1887
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN:
PDF

Abstract

This paper facilitates heating-decarbonization policy implementation with regards to district-scale ground source heat pumps (GSHPs), demonstrating how favourability tools and geospatial visualization can inform communities’ and policy-makers’ net-zero decision-making. A map-based decision tool visualizes the geospatial relationships between heat resource, heat demand and socio-demographic consideration factors. A framework of six core geological and heat demand considerations is presented with additional socio-demographic data integration by the end user encouraged. An underpinning algorithm combines data, creating a resource favourability index, weighting of which is user defined. Capacity to dynamically integrate, visualize and manipulate intrinsic and external data enables informed policy decisions and system design. End users may direct specific geospatial queries combining all data types, allowing a non-geological expert, policy-maker or community organization to form a holistic understanding of the limitations and benefits to GSHP deployment. Initial findings in Scotland indicate that superficial deposit distribution primarily drives the geothermal resource extent; however, the heat demand distribution is a major spatial limitation to utilization. A key policy implication is the nature of the localized resource, which requires local knowledge and planning to utilize. Responsibility for realizing national carbon targets through such energy planning measures increasingly lies with local governments, to which this tool contributes a method of geoscience-to-policy communication.

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London for GSL and EAGE

[open-access]

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2024-034
2025-06-20
2026-02-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2024-034
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/geoenergy/3/1/geoenergy2024-034.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2024-034&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abesser, C., Lewis, M.A., Marchant, A.P. and Hulbert, A.G.2014. Mapping suitability for open-loop ground source heat pump systems: a screening tool for England and Wales, UK. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 47, 373–380, doi: 10.1144/qjegh2014-05010.1144/qjegh2014‑050
     https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2014-050 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acheilas, I., Hooimeijer, F. and Ersoy, A.2020. A decision support tool for implementing district heatting in existing cities, focusing on using a geothermal source. Energies, 13, 2750, doi: 10.3390/en1311275010.3390/en13112750
     https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112750 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmad, S.2023. Motivations and Barriers Associated with Adopting Domestic Heat Pumps in the UK. UK Collaborative Centre for Housing Evidence, Glasgow, UK, https://housingevidence.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Heat-pumps-report-final.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen, A. and Milenic, D.2003. Low-enthalpy geothermal energy resources from groundwater in fluvioglacial gravels of buried valleys. Applied Energy, 74, 9–19, doi: 10.1016/S0306-2619(02)00126-510.1016/S0306‑2619(02)00126‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(02)00126-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen, A., Milenic, D. and Sikora, P.2003. Shallow gravel aquifers and the urban ‘heat island’ effect: a source of low enthalpy geothermal energy. Geothermics, 32, 569–578, doi: 10.1016/S0375-6505(03)00063-410.1016/S0375‑6505(03)00063‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6505(03)00063-4 [Google Scholar]
  6. Arola, T., Eskola, L., Hellen, J. and Korkka-Niemi, K.2014. Mapping the low enthalpy geothermal potential of shallow Quaernary aquifers in Finland. Geothermal Energy, 2, 1–20, doi: 10.1186/s40517-014-0009-x10.1186/s40517‑014‑0009‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-014-0009-x [Google Scholar]
  7. Arola, T., Korhonen, K., Martinkauppi, A., Leppäharju, N., Hakala, P., Ahonen, L. and Pashkovskii, M.2019. Creating shallow geothermal potential maps for Finland. In: European Geothermal Congress 2019. European Geothermal Energy Council (EGEC), Brussels, 11–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Banks, D.2009a. An introduction to ‘thermogeology’ and the exploitation of ground source heat. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 42, 283–293, doi: 10.1144/1470-9236/08-07710.1144/1470‑9236/08‑077
     https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/08-077 [Google Scholar]
  9. Banks, D.2009b. Thermogeological assessment of open-loop well-doublet schemes: a review and synthesis of analytical approaches. Hydrogeology Journal, 17, 1149, doi: 10.1007/s10040-008-0427-610.1007/s10040‑008‑0427‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0427-6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Banks, G., Olsen, S. and Gusak, A.2020. A method to evaluate REE-HFSE mineralised provinces by value creation potential, and an example of application: Gardar REE-HFSE province, Greenland. Geoscience Frontiers, 11, 2141–2156, doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.01910.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.019
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.019 [Google Scholar]
  11. Batchelor, T., Curtis, R. and Busby, J.2021. Geothermal energy use, country update for the United Kingdom. Paper presented at theWorld Geothermal Congress 2020 + 1, April 26–May 2, 2020, Reykjavik, Iceland.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bezelgues, S., Martin, J.C., Schomburgk, S., Monnot, P., Nguyen, D., Le Brun, M. and Desplan, A.2010. Geothermal potential of shallow aquifers: decision-aid tool for heat-pump installation. Paper presented at theWorld Geothermal Congress 2010, April 25–30, 2020, Bali, Indonesia.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. BGS2023a. Susceptibility to Groundwater Flooding. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK, https://www2.bgs.ac.uk/groundwater/datainfo/GFSD.html [last accessed 13 March 2023].
