1887
Volume 29, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Forward modelling of sedimentary systems is a method that simulates sedimentation processes over geological time to generate a set of facies distributed in a depositional space. The objective of using forward modelling in this work was to build a 3D facies model from which a synthetic seismic simulation was generated, and then to analyse the relation of seismic-stratigraphic interpretations with the knowledge of the generated sedimentological model. This modelling methodology was applied in a pre-salt field in the Santos Basin, Brazilian offshore, focused on the Barra Velha Formation. The modelling parameters used were: (i) the initial surface of bathymetric depth; (ii) the lake-level variation; (iii) the subsidence map; and (iv) the deposition rates of the facies. Average-constant of acoustic impedance values were assigned to each facies and a synthetic seismic was obtained. With the facies and synthetic models available, it was possible to analyse: (i) the distribution of thicknesses and proportion of facies by region; (ii) the vertical stacking pattern and lateral facies variation; (iii) the Wheeler distance  time diagram; and (iv) the seismic reflector patterns through the seismic facies classification. Through these analyses it was possible to better understand the possibilities and limitations of seismic stratigraphy as an interpretation auxiliary tool in pre-salt carbonate environments.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-069
2023-10-19
2026-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K. and Richards, P.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ANP2022. Boletim da Produção de Petróleo e Gás Natural, 2022, 148(Dezembro).
  3. Avseth, P., Mukerji, T. and Mavko, G.2005. Quantitative Seismic Interpretation: Applying Rock Physics Tools to Reduce Interpretation Risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511600074
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benac, P., Faria, D.L., Yamamoto, T., Maul, A. and Guizan, G.2023. Acoustic impedance statistics for carbonate facies using well information in the pre-salt of Santos Basin. 18th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, 16–19 October 2023, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berra, F., Lanfranchi, A., Smart, P.L., Whitaker, F.F. and Ronchi, P.2016. Forward modelling of carbonate platforms: Sedimentological and diagenetic constraints from an application to a flat-topped greenhouse platform (Triassic, Southern Alps, Italy). Marine and Petroleum Geology, 78, 636–655, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.10.011
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosence, D.W., Pomar, L., Waltham, D.A. and Lankester, T.H.1994. Computer modeling a Miocene carbonate platform, Mallorca, Spain. AAPG Bulletin, 78, 247–266, https://doi.org/10.1306/BDFF9078-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Catuneanu, O.2020. Chapter 23 - Sequence stratigraphy. In:Scarselli, N., Adam, J., Chiarella, D., Roberts, D.G. and Bally, A.W. (eds) Regional Geology and Tectonics. Volume 1: Principles of Geologic Analysis. 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 605–686, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64134-2.00021-3
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang, H., Kowsmann, R., Figueiredo, A. and Bender, A.1992. Tectonics and stratigraphy of the East Brazil Rift system: an overview. Tectonophysics, 213, 97–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(92)90253-3
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, A.S., Talbot, M.R., Awramik, S.M., Dettman, D.L. and Abell, P.1997. Lake level and paleoenvironmental history of Lake Tanganyika, Africa as inferred from late Holocene and modern stromatolites. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 109, 444–460, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0444:LLAPHO>2.3.CO;2
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Contreras, J., Zühlke, R., Bowman, S. and Bechstädt, T.2010. Seismic stratigraphy and subsidence analysis of the southern Brazilian margin (Campos, Santos and Pelotas basins). Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 1952–1980, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.06.007
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cross, T.A. and Lessenger, A.M.1988. Seismic stratigraphy. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 16, 319–354, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.16.050188.001535
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dunham, R.J.1962. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. AAPG Memoirs, 1, 108–122, https://doi.org/10.1306/M1357
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fagin, S.W.1991. Seismic Modeling of Geologic Structures: Applications to Exploration Problems. Geophysical Development Series, 2. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802754
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Faria, D.L.P.2017. Modelagem estratigráfico-sedimentológica da distribuição espacial de fácies sedimentares em reservatório carbonático aptiano da bacia de Santos. Master's dissertation, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Faria, D.L.P., Reis, A.T. and Souza, O.G.2017. Three-dimensional stratigraphic-sedimentological forward modeling of an Aptian carbonate reservoir deposited during the sag stage in the Santos basin, Brazil. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 88, 676–695, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.09.013
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Francis, A.M. and Hicks, G.J.2010. Reservoir connectivity and fluid uncertainty analysis using fast geostatistical seismic inversion. In: GEO2010 9th Middle East Geoscience Conference and Exhibition, Manama, Bahrain. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Houten, The Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.248.098
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Garcia, S.F.M., Danderfer Filho, A., Lamotte, D.F. and Rudiewicz, J.L.2012. Análise de Volumes de Sal em Restauração Estrutural: um Exemplo na Bacia de Santos. Revista Brasileira de Geociências, São Paulo, 42, 433–450, https://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/3923
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Granjeon, D.2014. 3D forward modelling of the impact of sediment transport and base level cycles on continental margins and incised valleys. International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publications, 46, 453–472, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118920435.ch16
