1887
Volume 31, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The main Aptian pre-salt facies were modelled in 3D pore scale to evaluate the impact of diagenetic textures; specifically, the influence of matrix-replacive dolomite on the pore-system development. Our objective is to evaluate how these textures affect residual oil saturation ( ) under water- and oil-wet conditions through pore-scale simulations. We developed 12 models with varying proportions of dolomite and calcite spherulites, three models with calcite shrubs, 21 models with shrubs and regularly spaced dolomite, and nine models with shrubs and heterogeneously arranged dolomites. The methodology involved evaluating the tortuosity, surface area and size distribution of pores and throats. Additionally, the quasi-static morphology method was used to estimate the . The results indicated that dolomite significantly affects the pore system, leading to a more uniform medium, a decrease in the throat/pore size ratio and an increase in surface area. An increase of dolomite decreases in water-wet conditions. Conversely, in oil-wet simulations, increasing dolomite leads to an increase in oil entrapment. Previous research on waterflood experiments concluded that facies with a high content of replacive dolomite tend to show low . Hence, it is probable that much of the oil trapped in these rocks is a result of the snap-off under water- or mixed-wet conditions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-125
2025-03-28
2026-02-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, W.G. 1985. Wettability literature survey – part 1: Rock–oil–brine interactions and the effects of core handling on wettability. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 38, 1125–1144, doi: 10.2118/13932-PA10.2118/13932‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/13932-PA [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, W.G.1987. Wettability literature survey – part 6: The effects of wettability on waterflooding. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 39, 1605–1622, doi: 10.2118/16471-PA10.2118/16471‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/16471-PA [Google Scholar]
  3. Armelenti, G., Goldberg, K., Kuchle, J. and De Ros, L.F.2016. Deposition, diagenesis and reservoir potential of non-carbonate sedimentary rocks from the Rift Section of Campos Basin, Brazil. Petroleum Geoscience, 22, 223–239, doi: 10.1144/petgeo2015-03510.1144/petgeo2015‑035
    https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2015-035 [Google Scholar]
  4. Austin, J.A.J. and Uchupi, E.1982. Continental–oceanic crustal transition off southwest Africa. AAPG Bulletin, 66, 1328–1347, doi: 10.1306/03B5A79B-16D1-11D7-8645000102C1865D10.1306/03B5A79B‑16D1‑11D7‑8645000102C1865D
    https://doi.org/10.1306/03B5A79B-16D1-11D7-8645000102C1865D [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakke, S. and Øren, P.-E.1997. 3-D pore-scale modelling of sandstones and flow simulations in the pore networks. SPE Journal, 2, 136–149, doi: 10.2118/35479-PA10.2118/35479‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/35479-PA [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnett, A.J., Obermaier, M., Amthor, J., Sharafodin, M., Bolton, M., Clarke, D. and Camara, R.2021. Origin and significance of thick carbonate grainstone packages in nonmarine successions: a case study from the Barra Velha Formation, Santos Basin, Brazil. AAPG Memoirs, 124, 155–174, doi: 10.1306/13722318msb.6.185310.1306/13722318msb.6.1853
    https://doi.org/10.1306/13722318msb.6.1853 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blunt, M.J.2017. Multiphase Flow in Permeable Media: A Pore-Scale Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, doi: 10.1017/978131614509810.1017/9781316145098
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145098 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brito, J.P.S., Santos, R.V. et al.2024. U–Pb dating of Barra Velha carbonates reveals the influence of Santos Basin sedimentary and tectonothermal history on pre-salt carbonate ages. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 168, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2024.10703510.1016/j.marpetgeo.2024.107035
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2024.107035 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bryant, S., Cade, C. and Mellor, D.1993. Permeability prediction from geologic models. AAPG Bulletin, 77, 1338–1350, doi: 10.1306/BDFF8E84-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D10.1306/BDFF8E84‑1718‑11D7‑8645000102C1865D
    https://doi.org/10.1306/BDFF8E84-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D [Google Scholar]
  10. Carramal, N.G., Oliveira, D.M. et al.2022. Paleoenvironmental insights from the deposition and diagenesis of Aptian pre-salt magnesium silicates from the Lula Field, Santos Basin, Brazil. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 92, 12–31, doi: 10.2110/jsr.2020.13910.2110/jsr.2020.139
