1887
Volume 59, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This study presents the results of experimental compaction while measuring ultrasonic velocities of sands with different grain size, shape, sorting and mineralogy. Uniaxial mechanical compaction tests up to a maximum of 50 MPa effective stress were performed on 29 dry sand aggregates derived from eight different sands to measure the rock properties.

A good agreement was found between the Gassmann saturated bulk moduli of dry and brine saturated tests of selected sands. Sand samples with poor sorting showed low initial porosity while sands with high grain angularity had high initial porosity. The sand compaction tests showed that at a given stress well‐sorted, coarse‐grained sands were more compressible and had higher velocities (p and s) than fine‐grained sands when the mineralogy was similar. This can be attributed to grain crushing, where coarser grains lead to high compressibility and large grain‐to‐grain contact areas result in high velocities. At medium to high stresses the angular coarse to medium grained sands (both sorted sands and un‐sorted whole sands) showed high compaction and velocities (p and s). The small grain‐to‐grain contact areas promote higher deformation at grain contacts, more crushing and increased porosity loss resulting in high velocities. Compaction and velocities (p and s) increased with decreasing sorting in sands. However, at the same porosity, the velocities in whole sands were slightly lower than in the well‐sorted sands indicating the presence of loose smaller grains in‐between the framework grains. Quartz‐poor sands (containing less than 55% quartz) showed higher velocities (p and s) compared to that of quartz‐rich sands. This could be the result of sintering and enlargement of grain contacts of ductile mineral grains in the quartz‐poor sands increasing the effective bulk and shear stiffness. Tests both from wet measurements and Gassmann brine substitution showed a decreasing p/s ratio with increasing effective stress. The quartz‐rich sands separated out towards the higher side of the p/s range.

