1887
Volume 28, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Mudrock compaction trends from the Rovuma Basin offshore Mozambique are compared with those of the Norwegian North Sea, the Gulf of Mexico and the Kutai Basin offshore Indonesia. The comparison reveals that burial rates and timing of rifting are the dominant causes for the differences observed. The compaction trend for the Rovuma Basin is broadly similar to the trends for the Kutai Basin and the Gulf of Mexico, but very different from those for the Norwegian North Sea data, which show higher porosity and shallower onset of overpressure than those from the other three basins. The relationships for seismic velocities as a function of depth show strong similarities between the Rovuma and Gulf of Mexico basins.

These comparisons are used to make a general assessment of the capillary sealing potential of Cretaceous mudrocks in the Rovuma Basin, using a mudstone permeability-prediction function and a method for mapping permeability to threshold pressure, allowing estimation of maximum column heights for CO and CH, with uncertainty ranges. Predicted CO column heights are slightly less than the equivalent CH column heights. The observed CH column height at one of the wells is significantly lower than that predicted from mudstone permeability, which is probably due to other factors such as fracturing or gas migration out of the structure. The comparison indicates generally good capillary sealing potential for the Rovuma Basin Cretaceous shales and offers a general approach for assessing CO storage potential from hydrocarbon sealing datasets from multiple offshore basins.

This article is part of the Energy Geoscience Series available at https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/energy-geoscience-series

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-101
2022-06-27
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baig, I., Faleide, J.I., Mondol, N.H. and Jahren, J.2019. Burial and exhumation history controls on shale compaction and thermal maturity along the Norwegian North Sea basin margin areas. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 104, 61–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.03.010
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg, R.R.1975. Capillary pressures in stratigraphic traps. AAPG Bulletin, 59, 939–956.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bjørlykke, K.1998. Clay mineral diagenesis in sedimentary basins – a key to the prediction of rock properties. Examples from the North Sea Basin. Clay Minerals, 33, 15–34, https://doi.org/10.1180/000985598545390
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bjørlykke, K. and Hoeg, K.1997. Effects of burial diagenesis on stresses, compaction and fluid flow in sedimentary basins. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 14, 267–276, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(96)00051-7
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolås, H.M.N. and Hermanrud, C.2003. Hydrocarbon leakage processes and trap retention capacities offshore Norway. Petroleum Geoscience, 9, 321–332, https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079302-549
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolås, H.M.N., Hermanrud, C. and Teige, G.M.2004. Origin of overpressures in shales: Constraints from basin modeling. AAPG Bulletin, 88, 193–211, https://doi.org/10.1306/10060302042
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Busch, A. and Amann-Hildenbrand, A.2013. Predicting capillarity of mudrocks. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 45, 208–223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.05.005
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Casey, B., Germaine, J.T., Flemings, P.B., Reece, J.S., Gao, B. and Betts, W.2013. Liquid limit as a predictor of mudrock permeability. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 44, 256–263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.04.008
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Castagna, J.P., Batzle, M.L. and Eastwood, R.L.1985. Relationship between compressional-wave and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks. Geophysics, 50, 571–581, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441933
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chambers, J.L.C., Carter, I. and Cloke, R.2004. Thin-skinned and thick-skinned inversion-related thrusting – a structural model for the Kutai Basin, Kalimantan, Indonesia. AAPG Memoirs, 82, 614–634, https://doi.org/10.1306/M82813C32
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chuhan, F.A., Kjeldstad, A., Bjørlykke, K. and Høeg, K.2002. Porosity loss in sand by grain crushing – experimental evidence and relevance to reservoir quality. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 19, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(01)00049-6
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Davison, I. and Steel, I.2017. Geology and hydrocarbon potential of the East African continental margin: a review. Petroleum Geoscience, 24, 57–91, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2017-028
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Divins, D.L.2003. Total Sediment Thickness of the World's Oceans and Marginal Seas. NOAA National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eaton, B.A.1975. The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs. Paper SPE-5544-MS presented at theFall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, 28 September–1 October 1975, Dallas, Texas, USA, https://doi.org/10.2118/5544-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fossen, H., Khani, H.F., Faleide, J.I., Ksienzyk, A.K. and Dunlap, W.J. 2016. Post-Caledonian extension in the West Norway–northern North Sea region: the role of structural inheritance. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 439, 465–486 , https://doi.org/10.1144/SP439.6
