ.1983b. The spectral matrix, eigenvalues, and principal components in the analysis of multichannel geophysical data. Annales Geophysicae1, 115–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. TeufelL.W. and RheuttD.W.1991. Geomechanical evidence of shear failure of chalk during production of the Ekofisk Field. SPE Paper 22755.
  31. VidaleT.1986. Complex polarization analysis of particle motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America76, 1393–1405.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ZobackM.D. and ZinkeJ.C.2002. Production‐induced normal faulting in the Valhall and Ekofisk oil fields. Pure and Applied Geophysics159, 403–420.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00873.x
Loading
Improved microseismic event location by inclusion of a priori dip particle motion: a case study from Ekofisk
Geophysical Prospecting 58, 727 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00873.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00873.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00873.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Ekofisk; Microseismicity; Particle motion; Reservoir monitoring

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error