    https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2020.139 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carvalho, A.S.G.C. and De Ros, L.F.2015. Diagenesis of Aptian sandstones and conglomerates of the Campos Basin. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 125, 189–200, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.11.01910.1016/j.petrol.2014.11.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.11.019 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carvalho, A.M.A., Hamon, Y., Gomes De Souza, O., Jr, Goulart Carramal, N. and Collard, N.2022. Facies and diagenesis distribution in an Aptian pre-salt carbonate reservoir of the Santos Basin, offshore Brazil: A comprehensive quantitative approach. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 141, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.10570810.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105708
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105708 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chandler, R., Koplik, J., Lerman, K. and Willemsen, J.F.1982. Capillary displacement and percolation in porous media. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 119, 249–267, doi: 10.1017/S002211208200133510.1017/S0022112082001335
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112082001335 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang, M.M., Maerefat, N.L., Tomutsa, L. and Honarpour, M.M.1988. Evaluation and comparison of residual oil saturation determination techniques. SPE Formation Evaluation, 3, 251–262, doi: 10.2118/14887-PA10.2118/14887‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/14887-PA [Google Scholar]
  15. Chinelatto, G.F., Belila, A.M.P., Basso, M., Souza, J.P.P. and Vidal, A.C.2020. A taphofacies interpretation of shell concentrations and their relationship with petrophysics: a case study of Barremian–Aptian coquinas in the Itapema Formation, Santos Basin – Brazil. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 116, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.10431710.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104317
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104317 [Google Scholar]
  16. da Silva, M.D., Gomes, M.E.B. et al.2021. Mineralogical study of levels with magnesian clay minerals in the Santos Basin, Aptian pre-salt Brazil. Minerals, 11, doi: 10.3390/min1109097010.3390/min11090970
    https://doi.org/10.3390/min11090970 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Ros, L.F. and Oliveira, D.M.2023. An operational classification system for the South Atlantic pre-salt rocks. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 93, 693–704, doi: 10.2110/jsr.2022.10310.2110/jsr.2022.103
    https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2022.103 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ehrenberg, S.N., Eberli, G.P., Keramati, M. and Moallemi, S.A.2006. Porosity–permeability relationships in interlayered limestone–dolostone reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin, 90, 91–114, doi: 10.1306/0810050508710.1306/08100505087
    https://doi.org/10.1306/08100505087 [Google Scholar]
  19. Flannery, B.P., Deckman, H.W., Roberge, W.G. and D'amico, K.L.1987. Three-dimensional X-ray microtomography. Science, 237, 1439–1444, doi: 10.1126/science.237.4821.143910.1126/science.237.4821.1439
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.237.4821.1439 [Google Scholar]
  20. GeoDict2024. Geodict Simulation Software Release 2024. Math2Market GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany, doi: 10.30423/release.geodict202410.30423/release.geodict2024
    https://doi.org/10.30423/release.geodict2024 [Google Scholar]
  21. Godeau, N., Girard, J.-P., Guihou, A., Hamelin, B. and Deschamps, P.2021. U–Pb and Th–Pb dating of diagenetic/hydrothermal phases in the pre-salt series, Angola offshore: implication for the paleo-thermal history during South Atlantic rifting. Goldschmidt Abstracts, 2021, doi: 10.7185/gold2021.737210.7185/gold2021.7372
    https://doi.org/10.7185/gold2021.7372 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gomes, J.P., Bunevich, R.B., Tedeschi, L.R., Tucker, M.E. and Whitaker, F.F.2020. Facies classification and patterns of lacustrine carbonate deposition of the Barra Velha Formation, Santos Basin, Brazilian Pre-salt. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 113, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.10417610.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104176
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104176 [Google Scholar]
  23. Herlinger, R., Jr and Dos Santos, B.C.C.2018. The impact of pore type on NMR T2 and MICP in bioclastic carbonate reservoirs. Paper SPWLA-2018-GGG presented at theSPWLA 59th Annual Logging Symposium, June 2–6, 2018, London, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Herlinger, R., Jr and Vidal, A.C.2022. X-ray μCt extracted pore attributes to predict and understand Sor using ensemble learning techniques in the Barra Velha Pre-salt carbonates, Santos Basin, Offshore Brazil. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 212, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.11028210.1016/j.petrol.2022.110282