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Francis, M., Milne, G., Kornpihl, K.D., Tewari, S., Rathee, D., Barlass, D. and Broadbent, K.2017. Petroleum systems of the deepwater Mozambique Basin. First Break, 35, https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.35.6.89456
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Frizon de Lamotte, D., Fourdan, B., Leleu, S., Leparmentier, F. and de Clarens, P.2015. Style of rifting and the stages of Pangea breakup. Tectonics, 34, 1009–1029, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014TC003760
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gaarenstroom, L., Tromp, R.A.J. and Brandenburg, A.M.1993. Overpressures in the Central North Sea: implications for trap integrity and drilling safety. Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series, 4, 1305–1313, https://doi.org/10.1144/0041305
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Glennie, K.W. (ed.) 2009. Petroleum Geology of the North Sea: Basic Concepts and Recent Advances. 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goulty, N.R., Ramdhan, A.M. and Jones, S.J.2012. Chemical compaction of mudrocks in the presence of overpressure. Petroleum Geoscience, 18, 471–479, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2012-018
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hildenbrand, A., Schlömer, S., Krooss, B.M. and Littke, R.2004. Gas breakthrough experiments on pelitic rocks: comparative study with N2, CO2 and CH4. Geofluids, 4, 61–80, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-8123.2004.00073.x
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Iglauer, S., Pentland, C.H. and Busch, A.2015. CO2 wettability of seal and reservoir rocks and the implications for carbon geo-sequestration. Water Resources Research, 51, 729–774, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015553
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Karolyte, R., Johnson, G., Yielding, G. and Gilfillan, S.M.2020. Fault seal modelling-the influence of fluid properties on fault sealing capacity in hydrocarbon and CO2 systems. Petroleum Geoscience, 26, 481–497, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2019-126
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lander, R.H. and Walderhaug, O.1999. Predicting porosity through simulating sandstone compaction and quartz cementation. AAPG Bulletin, 83, 433–449.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Leverett, M.C.1941. Capillary behaviour in porous solids. Transactions of the AIME, 142, 152–169, https://doi.org/10.2118/941152-G
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lundin, E.R., Doré, A.G. and Redfield, T.F.2018. Magmatism and extension rates at rifted margins. Petroleum Geoscience, 24, 379–392, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2016-158
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Macgregor, D., Argent, J. and Sansom, P.2018. Introduction to the thematic set: tectonics and petroleum systems of East Africa. Petroleum Geoscience, 24, 3–7, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2017-105
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mahanjane, E.S.2014. The Davie Fracture Zone and adjacent basins in the offshore Mozambique Margin – a new insights for the hydrocarbon potential. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 57, 561–571, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.06.015
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Manzocchi, T., Heath, A.E., Walsh, J.J. and Childs, C.2002. The representation of two-phase fault-rock properties in flow simulation models. Petroleum Geoscience, 8, 119–132, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.8.2.119
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mondol, N.H., Bjørlykke, K., Jahren, J. and Høeg, K.2007. Experimental mechanical compaction of clay mineral aggregates – changes in physical properties of mudstones during burial. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 24, 289–311, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.03.006
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Morris, S., Vestal, B., O'Neill, K., Moretti, M., Franco, C., Hitchings, N., Zhang, J. and Grace, J.D.2015. The pore pressure regime of the northern Gulf of Mexico: Geostatistical estimation and regional controls. AAPG Bulletin, 99, 91–118, https://doi.org/10.1306/07221413148
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Naylor, M., Wilkinson, M. and Haszeldine, R.S.2011. Calculation of CO2 column heights in depleted gas fields from known pre-production gas column heights. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 28, 1083–1093, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.10.005
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nhabanga, O.J. and Ringrose, P.S.2019. Assessment of mudstone compaction in exploration wells in the Rovuma Basin, Offshore Mozambique. Heliyon, 5, e02641, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02641
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Nhabanga, O., Ringrose, P.S. and Holt, R.M.2021. Use of rock-physics analysis of well logs to determine compaction history of Cretaceous Shales in the Rovuma Basin, Offshore Mozambique. Geophysical Prospecting, 69, 1282–1294, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13104
