1887
Volume 61 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Survey sinking migration downward continues the entire surface observed multi‐shot data to the subsurface step by step recursively. Reflected energy from reflectors at current depth appear at zero time and zero offset in the extrapolated wavefield. The data (seismic records) of > 0 at this depth are equivalent to the data acquired by a survey system deployed at this depth. This is the reason to name the process ‘survey sinking’. The records of negative time need not to be further propagated since they carry no information to image structures beneath the new survey system. In this paper, we combine survey sinking with dreamlet migration. The dreamlet migration method decomposes the seismic wavefield and one‐way wave propagator by complete time‐space localized bases. The localization on time gives flexibility on time‐varying operations during depth extrapolation. In dreamlet survey sinking migration, it only keeps the data for imaging the structures beneath the sunk survey system and gets rid of the data already used to image structures above it. The deeper the depth is, the shorter is the valid time records of the remaining data and less computation is needed for one depth step continuation. For data decomposition, in addition to time axis, dreamlet survey sinking also decomposes the data for source and receiver gathers, which is a fully localized decomposition of prestack seismic data. A three‐scatter model is first used to demonstrate the computational feature and principle of this method. Tests on the two‐dimensional SEG/EAGE salt model show that with reduced data sets the proposed method can still obtain good imaging quality on complex geology structures and a strong velocity contrast environment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01048.x
2012-07-02
2020-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AuscherP.1994. Remarks on the local Fourier bases. In: Wavelets, Mathematics, and Applications (eds J.J.Benedetto and M. W.Frazier ). CRC Press, 203–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BiondiB.2003. Equivalence of source‐receiver migration and shot‐profile migration. Geophysics 68, 1340–1347.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BiondiB.2006. 3D Seismic Imaging . SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChenL., WuR.S. and ChenY.2006. Target‐oriented beamlet migration based on Gabor‐Daubechies frame decomposition. Geophysics 71, S37–S52.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ChengJ.B., MaZ.T., GengJ.H. and WangH.Z.2008. Double‐square‐root one‐way wave equation prestack tau migration in heterogeneous media. Geophysical Prospecting 56, 69–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ClaerboutJ.F.1985. Imaging the Earth's Interior . Blackwell Scientific Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ClaerboutJ.F.2009. Imaging in shot‐geophone space. http://www.reproducibility.org.
  8. CoifmanR.R. and MeyerY.1991. Remarques sur l’analyse de Fourier à fenêtre. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, Paris, Serie I 312, 259–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HuaB.L., WilliamsonP., ZhangL.B. and CalandraH.2007. 3‐D prestack depth migration with survey sinking operator in source‐geophone and midpoint‐offset hybrid domain. 77th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2270–2273.
  10. JinS.W., MosherC.C. and WuR.S.2002. Offset‐domain pseudo‐screen prestack depth migration. Geophysics 67, 1985–1902.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MallatS.1999. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing (second edition) . Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MaoJ. and WuR.S.2007. Illumination analysis using local exponential beamlets. 77th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2230–2234.
  13. PopoviciA.M.1996. Prestack migration by split‐step DSR. Geophysics 61(5), 1412–1416.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. WangY.Z. and WuR.S.2000. Seismic data compression by an adaptive local cosine/sine transform and its effects on migration. Geophysical Prospecting 48, 1009–1031.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. WickerhauserM.V.1994. Adapted Wavelet Analysis from Theory to Software . A K Peters.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WuR.S., WangY.Z. and GaoJ. H.2000. Beamlet migration based on local perturbation theory. 70th Annual International Meeting, Society Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, 1008–1011.
  17. WuR.S., WangY. and LuoM.2008. Beamlet migration using local cosine basis. Geophysics 73, 207–217.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. WuB.Y. and WuR.S.2010. Orthogonal dreamlet decomposition and its application to seismic imaging. SEG 80th Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3369–3374.
  19. WuB.Y., WuR.S. and GaoJ.H.2009. Dreamlet prestack depth migration using local cosine basis and local exponential frames. SEG 79th Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2753–2756.
  20. WuR.S., WuB.Y. and GengY.2008. Seismic wave propagation and imaging using time‐space wavelets. 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2983–2987.
  21. WuR.S., WuB.Y. and GengY.2009. Imaging in compressed domain using dreamlets. CPS/SEG Beijing 2009, International Geophysical Conference, Expanded Abstracts, ID:57.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01048.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01048.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Prestack depth migration , Wave equation and Wavelet
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error