1887
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN:
PDF

Abstract

Hydrogen is an energy carrier that can balance the divergent variations in seasonal energy demand and energy supply from renewables. Underground hydrogen storage in porous formations, such as depleted gas sandstone reservoirs or saline aquifers, provides the capacities needed for large-scale, long-duration energy balancing. This paper reports on the fundamental behaviour of hydrogen in a model reservoir setup, involving a two-phase (H, water) system and a two well (injector, producer) setup placed at different depths in the reservoir. We specifically focus on the impact of natural heterogeneities, and associated permeability contrasts, on flow and efficacy of hydrogen injection and production. We found that positioning the wells, both injector and producer, at the top of the reservoir facilitates the highest hydrogen production. We also found that permeability contrasts of three to four orders of magnitude significantly affect hydrogen flow; however, factors affecting the pressure gradient also need to be considered. These factors include compartmentalization, the behaviour of co-existing fluids and the localized pressure gradient created by the hydrogen plume. Our research underlines the need to understand the architecture of the whole reservoir, from seismic to sub-seismic scales, not just the zones surrounding the wells and pathways in-between, as this controls capacity, pressure fluctuations and informs operational management decisions.

This article is part of the Hydrogen as a future energy source collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/hydrogen

[open-access]

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2023-039
2024-05-02
2024-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/geoenergy/2/1/geoenergy2023-039.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2023-039&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aftab, A., Hassanpouryouzband, A., Xie, Q., Machuca, L.L. and Sarmadivaleh, M.2022. Toward a fundamental understanding of geological hydrogen storage. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 61, 3233–3253, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04380
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Amirthan, T. and Perera, M.S.A.2022. The role of storage systems in hydrogen economy: a review. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 108, 104843, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104843
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arekhov, V., Clemens, T., Wegner, J., Abdelmoula, M. and Manai, T.2023. The role of diffusion on reservoir performance in underground hydrogen storage. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 26, 1566–1582, https://doi.org/10.2118/214435-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  4. AusGov2019. Australia's National Hydrogen Strategy, https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/australias-national-hydrogen-strategy.pdf [last accessed 21 October 2022].
  5. Bo, Z., Boon, M., Hajibeygi, H. and Hurter, S.2023. Impact of experimentally measured relative permeability hysteresis on reservoir-scale performance of underground hydrogen storage (UHS). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48, 13527–13542, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.270
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boon, M. and Hajibeygi, H.2022. Experimental characterization of H2/water multiphase flow in heterogeneous sandstone rock at the core scale relevant for underground hydrogen storage (UHS). Scientifc Reports, 12, 14604, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18759-8
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cedigaz2020. Underground gas storage in the world – 2020 status, https://www.cedigaz.org/underground-gas-storage-in-the-world-2020-status/ [last accessed 23 December 2021].
  8. Chai, M., Chen, Z., Nourozieh, H. and Yang, M.2023. Numerical simulation of large-scale seasonal hydrogen storage in an anticline aquifer: a case study capturing hydrogen interactions and cushion gas injection. Applied Energy, 334, 120655, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120655
    [Google Scholar]
  9. de Coninck, H., Revi, A., Babiker, M., Bertoldi, P., Buckeridge, M., Cartwright, A., Dong, W., Ford, J., Fuss, S., Hourcade, J.C., Ley, D., Mechler, R., Newman, P., Revokatova, A., Schultz, S., Steg, L. and Sugiyama, T.2018. Strengthening and implementing the global response. In:Global Warming of 1.5°C: Summary for Policy Makers. IPCC - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 313–443.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Feldmann, F., Hagemann, B., Ganzer, L. and Panfilov, M.2016. Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic and gas mixing processes in underground hydrogen storages. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 1165, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5948-z
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fu, P., Settgast, R.R., Hao, T., Morris, J.P. and Ryerson, F.J.2017. The influence of hydraulic fracturing on carbon storage performance. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122, 9931–9949, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014942
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gasanzade, F., Tilmann Pfeiffer, W., Witte, F., Tuschy, I. and Bauer, S.2021. Subsurface renewable energy storage capacity for hydrogen, methane and compressed air – a performance assessment study from the North German Basin. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 149, 111422, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111422
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Griffiths, J., Faulkner, D.R., Edwards, A.P. and Worden, R.H.2016. Deformation band development as a function of intrinsic host-rock properties in Triassic Sherwood Sandstone. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 435, 161–176, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP435.11
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hashemi, L., Blunt, M. and Hajibeygi, H.2021. Pore-scale modelling and sensitivity analyses of hydrogen-brine multiphase flow in geological porous media. Scientific Reports, 11, 8348, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87490-7