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110282 [Google Scholar]
  25. Herlinger, R., Jr, Zambonato, E.E. and De Ros, L.F.2017. Influence of diagenesis on the quality of Lower Cretaceous pre-salt lacustrine carbonate reservoirs from Northern Campos Basin, Offshore Brazil. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 87, 1285–1313, doi: 10.2110/jsr.2017.7010.2110/jsr.2017.70
    https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2017.70 [Google Scholar]
  26. Herlinger, R., Jr, Do Nascimento Freitas, G., Dos Anjos, C.D.W., Petróleo Brasileiro, S.A. and De Ros, L.F.2020. Petrological and petrophysical implications of magnesian clays in Brazilian Pre-Salt deposits. Paper SPWLA-5004 presented at theSPWLA 61st Annual Logging Symposium, Virtual Online Webinar, June 24–July 29 2020, doi: 10.30632/SPWLA-500410.30632/SPWLA‑5004
    https://doi.org/10.30632/SPWLA-5004 [Google Scholar]
  27. Herlinger, R., Jr, De Ros, L.F., Surmas, R. and Vidal, A.2023. Residual oil saturation investigation in Barra Velha Formation reservoirs from the Santos Basin, Offshore Brazil: A sedimentological approach. Sedimentary Geology, 448, doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2023.10637210.1016/j.sedgeo.2023.106372
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2023.106372 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hilpert, M. and Miller, C.T.2001. Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in totally wetting porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 24, 243–255, doi: 10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00056-710.1016/S0309‑1708(00)00056‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00056-7 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoeiland, S., Barth, T., Blokhus, A.M. and Skauge, A.2001. The effect of crude oil acid fractions on wettability as studied by interfacial tension and contact angles. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 30, 91–103, doi: 10.1016/S0920-4105(01)00106-110.1016/S0920‑4105(01)00106‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(01)00106-1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hosa, A. and Wood, R.2020. Order of diagenetic events controls evolution of porosity and permeability in carbonates. Sedimentology, 67, 3042–3054, doi: 10.1111/sed.1273310.1111/sed.12733
    https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12733 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hosa, A., Wood, R.A., Corbett, P.W.M., Schiffer de Souza, R. and Roemers, E.2020. Modelling the impact of depositional and diagenetic processes on reservoir properties of the crystal-shrub limestones in the ‘Pre-Salt’ Barra Velha Formation, Santos Basin, Brazil. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 112, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.10410010.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104100
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104100 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kendall, A.1977. Fascicular-optic calcite: a replacement of bundled acicular carbonate cements. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 47, 1056–1062.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Leite, C. de O.N., Silva, C.M. de A. and de Ros, L.F.2020. Depositional and diagenetic processes in the pre-salt rift section of a Santos Basin area, SE Brazil. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 90, 584–608, doi: 10.2110/jsr.2020.2710.2110/jsr.2020.27
    https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2020.27 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lima, B.E.M. and De Ros, L.F.2019. Deposition, diagenetic and hydrothermal processes in the Aptian Pre-Salt lacustrine carbonate reservoirs of the northern Campos Basin, offshore Brazil. Sedimentary Geology, 383, 55–81, doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2019.01.00610.1016/j.sedgeo.2019.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2019.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lima, B.E.M., Tedeschi, L.R., Pestilho, A.L.S., Santos, R.V., Vazquez, J.C., Guzzo, J.V.P. and De Ros, L.F.2020. Deep-burial hydrothermal alteration of the Pre-Salt carbonate reservoirs from northern Campos Basin, offshore Brazil: evidence from petrography, fluid inclusions, Sr, C and O isotopes. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 113, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.10414310.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104143
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104143 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ling, K. and He, J.2012. A new correlation to calculate oil–water interfacial tension. Paper SPE-163328-MS presented at theSPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, December 10–12, 2012, Kuwait City, Kuwait, doi: 10.2118/163328-MS10.2118/163328‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/163328-MS [Google Scholar]