  14. BGS2023b. BGS Geology 625K. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK, https://www.bgs.ac.uk/datasets/bgs-geology-625k/ [last accessed 8 March 2023].
  15. Brown, C.S., Cassidy, N.J., Egan, S.S. and Griffiths, D.2022. Thermal and economic analysis of heat exchnagers as a part of a geothermal district heating scheme in the Cheshire Basin, UK. Energies, 15, 1983, doi: 10.3390/en1506198310.3390/en15061983
     https://doi.org/10.3390/en15061983 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brownsort, P. and Johnson, G.2017. Geothermal Energy in Scotland: A Sythesis Report Covering Four Feasibility Studies. Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage (SCCS), https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/57573367/Geothermal_synthesis_report.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Buffa, S., Cozzini, M., D'antoni, M., Baratieri, M. and Fedrizzi, R.2019. 5th generation district heating and cooling systems: a review of existing cases in Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 504–522, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.05910.1016/j.rser.2018.12.059
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.059 [Google Scholar]
  18. Busby, J.2010. Geothermal prospects in the United Kingdom. Paper presented at theWorld Geothermal Congress 2010, 25–29 April 2010, Bali, Indonesia.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Busby, J., Lewis, M., Reeves, H. and Lawley, R.2009. Initial geological considerations before installing ground source heat pump systems. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 42, 295–306, doi: 10.1144/1470-9236/08-09210.1144/1470‑9236/08‑092
     https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/08-092 [Google Scholar]
  20. Busby, J., Kingdon, A. and Williams, J.2011. The measured shallow temperature field in Britain. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 44, 373–387, doi: 10.1144/1470-9236/10-04910.1144/1470‑9236/10‑049
     https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/10-049 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bush, R.E. and Bale, C.2014. Realising the social benefits of district heating through strategic planning. Paper presented at the14th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling, 8–9 September 2014, Stockholm, Sweden.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Casasso, A. and Sethi, R.2016. G.POT: a quantitative method for the assesment and mapping of the shallow geothermal potential. Energy, 106, 765–773, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.09110.1016/j.energy.2016.03.091
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.091 [Google Scholar]
  23. Corbett, M., Rhodes, E., Pardy, A. and Long, Z.2023. Pumping up adoption: The role of policy awareness in explaining willingess to adopt heat pumps in Canada. Energy Research & Social Science, 96, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.10292610.1016/j.erss.2022.102926
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102926 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dalla Santa, G., Galgaro, A. et al.2020. An updated ground thermal properties database for GSHP applications. Geothermics, 85, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.10175810.1016/j.geothermics.2019.101758
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.101758 [Google Scholar]
  25. Entwisle, D., Lawley, R., Tye, A. and Turner, P.2015. User Guide for DigMapPlus Engineering Properties: Sulfate and Sulfide Potential. BGS Open Report OR/15/054. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Flower, J., Hawker, G. and Bell, K.2020. Hetrogeneity of UK residential heat demand and its impact on the value case for heat pumps. Energy Policy, 144, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.11159310.1016/j.enpol.2020.111593
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111593 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gaur, A.S., Fitiwi, D.Z. and Curtis, J.2021. Heat pumps and our low-carbon future: A comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.10176410.1016/j.erss.2020.101764
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101764 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hollis, D., McCarthy, M., Kendon, M., Legg, T. and Simpson, I.2019. HadUK-Grid – a new UK dataset of gridded climate observations. Geoscience Data Journal, 6, 151–159, doi: 10.1002/gdj3.7810.1002/gdj3.78
     https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.78 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jones, C.R. and Singleton, A.J.2000. Public water supplies from alluvial and glacial deposits in northern Scotland. Geological Society of London, Special Publications, 182, 133–139, doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.182.01.1310.1144/GSL.SP.2000.182.01.13
     https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.182.01.13 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kallis, G., Stephanides, P., Bailey, E., Devine-Wright, P., Chalvatzis, K. and Bailey, I.2021. The challenges of engaging island communities: lessons on renewable energy from a review of 17 case studies. Energy Research & Social Science, 81, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.10225710.1016/j.erss.2021.102257
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102257 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kearsey, T.I., Lee, J.R. and Gow, H.2017. User Guide for the British Geological Survey Buried Valleys (Onshore) Version 1. BGS Open Report OR/19/024. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kearsey, T.I., Lee, J.R., Finlayson, A., Garcia-Bajo, M. and Irving, A.A.2019a. Examining the geometry, age and genesis of buried Quaternary valley systems in the Midland Valley of Scotland, UK. Boreas, 48, 658–677, doi: 10.1111/bor.1236410.1111/bor.12364
     https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.12364 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kearsey, T., Lee, J.R. and Gow, H.2019b. Buried Valleys (onshore) Version 1. Scientific Report and Methodology. BGS Open Report OR/19/003. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kokoni, S. and Leach, M.2021. Policy mechanisms to supposrt heat pump deployment: a UK case study based on techno-economic modelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.rset.2021.10000910.1016/j.rset.2021.100009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2021.100009 [Google Scholar]
