Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:


The transmissibility expression generally used for connections across faults in industrial flow-simulation models built using corner-point geometry is inaccurate, because of cell misalignments across the faults. A comprehensive suite of high-resolution flow-simulation models has been designed to assess the magnitude of the error, which is greatest for connections with smaller juxtaposition areas; between cells with higher : ratios; between cells with greater length: height aspect ratios; in more heterogeneous sequences; for connections containing more permissive fault rocks; and for connections between cells with lower angular misalignments. Transmissibility can be underestimated by a factor of 10 or more in the absence of fault rock; however, the inclusion of realistic fault transmissibility multipliers virtually eliminates the error. The expression for transmissibility for corner-point geometry models contained in commercial simulators is therefore within acceptable limits for most realistic faulted full-field models.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aavatsmark, I.
    2002. An introduction to multipoint flux approximations for quadrilateral grids. Computational Geosciences, 6, 405–432.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aavatsmark, I., Reiso, E. & Teigland, R.
    2001. Control-volume discretization method for quadrilateral grids with faults and local refinements. Computational Geosciences, 5, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cordazzo, J., Maliska, C.R. & de Silva, A.F.C.
    2002. Interblock transmissibility calculation analysis for petroleum reservoir simulation. In: Proceedings from the 2nd Meeting on Reservoir Simulation.5–6 November 2002, Universidad Argentina de la Empresa, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ding, Y. & Lemonnier, P.
    1995. Use of corner point geometry in reservoir simulation. In:International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, 14–17 November, Beijing, China. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX, USA, Paper SPE 29933.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Eigestad, G.T., Aavatsmark, I., Reiso, E. & Reme, H.
    2002. MPFA for faults with crossing grid lines and zig-zag patterns. In: ECMOR VIII – 8th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, 3–6 September 2002, Freiberg, Germany, EAGE, Houten, The Netherlands, 1–10. doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.201405933
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Freeman, S.R., Harris, S.D. & Knipe, R.J.
    2010. Cross-fault sealing, baffling and fluid flow in 3D geological models: tools for analysis, visualization and interpretation. In: Jolley, S.J., Fisher, Q.J., Ainsworth, R.B., Vrolijk, P.J. & Delisle, S.J. (eds) Reservoir Compartmentalization. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 347, 257–282, http://doi.org/10.1144/SP347.15
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jolley, S.J., Dijk, H., Lamens, J.H., Fisher, Q.J., Manzocchi, T., Eikmans, H. & Huang, Y.
    2007. Faulting and fault sealing in production simulation models: Brent Province, northern North Sea. Petroleum Geoscience, 13, 321–340, http://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079306-733
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim, Y-S. & Sanderson, D.J.
    2005. The relationship between displacement and length of faults: a review. Earth-Science Reviews, 68, 317–334.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Manzocchi, T., Walsh, J.J., Nell, P. & Yielding, G.
    1999. Fault transmissibility multipliers for flow simulation models. Petroleum Geoscience, 5, 53–63, http://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.5.1.53
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Manzocchi, T., Matthews, J.D. et al.
    2008. A study of the structural controls on oil recovery for shallow-marine reservoirs. Petroleum Geoscience, 14, 55–70, http://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079307-786
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mattax, C.C. & Dalton, R.L.
    1990. Reservoir Simulation. SPE Monograph Series, 13. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Myers, R.D., Allgood, A., Hjellbakk, A., Vrolijk, P. & Briedis, N.
    2007. Testing fault transmissibility prediction in a structurally dominated reservoir: Ringhorne field, Norway. In: Jolley, S.J., Barr, D., Walsh, J.J. & Knipe, R.J. (eds) Structurally Complex Reservoirs. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 292, 271–294, http://doi.org/10.1144/SP292.16
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ponting, D.K.
    1989. Corner point geometry in reservoir simulation. In: Proceedings of the Joint IMA/SPE European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, 14–16 July 1989, Cambridge, UK. EAGE, Houten, The Netherlands, 45–65. doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.201411305
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Samier, P. & Masson, R.
    2015. Implementation of a vertex centered method inside an industrial reservoir simulator – Practical issues and comprehensive comparison with CPG and PEBI grid models on a field case. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 23–25 February 2015, Houston, Texas, USA, SPE Paper 173309, http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/173309-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Schlumberger
    . 2014a. Eclipse Technical Description, Version 2014.2. Schlumberger, Houston, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. . 2014b. FrontSim User Guide, Version 2014.2. Schlumberger, Houston, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Walsh, J.J., Watterson, J., Heath, A.E. & Childs, C.
    1998. Representation and scaling of faults in fluid flow models. Petroleum Geoscience, 4, 241–251, http://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.4.3.241
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error