1887
Volume 29, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:
PDF

Abstract

Assessing fault zones as fluid-migration pathways requires the characterization of permeability both across and along faults, as well as the adjacent volume. The hydraulic properties of the Vette Fault Zone, North Sea, are described by modelling the mixing of host-rock lithologies into the fault zone, and the fault width is derived from empirical relationships as a function of throw and clay content. To better understand the sensitivity related to the uncertainties in overburden lithologies and fault-width correlations, a parametric study with 1125 model realizations were solved in a 2D steady-state, single-phase, subsurface flow model. The fault zone, included as a discrete permeable structure, significantly alters the flow field compared to a model that only considers lithological juxtaposition. The most prominent hydraulic communication in the Vette Fault Zone is downwards from the storage reservoir where sand is mixed into the fault zone. Increasing the host-rock permeability in the overburden also increases the fault permeability and shifts the inflection point for down-fault flow, causing the pressurized reservoir to drain towards the overburden and the top surface. For CO storage application, the models highlighted the potential for downward communication along the fault for brine, and the CO capillary sealing towards the overburden.

This article is part of the Fault and top seals 2022 collection available at: www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/fault-and-top-seals-2022

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London for GSL and EAGE

[open-access]

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-033
2023-07-17
2026-01-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-033
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/pg/29/3/petgeo2023-033.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-033&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alaei, B. and Torabi, A.2017. Seismic imaging of fault damaged zone and its scaling relation with displacement. Interpretation, 5, SP83–SP93, https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2016-0230.1
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bense, V.F. and Person, M.A.2006. Faults as conduit-barrier systems to fluid flow in siliciclastic sedimentary aquifers. Water Resources Research, 42, W05421, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004480
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bense, V.F. and Van Balen, R.2004. The effect of fault relay and clay smearing on groundwater flow patterns in the Lower Rhine Embayment. Basin Research, 16, 397–411, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2004.00238.x
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bjørnarå, T.I., Haines, E. and Skurtveit, E.2021. Upscaled geocellular flow model of potential across- and along-fault leakage using shale gouge ratio. Presented atTCCS-11, Trondheim Conference on CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage, 21–23 June 2021, Trondheim, Norway.
  5. Bjørnarå, T.I., Skurtveit, E., Michie, E. and Smith, S.A.2022. Overburden fluid migration along the Vette Fault Zone, North Sea, using different fault permeability models. In: Proceedings of the the Sixth International Conference on Fault and Top Seals, Vienna. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers (EAGE), Houten, The Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202243033
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouvier, J., Kaars-Sijpesteijn, C., Kluesner, D., Onyejekwe, C. and Van der Pal, R.1989. Three-dimensional seismic interpretation and fault sealing investigations, nun river field, Nigeria. AAPG Bulletin, 73, 1397–1414, https://doi.org/10.1306/44B4AA5A-170A-11D7-8645000102C1865D
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Braathen, A., Tveranger, J. et al.2009. Fault facies and its application to sandstone reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin, 93, 891–917, https://doi.org/10.1306/03230908116
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Childs, C., Walsh, J.J. et al.2007. Definition of a fault permeability predictor from outcrop studies of a faulted turbidite sequence, Taranaki, New Zealand. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 292, 235–258, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP292.14
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dietrich, P., Helmig, R., Sauter, M., Hötzl, H., Köngeter, J. and Teutsch, G.2005. Flow and Transport in Fractured Porous Media. Springer, Berlin.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fachri, M., Tveranger, J., Braathen, A. and Schueller, S.2013. Sensitivity of fluid flow to deformation-band damage zone heterogeneities: a study using fault facies and truncated Gaussian simulation. Journal of Structural Geology, 52, 60–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2013.04.005
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Færseth, R.B., Johnsen, E. and Sperrevik, S.2007. Methodology for risking fault seal capacity: implications of fault zone architecture. AAPG Bulletin, 91, 1231–1246, https://doi.org/10.1306/03080706051
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Farrell, N., Healy, D. and Taylor, C.2014. Anisotropy of permeability in faulted porous sandstones. Journal of Structural Geology, 63, 50–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.02.008
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Faulkner, D.R.2004. A model for the variation in permeability of clay-bearing fault gouge with depth in the brittle crust. Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L19611, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020736
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Faulkner, D.R. and Rutter, E.H.1998. The gas permeability of clay-bearing fault gouge at 20°C. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 147, 147–156, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.147.01.10
