Refractor velocity analysis: a signal processing procedure

References

1. BerraF., RovelliniM. and JadoulF.1991. Structural framework of the Bergamasc prealps south of the Clusone fault. Atti Ticinensi di Scienze della Terra34, 107–120.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ClaerboutJ.F.1968. Synthesis of layered medium from its acoustic response. Geophysics34, 264–269.
   [Google Scholar]
3. DochertyP.1992. Solving for the thickness and velocity of the weathering layer using 2‐D refraction tomography. Geophysics57, 1307–1318.
   [Google Scholar]
4. DongS., ShengJ. and SchusterJ.T.2006. Theory and practice of refraction Interferometry. 76th SEG meeting, New Orleans , Louisiana , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 3021–3025.
5. ForcellaF. and JadoulF.2000. Carta geologica della Provincia di Bergamo e Note Illustrative . Provincia de Bergamo (in Italian).
   [Google Scholar]
6. de FrancoR. 2005. Multi‐refractor imaging with stacked refraction convolution section. Geophysical Prospecting53, 335–348.
   [Google Scholar]
7. de FrancoR., BerraF., BiellaG., BonioloG., CaielliG., CorsiA. et al . Late Neogene–Quaternary evolution of the intermontane Clusone Basin (Southern Alps, Italy): Integration of seismic and geological data. Journal of Quaternary Science19, 409–421.
   [Google Scholar]
8. HagedoornJ.G.1959. The plus‐minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections. Geophysical Prospecting7, 158–182.
   [Google Scholar]
9. LankstonR.B.1989. The seismic refraction method: A viable tool for mapping shallow targets into the 1990s. Geophysics54, 1535–1542.
   [Google Scholar]
10. LeungT.M.1995. Examination the optimum XY value by ray tracing. Geophysics60, 1151–1156.
    [Google Scholar]
11. D.M.McCann
    LeungT.M.1997. Evaluation of seismic refraction using first arrival raytracing. In: Modern Geophysics in Engineering Geology (eds D.M.McCann , D.M.Eddleston , P.J.Fenning and G.M.Reeves ), pp. 413–416. Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
12. LeungT.M.2003. Controls of traveltime data and problems with the generalized reciprocal method. Geophysics68, 1626–1632.
    [Google Scholar]
13. MatsuokaT., TanerM.T., HayashiT., AshidaY., WatanabeT. and KusumiH.2000. Imaging of refracted waves by convolution. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary , Canada , Expanded Abstracts.
14. MendesM.2009. A hybrid fast algorithm for first arrivals tomography. Geophysical Prospecting57, 803–809.
    [Google Scholar]
15. OsypovK.1999. Refraction tomography without ray tracing. 69th SEG meeting, Houston , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts.
16. PalmerD.1980. The Generalized Reciprocal Method of Seismic Refraction Interpretation . SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
17. PalmerD.1981. An introduction to the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Geophysics46, 1508–1518.
    [Google Scholar]
18. PalmerD.2001a. A new direction for shallow refraction seismology: Integrating amplitude and travel‐times with refraction convolution section. Geophysical Prospecting49, 657–673.
    [Google Scholar]
19. PalmerD.2001b. Imaging refractors with the convolution section. Geophysics66, 1582–1589.
    [Google Scholar]
20. PalmerD.2005. Advancing Shallow Refraction Seismology with the GRM and the RCS – A GRM and RCS Tutorial . EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
21. PalmerD.2006. Refraction traveltime and amplitude corrections for very near‐surface inhomogeneities. Geophysical Prospecting54, 589–604.
    [Google Scholar]
22. PalmerD.2008. Is it time to re‐engineer geotechnical seismic refraction methods?First Break26, 69–77.
    [Google Scholar]
23. PalmerD.2009. Integrating long and short wavelength time and amplitude statics. First Break27, 57–65.
    [Google Scholar]
24. PalmerD.2010. Non‐uniqueness with refraction inversion – A syncline model study. Geophysical Prospecting58, 203–218.
    [Google Scholar]
25. PodvinP. and LecomteI.1991. Finite difference computation of travel times in very contrasted velocity models: Massively parallel approach and its associated tools. Geophysical Journal International105, 271–284.
    [Google Scholar]
26. PullammanappallilS.K. and LouieJ.N.1994. A generalized simulated‐annealing optimization for inversion of first‐arrival times. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America84, 1397–1409.
    [Google Scholar]
27. SchusterG.T. and Quintus‐BoszA.1993. Wavepath eikonal traveltime inversion: Theory. Geophysics58, 1314–1323.
    [Google Scholar]
28. StoffaP.L.1989. Tau‐p: A Plane Wave Approach to the Analysis of Seismic Data . Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
29. StoffaP.L., BuhlP., DieboldJ.B. and WenzelF.1981. Direct Mapping of seismic data to the domain of intercept time and ray parameter – A plane‐wave decomposition. Geophysics46, 255–267.
    [Google Scholar]
30. TelfordW.M., GeldartL.P. and SheriffR.E.1990. Applied Geophysics . Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. TondiR. and de FrancoR.2005. Seismic travel time inversion for 3D structures regularized with Sobolev norms. Inverse Problems21, 525–546. doi:10.1088/0266
    [Google Scholar]
32. WatanabeT., MatsuokaT. and AshidaY.1999. Seismic traveltime tomography using Fresnel volume approach. 69th SEG meeting, Houston , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts.
33. WhiteleyR.J. and EcclestonP.J.2006. Comparison of shallow seismic refraction interpretation methods for regolith mapping. 18th ASEG meeting, Melbourne , Australia , Expanded Abstracts.
34. WrightC.1996. A note on the computation of the offset distance XY in the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting44, 41–53.
    [Google Scholar]
35. ZeltC.A. and SmithR.B.1992. Seismic traveltime inversion for 2‐D crustal velocity structure. Geophysical Journal International108, 16–34.
    [Google Scholar]
36. ZhangJ.2006. Refraction migration: Imaging multiple refractors automatically. 76th SEG meeting, New Orleans , Louisiana , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 2426–2429.
37. ZhangJ., BrinkU.S. and ToksözM.N.1998. Nonlinear refraction and reflection traveltime tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research103, 29743–29757.
    [Google Scholar]