1887
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Repurposing depleted oil and gas reservoirs for secondary storage may play an important role in the transition to low-carbon energy. The integrity of the cap rocks overlying the reservoirs is an important factor for gas storage and needs to be understood prior to repurposing. In some cases, old cap-rock cores collected during exploration and development of oil and gas fields may be available for characterization using modern techniques but after being stored for decades these cores are likely to have experienced many changes in moisture, which can lead to physical changes. A comparative study of samples taken from old, unpreserved mudstone core and samples from a recently acquired and preserved core taken from the same formation shows that the mineralogy, porosity and permeability results are relatively similar between the two cores. The differences in the porosity measurements between the old and new core samples are primarily due to natural variations in grain size, rather than the preservation status of the cores. Geomechanical data, however, show significant and non-systematic differences between the old samples and the new samples, suggesting that old core samples are not suitable for geomechanical characterization. In the absence of new, well-preserved core, old core samples may provide suitable porosity, permeability and mineralogical data, whereas the old, unpreserved core is unlikely to provide reliable geomechanical data.

Individual BIB-SEM porosity measurements for each sample are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6725765

This article is part of the Fault and top seals 2022 collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/fault-and-top-seals-2022

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2023-013
2023-08-08
2025-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amann, F., Kaiser, P. and Button, E.A.2012. Experimental study of brittle behavior of clay shale in rapid triaxial compression. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 45, 21–33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0195-9
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett, E.P., Joyner, L.G. and Halenda, P.P.1951. The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. computations from nitrogen isotherms. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 73, 373–380, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01145a126
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Basu, S., Jones, A. and Mahzari, P.2020. Best practices for shale core handling: transportation, sampling and storage for conduction of analyses. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8, 136, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8020136
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bensing, J.P., Misch, D., Skerbisch, L. and Sachsenhofer, R.F.2022. Hydrogen-induced calcite dissolution in Amaltheenton Formation claystones: implications for underground hydrogen storage caprock integrity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47, 30 621–30 626, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.023
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chenevert, M.E. and Amanullah, M.2001. Shale preservation and testing techniques for borehole-stability studies. SPE Drilling & Completion, 16, 146–149, https://doi.org/10.2118/73191-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Erguler, Z.A. and Ulusay, R.2009. Water-induced variations in mechanical properties of clay-bearing rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 46, 355–370, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.07.002
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ewy, R.T.2015. Shale/claystone response to air and liquid exposure, and implications for handling, sampling and testing. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 80, 388–401, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.10.009
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Feng, X. and Jimenez, R.2014. Bayesian prediction of elastic modulus of intact rocks using their uniaxial compressive strength. Engineering Geology, 173, 32–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.02.005
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Flesch, S., Pudlo, D., Albrecht, D., Jacob, A. and Enzmann, F.2018. Hydrogen underground storage – petrographic and petrophysical variations in reservoir sandstones from laboratory experiments under simulated reservoir conditions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43, 20822–20835, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.112
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Foh, S., Novil, M., Rockar, E. and Randolph, P.1979. Underground Hydrogen Storage. Final Report. [Salt Caverns, Excavated Caverns, Aquifers and Depleted Fields]. Technical Report BNL-51275. Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY, https://doi.org/10.2172/6536941
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hettema, M.H.H., Hanssen, T.H. and Jones, B.L.2002. Minimizing coring-induced damage in consolidated rock. Paper SPE-78156-MS presented at theSPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference, 20–23 October 2002, Irving, Texas, USA, https://doi.org/10.2118/78156-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Horsrud, P., SØnstebØ, E.F. and BØe, R.1998. Mechanical and petrophysical properties of North Sea shales. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 35, 1009–1020, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(98)00162-4
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ibanez, W.D. and Kronenberg, A.K.1993. Experimental deformation of shale: mechanical properties and microstructural indicators of mechanisms. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 30, 723–734, https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)90014-5
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Iglauer, S.2022. Optimum geological storage depths for structural H2 geo-storage. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 212, 109498, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109498
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ISO2010. ISO 9277:2010: Determination of the Specific Surface Area of Solids by Gas Adsorption — BET Method. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Klaver, J., Desbois, G., Urai, J.L. and Littke, R.2012. BIB-SEM study of the pore space morphology in early mature Posidonia Shale from the Hils area, Germany. International Journal of Coal Geology, 103, 12–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2012.06.012
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kovari, K., Tisa, A., Einstein, H.H. and Franklin, J.A.1983. Suggested methods for determining the strength of rock materials in triaxial compression: revised version. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 20, 283–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Labus, K. and Tarkowski, R.2022. Modeling hydrogen–rock–brine interactions for the Jurassic reservoir and cap rocks from Polish Lowlands. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47, 10 947–10 962, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.134
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, H., Lai, B. and Lin, S.2016. Shale mechanical properties influence factors overview and experimental investigation on water content effects. Journal of Sustainable Energy Engineering, 3, 275–298, https://doi.org/10.7569/JSEE.2016.629501
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Z., Liu, S., Ren, W., Fang, J., Zhu, Q. and Dun, Z.2020. Multiscale laboratory study and numerical analysis of water-weakening effect on shale. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, e5263431, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5263431
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin, S. and Lai, B.2013. Experimental investigation of water saturation effects on Barnett Shale's geomechanical behaviors. Paper SPE-166234-MS presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 September–2 October 2013, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, https://doi.org/10.2118/166234-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, C.-D., Cheng, Y., Jiao, Y.-Y., Zhang, G.-H., Zhang, W.-S., Ou, G.-Z. and Tan, F.2021. Experimental study on the effect of water on mechanical properties of swelling mudstone. Engineering Geology, 295, 106448, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106448
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lord, A.S., Kobos, P.H. and Borns, D.J.2014. Geologic storage of hydrogen: scaling up to meet city transportation demands. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 15 570–15 582, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.121