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Faulkner, D., Jackson, C., Lunn, R., Schlische, R., Shipton, Z., Wibberley, C. and Withjack, M.2010. A review of recent developments concerning the structure, mechanics and fluid flow properties of fault zones. Journal of Structural Geology, 32, 1557–1575, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2010.06.009
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fossen, H., Schultz, R.A., Shipton, Z.K. and Mair, K.2007. Deformation bands in sandstone: a review. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 164, 755–769, https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492006-036
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Foxford, K., Walsh, J., Watterson, J., Garden, I.R., Guscott, S. and Burley, S.1998. Structure and content of the Moab Fault Zone, Utah, USA, and its implications for fault seal prediction. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 147, 87–103, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.147.01.06
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Fredman, N., Tveranger, J., Semshaug, S., Braathen, A. and Sverdrup, E.2007. Sensitivity of fluid flow to fault core architecture and petrophysical properties of fault rocks in siliciclastic reservoirs: a synthetic fault model study. Petroleum Geoscience, 13, 305–320, https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079306-721
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Freeman, S., Harris, S. and Knipe, R.2010. Cross-fault sealing, baffling and fluid flow in 3D geological models: tools for analysis, visualization and interpretation. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 347, 257–282, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP347.15
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gassnova2012. Troll Kystnær Subsurface Report. Gassnova SF Technical Report TL02-ROS-Z-RA-0005, https://co2datashare.org/dataset/smeaheia-dataset/resource/1285a81c-a0a2-417d-9805-01e3d3f14fc2
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jolley, S.J., Dijk, H., Lamens, J.H., Fisher, Q.J., Manzocchi, T., Eikmans, H. and Huang, Y.2007. Faulting and fault sealing in production simulation models: Brent Province, northern North Sea. Petroleum Geoscience, 13, 321–340, https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079306-733
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Knipe, R., Freeman, S., Harris, S. and Davies, R.2004. Structural uncertainty and scenario modelling for fault seal analysis. In: AAPG 2004 Annual Convention Abstracts Volume. American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), Tulsa, OK, A77.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Knott, S.D.1993. Fault seal analysis in the North Sea. AAPG Bulletin, 77, 778–792, https://doi.org/10.1306/BDFF8D58-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lehner, F. and Pilaar, W.1997. The emplacement of clay smears in synsedimentary normal faults: inferences from field observations near Frechen, Germany. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 7, 39–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-8937(97)80005-7
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lindsay, N., Murphy, F., Walsh, J., Watterson, J., Flint, S. and Bryant, I.1993. Outcrop studies of shale smears on fault surfaces. Special Publications of the International Association of Sedimentologists, 15, 113–123, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444303957.ch6
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lunne, T., Long, M. and Uzielli, M.2006. Characterisation and engineering properties of Troll clay. In: Tan, T.S., Phoon, K.K., Hight, D.W. and Leroueil, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, Singapore, Volume 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1939–1972.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Manzocchi, T., Walsh, J.J., Nell, P. and Yielding, G.1999. Fault transmissibility multipliers for flow simulation models. Petroleum Geoscience, 5, 53–63, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.5.1.53
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Michie, E.A.H., Kaminskaite, I., Cooke, A., Fisher, Q., Yielding, G. and Tobiss, S.2021a. Along-strike permeability variation in carbonate-hosted fault zones. Journal of Structural Geology, 142, 104236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104236
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Michie, E.A.H., Mulrooney, M.J. and Braathen, A.2021b. Fault interpretation uncertainties using seismic data, and the effects on fault seal analysis: a case study from the Horda Platform, with implications for CO2 storage. Solid Earth, 12, 1259–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1259-2021
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Mondol, N.H., Fawad, M. and Park, J.2018. Petrophysical analysis and rock physics diagnostics of Sognefjord Formation in the Smeaheia area, Northern North Sea. In: Fifth CO2 Geological Storage Workshop. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers (EAGE), Houten, The Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802951
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mulrooney, M.J., Osmond, J.L., Skurtveit, E., Faleide, J.I. and Braathen, A.2020. Structural analysis of the Smeaheia fault block, a potential CO2 storage site, northern Horda Platform, North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 121, 104598, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104598
     [Google Scholar]
  32. NPD FactPages2022. 31/6-6. NPD FactPages, Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Stavanger, Norway, https://factpages.npd.no/nb-no/wellbore/PageView/Exploration/All/127 [accessed 2 March 2022].
  33. Osmond, J., Mulrooney, M., Skurtveit, E. and Braathen, A.2020. Analogous juxtaposition of mixed lithologies against a siliciclastic hydrocarbon reservoir and proposed CO2 storage formation in the Norwegian North Sea.Search and Discovery Article #80721, 2019 AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, 19–22 May 2019, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Osmond, J.L., Mulrooney, M.J., Holden, N., Skurtveit, E., Faleide, J.I. and Braathen, A.2022. Structural traps and seals for expanding CO2 storage in the northern Horda platform, North Sea. AAPG Bulletin, 106, 1711–1752, https://doi.org/10.1306/03222221110