  35. Krcmar, D., Marschalko, M. et al.2020. Mapping the low-enthalpy geothermal potential of Quaternary alluvial aquifers in Slovakia. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 79, 1225–1238, doi: 10.1007/s10064-019-01650-810.1007/s10064‑019‑01650‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01650-8 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lawley, R.2016. User Guide for the British Geological Survey Superficial Deposit Thickness (1 km Hex-Grid) Dataset. BGS Open Report OR/16/057. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lawley, R. and Garcia-Bajo, M.2009. The National Superficial Deposit Thickness Model (version 5). BGS Internal Report OR/09/049. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lennon, B., Dunphy, N.P. and Sanvicente, E.2019. Community acceptability and the energy transition: a citizens’ perspective. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9, 1–18, doi: 10.1186/s13705-019-0218-z10.1186/s13705‑019‑0218‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0218-z [Google Scholar]
  39. Lin, D., Crabtree, J. et al.2020. The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7, 1–5, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0340-y10.1038/s41597‑019‑0340‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0340-y [Google Scholar]
  40. Marker, B.R.2016. Urban planning: the geoscience input. Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 27, 35–43, doi: 10.1144/EGSP27.310.1144/EGSP27.3
     https://doi.org/10.1144/EGSP27.3 [Google Scholar]
  41. McCay, A. and Younger, P.2017. Ranking the geothermal potential of radiothermal granites in Scotland: are any others as hot as the Cairngorms?Scottish Journal of Geology, 53, 1–11, doi: 10.1144/sjg2016-00810.1144/sjg2016‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg2016-008 [Google Scholar]
  42. Meibodi, S.S. and Loveridge, F.2022. The future role of energy geostructures in fifth generation district heating and cooling networks. Energy, 240, 122481, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.12248110.1016/j.energy.2021.122481
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122481 [Google Scholar]
  43. Met Office, Hollis, D., McCarthy, M., Kendon, M. and Legg, T.2022. HadUK-Grid Climate Observations by UK Countries, v1.1.0.0 (1836–2021). NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, doi: 10.5285/59a7cd0dcd474f5f906ead4073a9be8b10.5285/59a7cd0dcd474f5f906ead4073a9be8b [last accessed 15 August 2022].
     https://doi.org/10.5285/59a7cd0dcd474f5f906ead4073a9be8b
  44. Millar, M., Burnside, N. and Yu, Z.2019. District heating challenges for the UK. Energies, 12, 310, doi: 10.3390/en1202031010.3390/en12020310
     https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020310 [Google Scholar]
  45. O Dochartaigh, B.E., Doce, D.D., Rutter, H.K. and MacDonald, A.M.2015a. User Guide: Aquifer Productivity (Scotland) GIS Datasets, Version 2. Revised Report. BGS Open Report OR/15/003. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. O Dochartaigh, B.E., MacDonald, A.M., Fitzsimons, V. and Ward, R.2015b. Scotland's Aquifers and Groundwater Bodies. BGS Open Report OR/15/028. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ostergaard, D.S. and Svendsen, S.2016a. Replacing critical radiators to increase the potential to use low-temperature district heating – a case study of 4 Danish single-family houses from the 1930s. Energy, 110, 75–84, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.14010.1016/j.energy.2016.03.140
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.140 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ostergaard, D.S. and Svendsen, S.2016b. Theoretical overview of heating power and necessary heating supply temperatures in typical Danish single-family houses from the 1900s. Energy and Buildings, 126, 375–383, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.03410.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.034
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.034 [Google Scholar]
  49. Ostergaard, D. and Svend, S.2017. Space heating with ultra-low-temperature district heating – a case study of four single-family houses from the 1980s. Energy Procedia, 116, 226–235, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.07010.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.070
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.070 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ouzzane, M., Eslami-Nejad, P., Badache, M. and Aidoun, Z.2015. New correlations for the prediction of the undisturbed ground temperature. Geothermics, 53, 379–384, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.08.00110.1016/j.geothermics.2014.08.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rees, S.J.2016. An introduction to ground-source heat pump technology. In: Rees, S.J. (ed.) Advances in Gound-Source Heat Pump Systems. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 1–25, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100311-4.00001-710.1016/B978‑0‑08‑100311‑4.00001‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100311-4.00001-7 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rybach, L. and Sanner, B.2000. Ground-source heat pump systems; the European experience. Geo-Heat Center Bulletin, 21, 16–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Sani, A.K., Singh, R.M., Amis, T. and Cavarretta, I.2019. A review on the performance of geothermal energy pile foundation, its design process and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 106, 54–79, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.00810.1016/j.rser.2019.02.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  54. Scottish Government2019. Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Act, 2019. Scottish Government, Edinburgh, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2019/15/contents/enacted [last accessed 17 January 2023].