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lysyy, M., Fernø, M. and Ersland, G.2021. Seasonal hydrogen storage in a depleted oil and gas field. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46, 25 160–25 174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.030
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McCusker, L.B., Liebau, F. and Engelhardt, G.2001. Nomenclature of structural and compositional characteristics of ordered microporous and mesoporous materials with inorganic hosts (IUPAC Recommendations 2001). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 73, 381–394, https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200173020381
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Meier, L. and Kahr, G.1999. Determination of the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of clay minerals using the complexes of copper(II) Ion with triethylenetetramine and tetraethylenepentamine. Clays and Clay Minerals, 47, 386–388, https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1999.0470315
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Minardi, A., Giger, S.B. et al.2021. Benchmark study of undrained triaxial testing of Opalinus Clay shale: results and implications for robust testing. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 25, 100210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2020.100210
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Misch, D., Siedl, W., Drews, M., Liu, B., Klaver, J., Pupp, M. and Sachsenhofer, R.F.2021. Mineralogical, BIB-SEM and petrophysical data in seal rock analysis: a case study from the Vienna Basin, Austria. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 44, 25–46, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12777
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Moore, D.M. and Reynolds, R.C.1997. X-Ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mouli-Castillo, J., Heinemann, N. and Edlmann, K.2021. Mapping geological hydrogen storage capacity and regional heating demands: an applied UK case study. Applied Energy, 283, 116348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116348
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Murrell, S.A.F.1965. The effect of triaxial stress systems on the strength of rocks at atmospheric temperatures. Geophysical Journal International, 10, 231–281, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1965.tb03155.x
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pham, Q.T., Vales, F., Malinsky, L., Nguyen Minh, D. and Gharbi, H.2005. Effect of desaturation–resaturation on mechanical behaviour of shale. Paper ARMA-05-793 presented atAlaska Rocks 2005, the 40th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), 25–29 June 2005, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Richard, T.G. and Advani, S.H.1982. An experimental investigation of the combined effects of strain rate and moisture content on shale.Paper ARMA-82-315 presented at the23rd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), 25–27 August 1982, Berkeley, California, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rybacki, E., Reinicke, A., Meier, T., Makasi, M. and Dresen, G.2015. What controls the mechanical properties of shale rocks? – Part I: Strength and Young's modulus. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 135, 702–722, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.10.028
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sabatakakis, N., Koukis, G., Tsiambaos, G. and Papanakli, S.2008. Index properties and strength variation controlled by microstructure for sedimentary rocks. Engineering Geology, 97, 80–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.12.004
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sambo, C., Dudun, A., Samuel, S.A., Esenenjor, P., Muhammed, N.S. and Haq, B.2022. A review on worldwide underground hydrogen storage operating and potential fields. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47, 22 840–22 880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.126
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schultz, G.1964. Quantitative Interpretation of Mineralogical Composition from X-Ray and Chemical Data for the Pierre Shale. United States Geological Survey Professional Papers, 391-C.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sing, K.2001. The use of nitrogen adsorption for the characterisation of porous materials. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 187–188, 3–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(01)00612-4
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sonmez, H., Tuncay, E. and Gokceoglu, C.2004. Models to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity for Ankara Agglomerate. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 41, 717–729, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.01.011
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Tang, C.-S., Shi, B., Liu, C., Suo, W.-B. and Gao, L.2011. Experimental characterization of shrinkage and desiccation cracking in thin clay layer. Applied Clay Science, 52, 69–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2011.01.032
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tarkowski, R.2019. Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, 86–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tarkowski, R. and Uliasz-Misiak, B.2022. Towards underground hydrogen storage: A review of barriers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 162, 112451, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112451
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Thomeer, J. and Murphy, D. 2000. Capillarity in Rocks. Shell/OGCI PetroSkills.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Valès, F., Nguyen Minh, D., Gharbi, H. and Rejeb, A.2004. Experimental study of the influence of the degree of saturation on physical and mechanical properties in Tournemire shale (France). Applied Clay Science, 26, 197–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2003.12.032
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Van Eeckhout, E.M.1976. The mechanisms of strength reduction due to moisture in coal mine shales. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 13, 61–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(76)90705-1
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Eeckhout, E.M. and Peng, S.S.1975. The effect of humidity on the compliances of coal mine shales. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 12, 335–340, https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(75)90166-7
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wallace, R.L., Cai, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, K. and Guo, C.2021. Utility-scale subsurface hydrogen storage: UK perspectives and technology. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46, 25 137–25 159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.034
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wan, M., Delage, P., Tang, A.M. and Talandier, J.2013. Water retention properties of the Callovo-Oxfordian claystone. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 64, 96–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.08.020
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, Y. and Aladejare, A.E.2016. Bayesian characterization of correlation between uniaxial compressive strength and Young's modulus of rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 85, 10–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.02.010
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Washburn, E.W.1921. The dynamics of capillary flow. Physical Review, 17, 273–283, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.17.273
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wild, K.M., Wymann, L.P., Zimmer, S., Thoeny, R. and Amann, F.2015. Water retention characteristics and state-dependent mechanical and petro-physical properties of a clay shale. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 48, 427–439, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0565-1
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang, F., Xie, S.Y., Hu, D.W., Shao, J.F. and Gatmiri, B.2012. Effect of water content and structural anisotropy on mechanical property of claystone. Applied Clay Science, 69, 79–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.09.024
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zivar, D., Kumar, S. and Foroozesh, J.2021. Underground hydrogen storage: a comprehensive review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46, 23 436–23 462, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.138
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2023-013
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2023-013
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error