1887
Volume 60 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Dense, wide‐aperture and broad frequency band acquisition improves seismic imaging and potentially allows the use of full waveform inversion for velocity model building. The cost of dense acquisitions however limits its applicability. Blended or simultaneous shooting could lead to a good compromise between cost and dense acquisition, although the cross‐talk between simultaneous sweeps may reduce imaging capabilities. Onshore, a compromise is achieved with distance separated simultaneous sweeping acquisition, because the shots are easily separated when the processing focuses on pre‐critical reflected events. Full waveform inversion for velocity model building however relies on post‐critical reflected, refracted and diving events. These events can interfere in a distance separated simultaneous sweeping acquisition. By using a single vibrator, single receiver data set recorded in Inner Mongolia, China, a distance separated simultaneous sweeping data set is created to study the robustness of full waveform inversion in this acquisition context. This data set is well suited for full waveform inversion since it contains frequencies down to 1.5 Hz and offsets up to 25 km. Full waveform inversion after a crude deblending of the distance separated simultaneous sweeping data set leads to a result very similar to the one obtained from the single vibrator, single receiver data set. The inversion of the blended data set gives a slightly less good result because of the cross‐talk but it is still quite satisfactory.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01036.x
2012-02-03
2020-06-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BagainiC.2010. Acquisition and processing of simultaneous vibroseis data. Geophysical Prospecting58, 81–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BaysalE., KosloffD.D. and SherwoodJ.W.C.1983. Reverse time migration. Geophysics48, 1514–1524.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BeasleyC., ChambersR.E. and JiangZ.1998. A new look at simultaneous sources, in 68th Annual Conference , pp. 133–135, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ben‐Hadj‐AliH., OpertoS. and VirieuxJ.2011. An efficient frequency‐domain full waveform inversion method using simultaneous encoded sources. Geophysics76, R109–R124.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BerkhoutA.J., BlacquiereG. and VerschuurD.J.2009. The concept of double blending: Combining incoherent shooting with incoherent sensing. Geophysics74, A59–A62.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BouskaJ.2009. Distance separated simultaneous sweeping: Efficient 3D vibroseis acquisition in Oman. 79th Annual Conference , pp. 1–5, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BrendersA. and PrattR.G.2007. Full waveform tomography for lithospheric imaging: Results from a blind test in a realistic crustal model. Geophysical Journal International168, 133–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BrossierR., OpertoS. and VirieuxJ.2009. Seismic imaging of complex onshore structures by two‐dimensional elastic frequency‐domain full‐waveform inversion. Geophysics74, WCC63–WCC76.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BunksC., SaleckF.M., ZaleskiS. and ChaventG.1995. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics60, 1457–1473.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. de KokR. and GillespieD.2002. A universal simultaneous shooting technique. 64th Annual Conference , p. A04, EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KrebsJ.R., AndersonJ.E., HinkleyD., NeelamaniR., LeeS., BaumsteinA. and LacasseM.‐D.2009. Fast full‐wavefield seismic inversion using encoded sources. Geophysics76, WCC177–WCC188.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LaillyP.1983. The seismic problem as a sequence of before‐stack migrations. Conference on Inverse Scattering: Theory and Applications , (ed. J.Bednar ), SIAM, Philadelphia .
    [Google Scholar]
  13. NocedalJ. and WrightS. J.2006. Numerical optimization , Springer, N.Y .
    [Google Scholar]
  14. OpertoS., RavautC., ImprotaL., VirieuxJ., HerreroA. and Dell’AversanaP.2004. Quantitative imaging of complex structures from dense wide aperture seismic data by multiscale traveltime and waveform inversion: A case study. Geophysical Prospecting52, 625–651.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. OpertoS., VirieuxJ., DessaJ.X. and PascalG.2006. Crustal‐scale seismic imaging from multifold ocean bottom seismometer data by frequency‐domain full‐waveform tomography: Application to the eastern Nankai trough. Journal of Geophysical Research111, B09306.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. PecholcsP.I., LafonS.K., Al GhamdiT., Al ShammeryH., KelamisP.G., Winteran O., HuoS.X. et al. 2010. Over 40000 vibrator points per day with real‐time quality control: Opportunities and challenges. 80th Annual Conference , pp. 111–115, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. PlessixR.‐É., BaetenG., de MaagJ.W., KlaassenM., RujieZ. and ZhjfeiT.2010. Application of acoustic full waveform inversion to a low‐frequency large‐offset land data set. 80th Annual Conference pp. 930–934, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. PlessixR.‐É. and CaoQ.2011. A parametrization study for surface seismic full waveform inversion in an acoustic vertical transversely isotropic medium. Geophysical Journal International184, 539–556.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PlessixR.‐É. and MulderW.A.2004. Frequency‐domain finite‐difference amplitude preserving migration. Geophysical Journal International157, 975–987.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PlessixR.‐É. and PerkinsC.2010. Full waveform inversion of a deep water ocean bottom dataset. First Break28, 71–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. PrattR.G.1999. Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model. Geophysics64, 888–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. PrattR.G., SongZ.M., WilliamsonP.R. and WarnerM.1996. Two‐dimensional velocity model from wide angle seismic data by wavefield inversion. Geophysical Journal International124, 323–340.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. RomeroL.A., GhigliaD.C., OberC.D. and MortonS.A.2000. Phase encoding of shot records in prestack migration. Geophysics65, 426–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SirgueL., BarkvedO.I., DellingerJ., EtgenJ., AlbertinU. and KommedalJ.H.2010. Full waveform inversion: The next leap forward in imaging at Valhall. First Break28, 65–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. StefaniJ., HampsonG. and HerkenhoffF.2002. Acquisition using simultaneous sources. 69th Annual Conference , p. B006, EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. TarantolaA.1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics49, 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. TarantolaA.2005. Inverse Problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation , SIAM.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. VighD., StarrB., KapoorJ. and LiH.2010. 3D full waveform inversion on a gulf od Mexico data set. 80th Annual Conference , pp. 957–561, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. VirieuxJ. and OpertoS.2009. An overview of full waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics74, WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01036.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01036.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Full waveform inversion and Simultaneous shooting
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error