1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Petroleum Geoscience
  4. Volume 28, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 28, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:
PDF

Abstract

Knowledge of subsurface formation pressures is critical for the calibration of predictions and models needed for safe drilling of deep wells, historically for oil and gas wells. The same details apply to the sequestration of CO, ephemeral storage of gases such as hydrogen and for geothermal power. An estimated 10–14% of wells globally experience an unexpected influx of formation fluid, indicative of the controlling mud in the borehole at that time having a lower pressure than the surrounding formation. The drilling events, known as kicks and wellbore breathing, lead to, at best, downtime on the drilling rig which might affect the economic viability of the well, or in the extreme its safety with possible loss of life such as in the case of an uncontrolled blowout. Not all kicks are of equivalent value: dynamic and static kicks can be classified with a high degree of confidence and may become values for true formation pressure. Other types of fluid influx during drilling, including swab kicks and wellbore breathing, need to be identified and will not be accepted in a kick database. These types of influx may be eliminated as potential formation pressure values but, along with mud weights, can be valuable data to constrain the range of possible formation pressures, of significant where no other data exist. A new, rigorous evaluation procedure for determining formation pressure is presented, and compared with direct pore pressure measurements (e.g. RFT, MDT, RCI values). The comparison shows that the proposed methodology illustrates typical uncertainty of about 10 bar (145 psi) pressure over the full range of pressures for which data are available in this study.

This article is part of the Geopressure collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geopressure

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London for GSL and EAGE

[open-access]

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-061
2022-03-21
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-061
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/pg/28/2/petgeo2021-061.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-061&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bois, M., Grosjean, Y. and De Pazzis, L. 1994. Shale compaction and abnormal pressure evaluation application to the offshore Mahakam. Indonesian Petroleum Association Twenty Third Annual Convention & Exhibition, October 1994, 6.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowers, G.L . 1995. Pore pressure estimation from the velocity data: accounting for overpressure mechanisms besides undercompaction. SPE Drilling and Completion, 89–95. SPE 27488, https://doi.org/10.2118/27488-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruce, B. and Bowers, G . 2002. Pore pressure terminology. The Leading Edge, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1452607
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlsen, F. 2021. Trends in Risk Level in the Petroleum Activity: The Norwegian Shelf – Summary Report 2020. Petroleum Safety Authority Norway.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Eaton, B.A . 1975. The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, SPE 5544.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Foster, J.B. and Whalen, J.E . 1966. Estimation of formation pressures from electrical surveys -Offshore Louisiana. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 18, 165–171, https://doi.org/10.2118/1200-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Hottman, C.E. and Johnson, R.K . 1965. Estimation of formation pressures from log-derived shale properties. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 15, 717–722, https://doi.org/10.2118/1110-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Mouchet, J.P. and Mitchell, A . 1989. Abnormal pressures while drilling. Manuels Technique elf Aquitaine, 2, 264 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Pinkston, F.W.M. and Flemings, P.B . 2019. Overpressure at the Macondo well and its impact on the Deepwater Horizon blowout. Scientific Report, 9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42496-0
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Sagala, A. and Tingay, M . 2012. Analysis of overpressure and its generating mechanisms in the Northern Carnarvon Basin from drilling data. APPEA Journal, 52, 683–683, https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ11097
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Swarbrick, R.E . 2002. Challenges of porosity-based pore pressure prediction. CSEG Recorder, 27, 74–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Swarbrick, R.E . 2012. Review of pore pressure prediction challenges in high-temperature areas. Leading Edge, 31, 1288–1294, https://doi.org/10.1190/tle31111288.1
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Swarbrick, R.E., O'Connor, S.A. and Lahann, R.W . 2005. Maximizing geological information from pressure tests and depth plots. Oil and Gas Journal, 2005, 32–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Tare, U.A., Whitfill, D.L. and Mody, F.K. 2001. Drilling fluid losses and gains: case histories and practical solutions. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September–3 October 2001. SPE paper No. 71368.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Tingay, M.R.P., Hillis, R.R., Swarbrick, R.E., Morley, C.K. and Damit, A.R . 2009. Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province, Brunei. AAPG Bulletin, 93, 51–74, https://doi.org/10.1306/08080808016
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Ruth, P., Hillis, R.R., Tingate, M.R.P. and Swarbrick, R.E 2003. The origin of overpressure in ‘old’ sedimentary basins: an example from the Cooper Basin, Australia. Geofluids, 3, 125–131, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-8123.2003.00055.x
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Ward, C. and Clark, R . 1998. Anatomy of a ballooning borehole using PWD. Overpressures in Petroleum Exploration. Bulletin Recherches Elf Exploration Production, Memoir, 22, 213–220.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-061
Loading
Kicks and their significance in pore pressure prediction
Petroleum Geoscience 28, petgeo2021-061 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2021-061
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-061
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-061
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error