  37. Lucia, F.J.2004. Origin and petrophysics of dolostone pore space. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 235, 141–155, doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.235.01.0610.1144/GSL.SP.2004.235.01.06
    https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.235.01.06 [Google Scholar]
  38. Luo, P. and Machel, H.G.1995. Pore size and pore throat types in a heterogeneous dolostone reservoir, Devonian Grosmont Formation, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. AAPG Bulletin, 79, 1698–1720, doi: 10.1306/7834DE5E-1721-11D7-8645000102C1865D10.1306/7834DE5E‑1721‑11D7‑8645000102C1865D
    https://doi.org/10.1306/7834DE5E-1721-11D7-8645000102C1865D [Google Scholar]
  39. Machel, H.2004. Concepts and models of dolomitization: a critical reappraisal. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 235, 7–63, doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.235.01.0210.1144/GSL.SP.2004.235.01.02
    https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.235.01.02 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mehmani, A., Verma, R. and Prodanović, M.2020. Pore-scale modeling of carbonates. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 114, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.10414110.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104141
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104141 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mizusaki, A.M.P., Thomaz Filho, A. and Cesero, P.1998. Ages of the magmatism and the opening of the South Atlantic Ocean. Pesquisas em Geociências, 25, 47–57, doi: 10.22456/1807-9806.2116610.22456/1807‑9806.21166
    https://doi.org/10.22456/1807-9806.21166 [Google Scholar]
  42. Moreira, J.L.P., Madeira, C., Gil, J. and Machado, M.2007. Bacia de Santos. Boletim de Geociências da Petrobras da Petrobras, 15, 531–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mountjoy, E.W. and Marquez, X.M.1997. Predicting reservoir properties in dolomites: Upper Devonian Leduc buildups, deep Alberta Basin. AAPG Memoirs, 69, 267–306, doi: 10.1306/M69613C1710.1306/M69613C17
    https://doi.org/10.1306/M69613C17 [Google Scholar]
  44. Netto, P.R.A., Pozo, M., da Silva, M.D., Mexias, A.S., Gomes, M.E.B., Borghi, L. and Rios-Netto, A.M.2022. Authigenic Mg-clay assemblages in the Barra Velha Formation (Upper Cretaceous) from Santos Basin (Brazil): the role of syngenetic and diagenetic process. Applied Clay Science, 216, doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2021.10633910.1016/j.clay.2021.106339
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2021.106339 [Google Scholar]
  45. Nürnberg, D. and Müller, R.D.1991. The tectonic evolution of the South Atlantic from Late Jurassic to present. Tectonophysics, 191, 27–53, doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(91)90231-G10.1016/0040‑1951(91)90231‑G
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(91)90231-G [Google Scholar]
  46. Ohser, J. and Mücklich, F.2000. Statistical Analysis of Microstructures in Materials Science. 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Øren, P.-E. and Bakke, S.2002. Process based reconstruction of sandstones and prediction of transport properties. Transport in Porous Media, 46, 311–343, doi: 10.1023/A:101503112233810.1023/A:1015031122338
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015031122338 [Google Scholar]
  48. Perkins, F.M.1957. An investigation of the role of capillary forces in laboratory water floods. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 9, 49–51, doi: 10.2118/840-g10.2118/840‑g
    https://doi.org/10.2118/840-g [Google Scholar]
  49. Rabinowitz, P.D. and LaBrecque, J.1979. The Mesozoic South Atlantic Ocean and evolution of its continental margins. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84, 5973–6002, doi: 10.1029/JB084iB11p0597310.1029/JB084iB11p05973
    https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB11p05973 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rathmell, J.J., Braun, P.H. and Perkins, T.K.1973. Reservoir waterflood residual oil saturation from laboratory tests. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 25, 175–185, doi: 10.2118/3785-PA10.2118/3785‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/3785-PA [Google Scholar]
  51. Rehim, H., Mizusaki, A.M.P., Carvalho, M.D. and Monteiro, M.1986. Talco e estevensita na Formação Lagoa Feia da Bacia de Campos – Possíveis implicações no ambiente deposicional. In: Anais do XXXIV Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia. Goiânia, Goiás, 1986, Vol. 1. Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia, São Paulo, Brazil, 416–424.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rochelle-Bates, N., Wood, R., Schröder, S. and Roberts, N.M.W.2022. In situ U–Pb geochronology of Pre-Salt carbonates reveals links between diagenesis and regional tectonics. Terra Nova, 34, 271–277, doi: 10.1111/ter.1258610.1111/ter.12586