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hosken, J.W.J.1988. Ricker wavelets in their various guises. First Break, 6, 24–33, https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.1988002
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Johann, P.R.S. and Monteiro, R.C.2016. Geophysical reservoir characterization and monitoring at Brazilian PreSalt Oil fields. Paper OTC-27246-MS presented at theOffshore Technology Conference, 2–5 May 2016, Houston, Texas, USA, https://doi.org/10.4043/27246-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lamont, M.G., Thompson, T.A. and Bevilacqua, C.2008. Drilling success as a result of probabilistic lithology and fluid prediction – a case study in the Carnarvon Basin, WA. APPEA Journal, 48, 31–42, https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ07004
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lawrence, D.T., Doyle, M. and Aigner, T.1990. Stratigraphic simulation of sedimentary basins: Concepts and calibration. AAPG Bulletin, 74, 273–295, https://doi.org/10.1306/0C9B22C7-1710-11D7-8645000102C1865D
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Leandro, C.G., Savian, J.F. et al.2022. Astronomical tuning of the Aptian stage and its implications for age recalibrations and paleoclimatic events. Nature Communications, 13, 2941, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30075-3
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Matthews, R.K. and Frohlich, C.1987. Forward modeling of bank-margin carbonate diagenesis. Geology, 15, 673–676, https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15<673:FMOBCD>2.0.CO;2
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Maul, A., Bulcão, A. et al.2021. Benefits of inserting salt stratification to detail velocity model prior to least-squares reverse-time migration. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 195, 104469, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104469
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mello, V.L. and Lupinacci, W.M.2022. Mineralogy based classification of carbonate rocks using elastic parameters: A case study from Buzios Field. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 209, 109962, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109962
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Miall, A.D.1985. Architectural-element analysis: A new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits. Earth-Science Reviews, 22, 261–308, https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(85)90001-7
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mohriak, W., Szatmari, P. and Anjos, S.M.C.2012. Salt: geology and tectonics of selected Brazilian basins in their global context. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 363, 131–135, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP363.7
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Moreira, J.L.P., Madeira, C.V., Gil, J.A. and Machado, M.A.P.2007. Bacia de Santos. Boletim de Geociências da Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, 15, 531–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pereira, M.J.1990. Análise estratigráfica e depositional das formações Itajaí superior e Juréia inferior (Mesoturoniano/Eo-Santoniano), Bacia de Santos, Brasil. Master's dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pietzsch, R., Oliveira, D.M., Tedeschi, L.R., Neto, J.V.Q., Figueiredo, M.F., Vazquez, J.C. and Souza, R.S.2018. Palaeohydrology of the Lower Cretaceous pre-salt lacustrine system, from rift to post-rift phase, Santos Basin, Brazil. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 507, 60–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.06.043
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Russell, B.H.1988. Introduction to Seismic Inversion Methods. Course Notes Series, 2. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802303
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Schreiber, B.C., Lugli, S. and Bąbel, M. (eds) 2007. Evaporites Through Space and Time. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 285, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP285
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Simm, R. and Bacon, M.2014. Seismic Amplitude: An Interpreter's Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511984501
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Terra, G.G.S., Spadini, A.R. et al.2010. Classificação de rochas carbonáticas aplicável as bacias sedimentares brasileiras. Boletim Geociências da Petrobras, 18, 9–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Waltham, D.1992. Mathematical modelling of sedimentary basin processes. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 9, 265–273, https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(92)90075-P
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Walther, J.1894. Einleitung in die Geologie als historische Wissenschaft. In: Lithogenesis der Gegenwart, Band 3. G. Fischer, Jena, Germany, 535–1055.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Warren, J.K.2006. Evaporites: Sediments, Resources and Hydrocarbons. Springer, Berlin, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32344-9
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Warrlich, G.M.D., Waltham, D.A. and Bosence, D.W.J.2002. Quantifying the sequence stratigraphy and drowning mechanisms of atolls using a new 3-D forward stratigraphic modelling program (CARBONATE 3D). Basin Research, 14, 379–400, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2117.2002.00181.x
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wheeler, H.E.1958. Time-stratigraphy. AAPG Bulletin, 42, 1047–1063, https://doi.org/10.1306/0BDA5AF2-16BD-11D7-8645000102C1865D
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Widess, M.B.1973. How Thin Is a Thin Bed?Geophysics, 38, 1176–1180, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440403
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Winter, W.R., Jahnert, R.J. and Fança, A.B.2007. Bacia de Campos. Boletim de Geociências da Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, 15, 511–529.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yilmaz, O.2001. Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801580
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-069
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-069
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error