1887
Volume 61 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

To provide a guide for future deep (<1.5 km) seismic mineral exploration and to better understand the nature of reflections imaged by surface reflection seismic data in two mining camps and a carbonatite complex of Sweden, more than 50 rock and ore samples were collected and measured for their seismic velocities. The samples are geographically from the northern and central parts of Sweden, ranging from metallic ore deposits, meta‐volcanic and meta‐intrusive rocks to deformed and metamorphosed rocks. First, ultrasonic measurements of P‐ and S‐wave velocities at both atmospheric and elevated pressures, using 0.5 MHz P‐ and S‐wave transducers were conducted. The ultrasonic measurements suggest that most of the measured velocities show positive correlation with the density of the samples with an exception of a massive sulphide ore sample that shows significant low P‐ and S‐wave velocities. The low P‐ and S‐wave velocities are attributed to the mineral texture of the sample and partly lower pyrite content in comparison with a similar type sample obtained from Norway, which shows significantly higher P‐ and S‐wave velocities. Later, an iron ore sample from the central part of Sweden was measured using a low‐frequency (0.1–50 Hz) apparatus to provide comparison with the ultrasonic velocity measurements. The low‐frequency measurements indicate that the iron ore sample has minimal dispersion and attenuation. The iron ore sample shows the highest acoustic impedance among our samples suggesting that these deposits are favourable targets for seismic methods. This is further demonstrated by a real seismic section acquired over an iron ore mine in the central part of Sweden. Finally, a laser‐interferometer device was used to analyse elastic anisotropy of five rock samples taken from a major deformation zone in order to provide insights into the nature of reflections observed from the deformation zone. Up to 10% velocity‐anisotropy is estimated and demonstrated to be present for the samples taken from the deformation zone using the laser‐interferometery measurements. However, the origin of the reflections from the major deformation zone is attributed to a combination of anisotropy and amphibolite lenses within the deformation zone.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01063.x
2012-03-29
2020-04-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BiotM.A.1956a. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid. I Low frequency range. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 28, 168–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BiotM.A.1956b. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid. II Higher frequency range. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 28, 179–191
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BirchF.1961. The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars. Part 2. Journal of Geophysical Research 66, 2199–2224.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BonaA., BucataruI. and SlawinskiM.A.2008. Inversion of ray velocity and polarization for elasticity tensor. Journal of Applied Geophysics 65, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CholachP., MolyneuxJ.B. and SchmittD.R.2005. Flin Flon Belt seismic anisotropy: Elastic symmetry, heterogeneity and shear‐wave splitting. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 42, 533–554.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChristensenN.I.1989. Reflectivity and seismic properties of deep continental crust. Journal of Geophysical Research 94, 17793–17804.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DehghannejadM., JuhlinC., MalehmirA., SkyttäP. and WeihedP.2010. Reflection seismic imaging of the upper crust in the Kristineberg mining area, northern Sweden. Journal of Applied Geophysics 71, 125–136. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.06.002.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. JonesT.D. and NurA.1984. The nature of seismic reflections from deep crustal fault zones. Journal of Geophysical Research 89, 3153–3171.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. JuhlinC., FribergM., EchtlerH., HismatulinT., RybalkaA., GreenA.G. and AnsorgeJ.1998. Crustal structure of the Middle Urals: Results from the ESRU experiments. Tectonics 17, 710–725.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. JuhojunttiN., JuhlinC. and DyreliusD, 2001. Crustal reflectivity underneath the central Scandinavian Caledonides. Tectonophysics 334, 191–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KernH. and WenkH.‐R.1990. Fabric‐related velocity anisotropy and shear wave splitting in rocks from the Santa Rosa mylonite zone, California. Journal of Geophysical Research 95, 11213–11223.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KoistinenT., StephensM.B., BogatchevV., NordgulenØ., WennerströmM. and KorhonenJ.2001. Geological Map of the Fennoscandian Shield, Scale 1:2000000. Geological surveys of Finland, Norway and Sweden and the North‐West Department of Natural Resources of Russia. ISBN: 951‐690‐810‐1.
  13. KrestenP.1980. The Alnö complex: Tectonics of dyke emplacement. Lithos 13, 153–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LebedevM., BonaA., PevznerR. and GurevichB.2011. Elastic anisotropy estimation from laboratory measurements of velocity and polarization of quasi‐P‐waves using laser interferometry. Geophysics 76, WA83–WA89.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LundC.‐E., RobertsR.G., JuhlinC., BödvarsonR. and PalmH.1987. The use of land recorded long‐range marine airgun data in crustal reflection‐refraction investigations. Geophysical Journal Royal Astronomical Society 89, 365–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MalehmirA. and BellefleurG.2009. 3D seismic reflection imaging of VHMS deposits, insights from re‐processing of the Halfmile Lake data, New Brunswick, Canada. Geophysics 74, B209−B219.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MalehmirA., DahlinP., LundbergE., JuhlinC., SjöströmH. and HögdahlK.2011. Reflection seismic investigations in the Dannemora area, central Sweden: Insights into the geometry of poly‐phase deformation zones and magnetite‐skarn deposits. Journal of Geophysical Research 116, B11307, doi:10.1029/2011JB008643
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MalehmirA., ThunehedH. and TryggvasonA.2009. The Paleoproterozoic Kristineberg mining area, northern Sweden: Results from integrated 3D geophysical and geologic modeling, and implications for targeting ore deposits. Geophysics 74, B9–B22.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MalehmirA., TryggvasonA., JuhlinC., Rodriguez−TablanteJ. and WeihedP.2006. Seismic imaging and potential field modeling to delineate structures hosting VHMS deposits in the Skellefte Ore District, northern Sweden. Tectonophyiscs 426, 319–334.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MalehmirA., TryggvasonA., LickorishH. and WeihedP.2007. Regional structural profiles in the western part of the Palaeoproterozoic Skellefte Ore District, northern Sweden. Precambrian Research 159, 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MavkoG., MukerjiT., and DvorkinJ.2009. Rock Physics Handbook . Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 987‐0‐521‐86136‐6.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. McCaffreeC. and ChristensenN.I.1993. Shear wave properties and seismic imaging of mylonite zones. Journal of Geophysical Research 98, 4423–4435.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MikhaltsevitchV., LebedevM. and GurevichB.2011. A Low‐frequency Apparatus for Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of Rocks. 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2011 Vienna , Austria .
  24. NafeJ.E. and DrakeC.L.1963. Physical properties of marine sediments. In The Sea. Interscience. New York , HillM.N. (ed) 3, 794–815.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SalisburyM.H., HarveyC.W. and MatthewsL.2003. The acoustic properties of ores and host rocks in hardrock terranes. In: Hardrock seismic exploration (eds. D.W.Eaton , B.Milkereit and M.H.Salisbury ). SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SalisburyM.H., MilkereitB., AscoughG., AdairR., MatthewsL., SchmittD.R. et al . 2000. Physical properties and seismic imaging of massive sulfides. Geophysics 65, 1882–1889.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SimancasJ.F, CarbonellR., González LodeiroF., Pérez EstaúnA., JuhlinC., AyarzaP. et al . 2003. Crustal structure of the transpressional Variscan orogen of SW Iberia: SW Iberia deep seismic reflection profile (IBERSEIS). Tectonics 22, 1062, doi:10.1029/2002TC001479.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics 51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. WinklerK., NurA. and GladwinM.1979. Friction and seismic attenuation in rocks. Nature 277, 528–531
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01063.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01063.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anisotropy , Deformation and Mining
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error