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12586 [Google Scholar]
  53. Roof, F.G.1970. Snap-off of oil droplets in water-wet pores. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 10, 85–90, doi: 10.2118/2504-pa10.2118/2504‑pa
    https://doi.org/10.2118/2504-pa [Google Scholar]
  54. Saller, A., Rushton, S., Buambua, L., Inman, K., Mcneil, R. and Dickson, J.A.D.T.2016. Presalt stratigraphy and depositional systems in the Kwanza Basin, offshore Angola. AAPG Bulletin, 100, 1135–1164, doi: 10.1306/0211161521610.1306/02111615216
    https://doi.org/10.1306/02111615216 [Google Scholar]
  55. Teklu, T.W., Brown, J.S., Kazemi, H., Graves, R.M. and AlSumaiti, A.M.2013. A critical literature review of laboratory and field scale determination of residual oil saturation. Paper SPE-164483-MS presented at theSPE Production and Operations Symposium, March 23–26, 2013, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, doi: 10.2118/164483-MS10.2118/164483‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/164483-MS [Google Scholar]
  56. Thompson, D.L., Stilwell, J.D. and Hall, M.2015. Lacustrine carbonate reservoirs from Early Cretaceous rift lakes of Western Gondwana: pre-Salt coquinas of Brazil and West Africa. Gondwana Research, 28, 26–51, doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2014.12.00510.1016/j.gr.2014.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2014.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  57. Torskaya, T., Shabro, V., Torres-Verdín, C., Salazar-Tio, R. and Revil, A.2014. Grain shape effects on permeability, formation factor, and capillary pressure from pore-scale modeling. Transport in Porous Media, 102, 71–90, doi: 10.1007/s11242-013-0262-710.1007/s11242‑013‑0262‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-013-0262-7 [Google Scholar]
  58. Tosca, N.J. and Masterson, A.L.2014. Chemical controls on incipient Mg-silicate crystallization at 25°C: implications for early and late diagenesis. Clay Minerals, 49, 165–194, doi: 10.1180/claymin.2014.049.2.0310.1180/claymin.2014.049.2.03
    https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.2014.049.2.03 [Google Scholar]
  59. Tosca, N.J. and Wright, V.P.2014. The formation and diagenesis of Mg-clay minerals in lacustrine carbonate reservoirs. Search and Discovery Article #51002, 2014 AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, April 6–9, 2014, Houston, Texas, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. van der Land, C., Wood, R., Wu, K., van Dijke, M.I.J., Jiang, Z., Corbett, P.W.M. and Couples, G.2013. Modelling the permeability evolution of carbonate rocks. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 48, 1–7, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.07.00610.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wardlaw, N.C.1976. Pore geometry of carbonate rocks as revealed by pore casts and capillary pressure. AAPG Bulletin, 60, 245–257, doi: 10.1306/83d922ad-16c7-11d7-8645000102c1865d10.1306/83d922ad‑16c7‑11d7‑8645000102c1865d
    https://doi.org/10.1306/83d922ad-16c7-11d7-8645000102c1865d [Google Scholar]
  62. Wardlaw, N.C.1982. The effects of geometry, wettability, viscosity and interfacial tension on trapping in single pore-throat pairs. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 21, doi: 10.2118/82-03-0110.2118/82‑03‑01
    https://doi.org/10.2118/82-03-01 [Google Scholar]
  63. Wardlaw, N.C. and McKellar, M.1981. Mercury porosimetry and the interpretation of pore geometry in sedimentary rocks and artificial models. Powder Technology, 29, 127–143, doi: 10.1016/0032-5910(81)85011-510.1016/0032‑5910(81)85011‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(81)85011-5 [Google Scholar]
  64. Warren, J.2000. Dolomite: occurrence, evolution and economically important associations. Earth-Science Reviews, 52, 1–81, doi: 10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00022-210.1016/S0012‑8252(00)00022‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00022-2 [Google Scholar]
  65. Winter, W.R., Jahnert, R.J. and França, A.B.2007. Bacia de Campos. Boletim de Geociências da Petrobras, 15, 511–529.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Wright, V.P. and Barnett, A.J.2015. An abiotic model for the development of textures in some South Atlantic early Cretaceous lacustrine carbonates. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 418, 209–219, doi: 10.1144/SP418.310.1144/SP418.3
    https://doi.org/10.1144/SP418.3 [Google Scholar]
  67. Wright, V.P. and Barnett, A.J.2020. The textural evolution and ghost matrices of the Cretaceous Barra Velha Formation carbonates from the Santos Basin, offshore Brazil. Facies, 66, 7, doi: 10.1007/s10347-019-0591-210.1007/s10347‑019‑0591‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-019-0591-2 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-125
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-125
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error