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Scottish Government2020. Update to the Climate Change Plan 2018–2032 Securing a Green Recovery on a Path to Net Zero. Scottish Government, Edinburgh, https://www.gov.scot/publications/securing-green-recovery-path-net-zero-update-climate-change-plan-20182032/documents/ [last accessed 17 January 2023].
  56. Scottish Government2021. Heat in Buildings Strategy – Achieving Net Zero emissions in Scotland's Buildings. Scottish Government, Edinburgh, https://www.gov.scot/publications/heat-buildings-strategy-achieving-net-zero-emissions-scotlands-buildings/documents/ [last accessed 18 January 2023].
  57. Scottish Government2022a. Energy and Climate Change Directorate, Scotland Heat Map. Scottish Government, Edinburgh, https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotland-heat-map-documents/ [last accessed 1 March 2023].
  58. Scottish Government2022b. Heat Networks Delivery Plan. Scottish Government, Edinburgh, https://www.gov.scot/publications/heat-networks-delivery-plan/documents/ [last accessed 14 September 2023].
  59. Singh, H., Muetze, A. and Eames, P.C.2010. Factors influencing the uptake of heat pump technology by the UK domestic sector. Renewable Energy, 35, 873–878, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.10.00110.1016/j.renene.2009.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  60. Snijders, A.L. and Drijver, B.C.2016. Open-loop heat pump and thermal energy storage systems. In: Rees, S.J. (ed.) Advances in Ground-Source Heat Pump Systems. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 247–268, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100311-4.00009-110.1016/B978‑0‑08‑100311‑4.00009‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100311-4.00009-1 [Google Scholar]
  61. Supapo, K., Lozano, L., Tabanag, I. and Querikiol, E.2021. A geospatial approach to energy planning in aid of just energy transition in small Island communities in the Philippines. Applied Sciences, 11, 11955, doi: 10.3390/app11241195510.3390/app112411955
     https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411955 [Google Scholar]
  62. Townsend, D.H., Naismith, J.D., Townsend, P.J., Milner, M.G. and Fraser, U.T.2021. On the rocks – exploring business models for geothermal heat in the land of Scotch. Paper presented at theWorld Geothermal Congress 2020 + 1, April 26–May 2, 2020, Reykjavik, Iceland.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Tye, A.M. and Entwisle, D.E.2011. User Guide for the British Geological Survey Corrosivity (Ferrous) Dataset. BGS Open Report OR/11/023. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Wade, F., Webb, J. and Creamer, E.2022. Local government capacities to support net zero: developing comprehensive heat and energy efficiency strategies in Scotland. Energy Research & Social Science, 89, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.10254410.1016/j.erss.2022.102544
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102544 [Google Scholar]
  65. Walker, G.2009. Beyond distribution and proximity: exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. Antipode, 41, 614–636, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00691.x10.1111/j.1467‑8330.2009.00691.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00691.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang, X. and Lo, K.2021. Just transition: a conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 82, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.10229110.1016/j.erss.2021.102291
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102291 [Google Scholar]
  67. Watson, S., Westaway, R. and Falcone, G.2019. A review of deep geothermal energy and future oppertunities in the UK. In: European Geothermal Congress 2019. European Geothermal Energy Council (EGEC), Brussels, 11–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M. et al.2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 1–9, doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.1810.1038/sdata.2016.18
     https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18 [Google Scholar]
  69. Williams, A. and Thomson, M.2023. Significance of insulation and heat pumps in decarbonising the UK. Journal of Energy and Power Technology, 5, 1–12, doi: 10.21926/jept.230100310.21926/jept.2301003
     https://doi.org/10.21926/jept.2301003 [Google Scholar]
  70. Wu, R.2009. Energy efficiency technologies – air source heat pump vs. ground source heat pump. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2, 14–23, doi: 10.5539/jsd.v2n2p1410.5539/jsd.v2n2p14
     https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v2n2p14 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2024-034
Loading
Favourability index: an early-stage geospatial screening tool for low-enthalpy geothermal assessment mapping in superficial aquifers
Geoenergy 3, geoenergy2024-034 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1144/geoenergy2024-034
/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2024-034
/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2024-034
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error