Volume 25, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:


At the 2015 United Nations International Climate Change Conference in Paris (COP21), 197 national parties committed to limit global warming to well below 2°C. But current plans and pace of progress are still far from sufficient to achieve this objective. Here we review the role that geoscience and the subsurface could play in decarbonizing electricity production, industry, transport and heating to meet UK and international climate change targets, based on contributions to the 2019 Bryan Lovell meeting held at the Geological Society of London. Technologies discussed at the meeting involved decarbonization of electricity production via renewable sources of power generation, substitution of domestic heating using geothermal energy, use of carbon capture and storage (CCS), and more ambitious technologies such as bioenergy and carbon capture and storage (BECCS) that target negative emissions. It was noted also that growth in renewable energy supply will lead to increased demand for geological materials to sustain the electrification of the vehicle fleet and other low-carbon technologies. The overall conclusion reached at the 2019 Bryan Lovell meeting was that geoscience is critical to decarbonization, but that the geoscience community must influence decision-makers so that the value of the subsurface to decarbonization is understood.



Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Committee on Climate Change
    . 2019. Net Zero: The UK's Contribution to Stopping Global Warming.May 2019. Committee on Climate Change, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Energy Transitions Commission
    . 2017. Better Energy, Greater Prosperity Achievable Pathways to Low-carbon Energy Systems. April 2017. Energy Transitions Commission, http://www.energy-transitions.org/better-energy-greater-prosperity
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gibbins, J. & Chalmers, H.
    2008. Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy, 36, 4317–4322, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.058
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldthau, A., Westphal, K., Bazilian, M. & Bradshaw, M.
    2019. Model and manage the changing geopolitics of energy. Nature, 569, 29–31, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01312-5
    [Google Scholar]
  5. IEA
    . 2018. World Energy Outlook 2018. International Energy Agency, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. IPCC
    . 2018. Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P. et al. (eds) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C Above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. IRENA
    . 2019. Global Energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050. 2019 edn. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pacala, S. & Socolow, R.
    2004. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 305, 968–972, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100103
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ringrose, P.S.
    2017. Principles of sustainability and physics as a basis for the low-carbon energy transition. Petroleum Geoscience, 23, 287–297, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2016-060
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Stephenson, M.H.
    2018. Energy and Climate Change: An Introduction to Geological Controls, Interventions and Mitigations. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error