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Poupon, A., Clavier, C., Dumanoir, J., Gaymard, R. and Misk, A.1970. Log analysis of sand–shale sequences – a systematic approach. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 22, 867–881, https://doi.org/10.2118/2897-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ramdhan, A.M. and Goulty, N.R.2017. Two-step wireline log analysis of overpressure in the Bekapai Field, Lower Kutai Basin, Indonesia. Petroleum Geoscience, 24, 208–217, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2017-045
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ramm, M.1992. Porosity–depth trends in reservoir sandstones: theoretical models related to Jurassic sandstones offshore Norway. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 9, 553–567, https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(92)90066-N
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ringrose, P.S., Sorbie, K.S., Corbett, P.W.M. and Jensen, J.L.1993. Immiscible flow behaviour in laminated and cross-bedded sandstones. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 9, 103–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-4105(93)90071-L
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ringrose, P.S. and Meckel, T.A.2019. Maturing global CO2 storage resources on offshore continental margins to achieve 2DS emissions reductions. Scientific Reports, 9, 17944, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54363-z
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schlömer, S. and Krooss, B.M.1997. Experimental characterisation of the hydrocarbon sealing efficiency of cap rocks. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 14, 565–580, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(97)00022-6
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schowalter, T.T.1974. Mechanics of secondary hydrocarbon migration and entrapment. AAPG Bulletin, 63, 723–760.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sclater, J.G. and Christie, P.F.1980. Continental stretching: an explanation of the Post-Mid Cretaceous subsidence of the Central North Sea Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 85, 3711–3739, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB085iB07p03711
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Snedden, J.W. and Galloway, W.E.2019. The Gulf of Mexico Sedimentary Basin: Depositional Evolution and Petroleum Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Storvoll, V. and Brevik, I.2008. Identifying time, temperature, and mineralogical effects on chemical compaction in shales by rock physics relations. The Leading Edge, 27, 750–756, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2944160
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Swarbrick, R.2012. Review of pore-pressure prediction challenges in high-temperature areas. The Leading Edge, 31, 1288–1294, https://doi.org/10.1190/tle31111288.1
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Swarbrick, R.E. and Osborne, M.J.1998. Mechanisms that generate abnormal pressures: an overview. AAPG Memoirs, 70, 13–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Takach, N.E., Barker, C. and Kemp, M.K.1987. Stability of natural gas in the deep subsurface: thermodynamic calculation of equilibrium compositions. AAPG Bulletin, 71, 322–333.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. van Oort, E., Hale, A.H., Mody, F.K. and Sanjit, R.1996. Transport in shales and the design of improved water-based shale drilling fluids. SPE Drilling & Completion, 11, 137–146, https://doi.org/10.2118/28309-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Whittaker, J.M., Goncharov, A., Williams, S.E., Müller, R.D. and Leitchenkov, G.2013. Global sediment thickness data set updated for the Australian-Antarctic Southern Ocean. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 14, 3297–3305, https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20181
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Worden, R.H. and Burley, S.D.2003. Sandstone diagenesis: the evolution of sand to stone. International Association of Sedimentologists Reprint Series, 4, 1–44, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304459.ch
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Xie, F., Wu, Q. et al.2019. Passive continental margin basins and the controls on the formation of evaporites: a case study of the Gulf of Mexico Basin. Carbonates Evaporites, 34, 405–418, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-017-0404-z
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang, Y. and Aplin, A.C.2010. A permeability–porosity relationship for mudstones. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 1692–1697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.07.001
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, J.2011. Pore pressure prediction from well logs: methods, modifications, and new approaches. Earth-Science Reviews, 108, 50–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.06.001
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhou, M.Y. and Sheng, P.1989. First-principles calculations of dynamic permeability in porous media. Physical Review B, 39, 12027, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.39.12027
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-101
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-101
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error