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heinemann, N., Alcalde, J. et al.2021. Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media – the scientific challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 14, 853, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee03536j
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hydrogen TCP-Task 422023. Underground Hydrogen Storage: Technology Monitor Report, https://www.ieahydrogen.org/task/task-42-underground-hydrogen-storage/ [last accessed 31 July 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
  17. IEA2021. Hydrogen: Tracking Report – November 2021, https://www.iea.org/reports/hydrogen [last accessed 7 December 2021].
    [Google Scholar]
  18. IEA2023a. Global Hydrogen Review, https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2023 [last accessed 14 December 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
  19. IEA2023.bNet Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5°C Goal in Reach, https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-roadmap-a-global-pathway-to-keep-the-15-0c-goal-in-reach [last accessed 14 December 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jangda, Z., Menke, H., Busch, A., Geiger, S., Bultreys, T. and Singh, K.2023. Subsurface hydrogen storage controlled by small-scale rock heterogeneities, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.05302 [last accessed 10 October 2023].
  21. Jenkins, C., Chadwick, A. and Hovorka, S.D.2015. The state of the art in monitoring and verification – ten years on. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, 312–349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.009 [last accessed 20 August 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kampman, N., Bickle, M.J. et al.2014. Drilling and sampling a natural CO2 reservoir: implications for fluid flow and CO2-fluid–rock reactions during CO2 migration through the overburden. Chemical Geology, 369, 51–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.11.015
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kanaani, M., Sedaee, B. and Asadian-Pakfar, M.2022. Role of cushion gas on underground hydrogen storage in depleted oil reservoirs. Journal of Energy Storage, 45, 103783, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103783
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Krystinik, L.F.1990. Development geology in eolian reservoirs. In:Fryberger, S.G., Krystinik, L.F. and Schenk, C.J. (eds) Modern and Ancient Aeolian Deposits: Petroleum Exploration and Production. SEPM, Denver, 13-1–13-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lawrence, A., Stuart, M., Cheney, C., Jones, N. and Moss, R.2006. Investigating the scale of structural controls on chlorinated hydrocarbon distributions in the fractured-porous unsaturated zone of a sandstone aquifer in the UK. Hydrogeology Journal, 14, 1470–1482, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-006-0068-6
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Leveille, G.P., Knipe, R. et al.1997. Compartmentalization of Rotliegendes gas reservoirs by sealing faults, Jupiter Fields Area, Southern North Sea. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 123, 87–104, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1997.123.01.06
    [Google Scholar]
  27. LKAB2022. HYBRIT: Milestone reached – pilot facility for hydrogen storage up and running, https://lkab.com/en/press/hybrit-milestone-reached-pilot-facility-for-hydrogen-storage-up-and-running/#:∼:text=In%20May%202021%2C%20construction%20began,operation%20in%20late%20summer%202022 [last accessed 31 July 2023].
  28. Lubon, K. and Tarkowski, R.2020. Numerical simulation of hydrogen injection and withdrawal to and from a deep aquifer in NW Poland. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45, 2068–2083, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.055
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lysyy, M., Fernø, M. and Ersland, G.2021. Seasonal hydrogen storage in a depleted oil and gas field. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46, 25160–25174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.030
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lysyy, M., Fernø, M.A. and Ersland, G.2023. Effect of relative permeability hysteresis on reservoir simulation of underground hydrogen storage in an offshore aquifer. Journal of Energy Storage, 64, 107229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.107229
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mahdi, D.S., Al-Khdheeawi, E.A., Yujie Yuan, Y., Zhang, Y. and Iglauer, S.2021. Hydrogen underground storage efficiency in a heterogeneous sandstone reservoir. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 5, 437–443, https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2021.04.08
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Medici, G., Jared West, L., Mountney, N.P. and Welch, M.2019. Permeability of rock discontinuities and faults in the Triassic Sherwood Sandstone Group (UK): insights for management of fluvio-aeolian aquifers worldwide. Hydrogeology Journal, 27, 2835–2855, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-02035-7
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Miocic, J.M., Heinemann, N., Edlmann, K., Scafidi, J., Molaei, F. and Alcalde, J.2023. Underground hydrogen storage: a review. In:Miocic, J.M., Heinemann, N., Edlmann, K., Alcalde, J. and Schultz, R.A. (eds) Enabling Secure Subsurface Storage in Future Energy Systems.Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 528, 73–86, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP528-2022-88
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mohamed, E.A. and Worden, R.H.2006. Groundwater compartmentalisation: a water table height and geochemical analysis of the structural controls on the subdivision of a major aquifer, the Sherwood Sandstone, Merseyside, UK. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10, 49–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-49-2006
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mouli-Castillo, J., Heinemann, N. and Edlmann, K.2021. Mapping geological hydrogen storage capacity and regional heating demands: an applied UK case study. Applied Energy, 283, 116348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116348
