1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

High-resolution crosshole seismic surveying is a powerful technique for monitoring potential CO leakage in the shallow subsurface and tracking the injection process. A set-up employing a high-frequency seismic source in one well and a fibre-optic receiver array in another enables rapid and efficient seismic data acquisition, with repeat surveys allowing for time-lapse analysis. Such data were collected during the controlled shallow CO release experiment at the CO2CRC's Otway International Test Centre in April 2024. Straight-ray tomography images from the initial surveys revealed a velocity anomaly near the injection interval, which migrated upward following the end of injection. To further investigate the CO plume evolution, three additional surveys were conducted 10, 12 and 14 months after injection ceased. In this study, all crosshole datasets were analysed to provide a comprehensive overview of both short-term and long-term monitoring results. A new data processing workflow was developed, incorporating advanced tomography that accounts for seismic wave refraction caused by velocity variations in the medium. The updated results are consistent with previous findings but exhibit reduced uncertainty. The recent monitoring data indicate that the velocity anomaly near the injection zone persists but has decreased in size, while its further evolution continues at a slower rate compared with the initial post-injection period.

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London for GSL and EAGE. All rights, including for text and data mining (TDM), artificial intelligence (AI) training, and similar technologies, are reserved. For permissions: https://www.lyellcollection.org/publishing-hub/permissions-policy. Publishing disclaimer: https://www.lyellcollection.org/publishing-hub/publishing-ethics

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2025-047
2026-02-27
2026-03-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2025-047
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ajayi, T., Gomes, J.S. and Bera, A.2019. A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. Petroleum Science, 16, 1028–1063, doi: 10.1007/s12182-019-0340-810.1007/s12182‑019‑0340‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-0340-8 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beloborodov, N., Tertyshnikov, K. et al.2025. Monitoring injected CO2 migration using time-lapse crosshole seismic testing with downhole DAS receivers and an electric sparker source. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 147, 104495, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.10449510.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104495
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104495 [Google Scholar]
  3. Daley, T.M., Myer, L.R., Peterson, J.E., Majer, E.L. and Hoversten, G.M.2008. Time-lapse crosswell seismic and VSP monitoring of injected CO2 in a brine aquifer. Environmental Geology, 54, 1657–1665, doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-0943-z10.1007/s00254‑007‑0943‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0943-z [Google Scholar]
  4. Feitz, A., Radke, B. et al.2022. The CO2CRC Otway shallow CO2 controlled release experiment: fault characterization and geophysical monitoring design. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 118, 103667, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.10366710.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103667
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103667 [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris, J.M., Nolen-Hoeksema, R.C., Langan, R.T., Van Schaack, M., Lazaratos, S.K. and Rector, J.W.1995. High-resolution crosswell imaging of a west Texas carbonate reservoir: part 1 – project summary and interpretation. Geophysics, 60, 667–681, doi: 10.1190/1.144380610.1190/1.1443806
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443806 [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnston, D.H.2013. Practical Applications of Time-Lapse Seismic Data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H., Loos, M. and Meyer, L.2005. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Rücker, C., Günther, T. and Wagner, F.M.2017. pyGIMLi: an open-source library for modelling and inversion in geophysics. Computers & Geosciences, 109, 106–123, doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.07.01110.1016/j.cageo.2017.07.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.07.011 [Google Scholar]
  9. Saito, H., Nobuoka, D., Azuma, H., Xue, Z. and Tanase, D.2006. Time-lapse crosswell seismic tomography for monitoring injected CO2 in an onshore aquifer, Nagaoka, Japan. Exploration Geophysics, 37, 30–36, doi: 10.1071/EG0603010.1071/EG06030
     https://doi.org/10.1071/EG06030 [Google Scholar]
  10. Tertyshnikov, K., Beloborodov, N. et al.2025. Geophysical monitoring of shallow CO2 controlled release experiment: Otway Project Field Case Study. In:86th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition (Workshop Programme), Toulouse, France, 2025, 1–5, doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.202510151410.3997/2214‑4609.2025101514
     https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101514 [Google Scholar]
  11. Williams, S.N.1995. Dead trees tell tales. Nature, 376, 644–644, doi: 10.1038/376644a010.1038/376644a0
     https://doi.org/10.1038/376644a0 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2025-047
Loading
Crosshole seismic monitoring of CO2 plume evolution with an electric sparker source and distributed acoustic sensors
Geoenergy 4, geoenergy2025-047 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1144/geoenergy2025-047
/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2025-047
/content/journals/10.1144/geoenergy2025-047
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error