The Gassmann brine substituted p and s plotted against effective stress provide a measure of the expected velocity range to be found in these and similar sands during mechanical compaction. Deviations of actual well log data from experimental data may indicate uplift, the presence of hydrocarbon, overpressure and/or cementation. Data from this study may help to model velocity‐depth trends and to improve the characterization of reservoir sands from well log data in a low temperature (<80–100o C) zone where compaction of sands is mostly mechanical.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00951.x
2011-04-04
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AvsethP., DvorkinJ., MavkoG. and RykkjeJ.2000. Rock physics diagnostic of North Sea sands: Link between microstructure and seismic properties. Geophysical Research Letters27, 2761–2764.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BachrachR. and AvsethP.2008. Rock physics modeling of unconsolidated sands: Accounting for nonuniform contacts and heterogeneous stress fields in the effective media approximation with applications to hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics73, E197–E209.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BachrachR., DvorkinJ. and NurA.2000. Seismic velocities and Poisson's ratio of shallow unconsolidated sands. Geophysics65, 559–564.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BirchF.1960. The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10‐kilobars: Part 1. Journal of Geophysical Research65, 1083–1102.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BjørkumP.A.1994. How important is pressure in causing dissolution of quartz in sandstones. Journal of Sedimentary Research66, 147–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BjørlykkeK.1998. Clay mineral diagenesis in sedimentary basins – A key to the prediction of rock properties. Examples from the North Sea Basin. Clay Minerals33, 15–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BjørlykkeK.1999. An overview of factors controlling rates of compaction, fluid generation and flow in sedimentary basins. In: Growth, Dissolution, and Pattern Formation in Geosystems (eds B.Jamtveit and P.Meakin ), pp. 381–404. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BjørlykkeK., RammM. and SaigalG.C.1989. Sandstone diagenesis and porosity modification during basin evolution. Geologische Rundschau78, 243–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CastagnaJ.P., BatzleM.L. and EastwoodR.L.1985. Relationships between compressional‐wave and shear‐wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks. Geophysics50, 571–581.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CastagnaJ.P., BatzleM.L. and KanT.K.1993. Rock Physics – The link between rock properties and AVO response. In: Offset‐dependent Reflectivity – Theory and Practice of AVO Analysis (eds J.P.Castagna and M.Backus ), pp. 135–171. SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ChuhanF.A., KjeldstadA., BjorlykkeK. and HoegK.2002. Porosity loss in sand by grain crushing; Experimental evidence and relevance to reservoir quality. Marine and Petroleum Geology19, 39–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ChuhanF.A., KjeldstadA., BjørlykkeK. and HøegK.2003. Experimental compression of loose sands: Relevance to porosity reduction during burial in sedimentary basins. Canadian Geotechnical Journal40, 995–1011.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. CoxM.R. and BudhuM.2008. A practical approach to grain shape quantification. Engineering Geology96, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DanaJ.D., DanaE.S. and GainesR.V.1997. Dana's New Mineralogy: The System of Mineralogy of James Dwight Dana and Edward Salisbury Dana . Wiley. ISBN 0471193100.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DottR.H.1964. Wacke, graywacke and matrix – What approach to immature sandstone classification?Journal of Sedimentary Petrology34, 625–632.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DvorkinJ. and NurA.1996. Elasticity of high‐porosity sandstones: Theory for two North Sea data sets. Geophysics61, 1363–1370.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. FawadM., MondolN.H., JahrenJ. and BjørlykkeK.2010. Seismic velocities from experimental compaction: New porosity and velocity‐depth relations for sands with different textural and mineralogical composition. 80th SEG meeting, Denver, Colorado, USA , Expanded Abstracts.
  18. GassmannF.1951. Über die Elastizität poroser Medien. Vier. der Natur Gesellschaft96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HagertyM.M., HiteD.R., UllrichC.R. and HagertyD.J.1993. One‐dimensional high pressure compression of granular material. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering119, 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HanD.H.1986. Effects of porosity and clay content on acoustic properties of sandstones and unconsolidated sediments . PhD thesis, Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HanD.H. and BatzleM.L.2004. Gassmann's equation and fluid‐saturation effects on seismic velocities. Geophysics69, 398–405.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. JohnsenK.L.1985. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LanderR.H., LareseR.E. and BonnellL.M.2008. Toward more accurate quartz cement models: The importance of euhedral versus noneuhedral growth rates. AAPG Bulletin92, 1537–1563.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LanderR.H. and WalderhaugO.1999. Predicting porosity through simulating sandstone compaction and quartz cementation. AAPG Bulletin83, 433–449.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.2009. The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis in Porous Media. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MindlinR.D.1949. Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the Asme16, 259–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MondolN.H., AvsethP., FawadM. and SmithT.2010. Vs prediction in unconsolidated sands: Physical and geological controls on shear wave velocities. 72nd EAGE meeting, Barcelona , Spain , Expanded Abstracts.
  28. MondolN.H., BjørlykkeK. and JahrenJ.2008. Experimental compaction of clays: Relationship between permeability and petrophysical properties in mudstones. Petroleum Geoscience14, 319–337.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. PageH.G.1955. Phi‐millimeter conversion table. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology25, 285–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. PeltonenC., MarcussenO., BjorlykkeK. and JahrenJ.2008. Mineralogical control on mudstone compaction; A study of Late Cretaceous to early Tertiary mudstones of the Voring and More Basins, Norwegian Sea. Petroleum Geoscience14, 127–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PittmanE.D. and LareseR.E.1991. Compaction of lithic sands: Experimental results and applications. AAPG Bulletin75, 1279–1299.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. PrasadM. and MeissnerR.1992. Attenuation mechanisms in sands: Laboratory versus theoretical (Biot) data. Geophysics57, 710–719.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. RammM.1991. On Quantitative Mineral Analysis of Sandstones using XRD. Internal paper, Department of Geology, University of Oslo.
  34. WaltonK.1987. The effective elastic moduli of a random packing of spheres. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids35, 213–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ZhangJ., WongT.F. and DaviesD.M.1990. Micromechanics of pressure induced grain crushing in porous rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research95, 341–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ZimmerM.A., PrasadM. and MavkoG.2002. Pressure and porosity influences on Vp‐Vs ratio in unconsolidated sands. The Leading Edge21, 178–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. ZimmerM.A., PrasadM., MavkoG. and NurA.2007a. Seismic velocities of unconsolidated sands: Part 1 – Pressure trends from 0.1 to 20 MPa. Geophysics72, E1–E13.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. ZimmerM.A., PrasadM., MavkoG. and NurA.2007b. Seismic velocities of unconsolidated sands: Part 2 – Influence of sorting‐ and compaction‐induced porosity variation. Geophysics72, E15–E25.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00951.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00951.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Porosity; Rock Physics; Ultrasonic velocities

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error