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Pei, Y., Paton, D.A., Knipe, R.J. and Wu, K.2015. A review of fault sealing behaviour and its evaluation in siliciclastic rocks. Earth-Science Reviews, 150, 121–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.07.011
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Rahman, M.J., Choi, J.C., Fawad, M. and Mondol, N.H.2021. Probabilistic analysis of Vette fault stability in potential CO2 storage site Smeaheia, offshore Norway. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 108, 103315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103315
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ringrose, P.S., Thorsen, R. et al.2017. Ranking and risking alternative CO2 storage sites offshore Norway. In: Fourth Sustainable Earth Sciences Conference. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers (EAGE), Houten, The Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201702142
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Schueller, S., Braathen, A., Fossen, H. and Tveranger, J.2013. Spatial distribution of deformation bands in damage zones of extensional faults in porous sandstones: statistical analysis of field data. Journal of Structural Geology, 52, 148–162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2013.03.013
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Skurtveit, E., Aker, E., Soldal, M., Angeli, M. and Wang, Z.2012. Experimental investigation of CO2 breakthrough and flow mechanisms in shale. Petroleum Geoscience, 18, 3–15, https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079311-016
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Skurtveit, E., Grande, L. et al.2015. Mechanical testing and sealing capacity of the Upper Jurassic Draupne Formation, North Sea. Paper ARMA-2015-331 presented at the49th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, 28 June–1 July 2015, San Francisco, California, USA.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Soldal, M., Skurtveit, E. and Choi, J.C.2021. Laboratory evaluation of mechanical properties of draupne shale relevant for CO2 seal integrity. Geosciences, 11, 244, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11060244
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Spencer, A. and Larsen, V.1990. Fault traps in the northern North Sea. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 55, 281–298, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1990.055.01.13
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sperrevik, S., Gillespie, P.A., Fisher, Q.J., Halvorsen, T. and Knipe, R.J.2002. Empirical estimation of fault rock properties. In: Koestler, A.G. and Hunsdale, R. (eds) Hydrocarbon Seal Quantification, Volume 11 of Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, Elsevier, 109–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-8937(02)80010-8
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Statoil2016. Selected Extracts from Statoil Internal Report on Subsurface Evaluation of Smeaheia as Part of 2016 Feasibility Study on CO2 Storage in the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Statoil ASA Technical Report OED 15/1785, https://doi.org/10.11582/2021.00012
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sundal, A., Hellevang, H., Miri, R., Dypvik, H., Nystuen, J.P. and Aagaard, P.2014. Variations in mineralization potential for CO2 related to sedimentary facies and burial depth–a comparative study from the North Sea. Energy Procedia, 63, 5063–5070, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.536
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Torabi, A. and Berg, S.S.2011. Scaling of fault attributes: A review. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 28, 1444–1460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.04.003
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Worden, R.H., Allen, M.J. et al.2020. Lower Cretaceous Rodby and Palaeocene Lista shales: characterisation and comparison of top-seal mudstones at two planned CCS sites, offshore UK. Minerals, 10, 691, https://doi.org/10.3390/min10080691
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, L., Thorsen, R., Ottesen, S., Meneguolo, R., Hartvedt, K., Ringrose, P. and Nazarian, B.2021. Significance of fault seal in assessing CO2 storage capacity and containment risks – an example from the Horda Platform, northern North Sea. Petroleum Geoscience. 27, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2020-102
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Wu, L., Skurtveit, E. et al.2022. Containment risk assessment and management of CO2 storage on the Horda platform. Proceedings of the 16th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference (GHGT-16), https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4272132
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Yielding, G., Freeman, B., and Needham, D.T.1997. Quantitative fault seal prediction. AAPG Bulletin, 81, 897–917, https://doi.org/10.1306/522B498D-1727-11D7-8645000102C1865D
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Yielding, G., Øverland, J.A. and Byberg, G.1999. Characterization of fault zones for reservoir modeling: an example from the Gullfaks field, northern North Sea. AAPG Bulletin, 83, 925–951, https://doi.org/10.1306/E4FD2E29-1732-11D7-8645000102C1865D
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Yielding, G., Bretan, P. and Freeman, B.2010. Fault seal calibration: a brief review. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 347, 243–255, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP347.14
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-033
Loading
Characterizing along- and across-fault fluid-flow properties for assessing flow rates and overburden fluid migration along faults: a case study from the North Sea
Petroleum Geoscience 29, petgeo2023-033 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2023-033
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-033
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-033
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error