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mountney, N.P.2011. A stratigraphic model to account for complexity in aeolian dune and interdune successions. Sedimentology, 59, 964–989, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2011.01287.x
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Muhammed, N.S., Haq, B., Al Shehri, D., Al-Ahmed, A., Rahman, M.M. and Zaman, E.2022. A review on underground hydrogen storage: insight into geological sites, influencing factors and future outlook. Energy Reports, 8, 461–499, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.002
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pan, B., Yin, X., Ju, Y. and Iglauer, S.2021. Underground hydrogen storage: influencing parameters and future outlook. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 294, 102473, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102473
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pan, B., Liu, K. et al.2023. Impacts of relative permeability hysteresis, wettability, and injection/withdrawal schemes on underground hydrogen storage in saline aquifers. Fuel, 333, 126516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126516
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pei, M., Petäjäniemi, M., Regnell, A. and Wijk, O.2020. Toward a fossil free future with HYBRIT: development of iron and steelmaking technology in Sweden and Finland. Metals, 10, 972, https://doi.org/10.3390/met10070972
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pfeiffer, W.T., al Hagrey, S.A., Köhn, D., Rabbel, W. and Bauer, S.2016. Porous media hydrogen storage at a synthetic, heterogeneous field site: numerical simulation of storage operation and geophysical monitoring. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5958-x
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pfeiffer, W.T., Beyer, C. and Bauer, S.2017. Hydrogen storage in a heterogeneous sandstone formation: dimensioning and induced hydraulic effects. Petroleum Geoscience, 23, 315–326, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2016-050
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pourmalek, A., Newell, A.J., Shariatipour, S.M., Butcher, A.S., Milodowski, A.E., Bagheri, M. and Wood, A.M.2021. Deformation bands in high-porosity sandstones: do they help or hinder CO2 migration and storage in geological formations?International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 107, 103292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103292
    [Google Scholar]
  44. RAG2023. Underground Sun Storage 2030, https://www.uss-2030.at/en/ [last accessed 14 December 2023].
  45. Ringrose, P. and Bentley, M.2021. Reservoir Model Design: A Practitioner's Guide. 2nd edn. Springer Nature, Switzerland, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70163-5
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ringrose, P.S., Mathieson, A.S. et al.2013. The In Salah CO2 storage project: lessons learned and knowledge transfer. Energy Procedia, 37, 6226–6236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.551
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Robinson, D.B. and Peng, D.Y.1978. The Characterization of the Heptanes and Heavier Fractions for the GPA Peng–Robinson Programs. Gas Processors Association, Research report RR-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Scafidi, J., Wilkinson, M., Gilfillan, S.M.V., Heinemann, N. and Haszeldine, R.S.2021. Quantitative assessment of the hydrogen storage capacity of the UK continental shelf. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46, 8629–8639, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.106
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tarkowski, R.2019. Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, 86–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051
    [Google Scholar]
  50. UKGov2020. The Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-ten-point-plan-for-a-green-industrial-revolution [last accessed 19 November 2021].
  51. UKGov2021. UK Hydrogen Strategy, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-hydrogen-strategy [last accessed 19 November 2021].
  52. USGov2021. The Long-Term Strategy of the United States: Pathways to Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/US-Long-Term-Strategy.pdf [last accessed 7 December 2021].
  53. Wakefield, O.J.W., Hough, E., Hennissen, J.A.I., Thompson, J., Cripps, C. and Parkes, D.2022. Lithofacies control on the formation of deformation bands: an example from the Sherwood Sandstone Group (Induan–Anisian, Lower Triassic) in Western England. AAPG Bulletin, 106, 1301–1324, https://doi.org/10.1306/02032218027
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, G., Pickup, G., Sorbie, K. and Mackay, E.2022. Scaling analysis of hydrogen flow with carbon dioxide cushion gas in subsurface heterogeneous porous media. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47, 1752–1764, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.224
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Zamehrian, M. and Sedaee, B.2022. Underground hydrogen storage in a partially depleted gas condensate reservoir: influence of cushion gas. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 212, 110304, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110304
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Al Kobaisi, M., Iglauer, S. and Arif, M.2023. Effect of cyclic hysteretic multiphase flow on underground hydrogen storage: a numerical investigation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 49, Part D, 336–350https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.169
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhou, J., Deng, G., Tian, S., Xian, X., Yang, K., Zhang, C. and Dong, Z.2023. Experimental study on the permeability variation of sandstone at cyclic stress: Implication for underground gas storage. Journal of Energy Storage, 60, 106677, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.106677
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2023-039
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2023-039
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error