1887
Volume 30, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The effective electrical conductivity of organic-rich mudrocks can be influenced by the presence of clay, pyrite, and thermally mature organic matter. In this paper, we investigate the impacts of conductivity, volumetric concentrations, and spatial distribution/connectivity of clay, pyrite, and kerogen networks on the effective conductivity of the rock and how this affects the assessment of water/hydrocarbon saturation. This quantification enables an understanding of when such components need to be considered in interpreting resistivity measurements in organic-rich mudrocks. We perform sensitivity analysis on the impacts of (a) thermal-maturity-dependent kerogen conductivity, (b) volumetric concentration/spatial distribution of kerogen, (c) conductivity and volumetric concentration/spatial distribution of pyrite, and (d) cation exchange capacities of various clay minerals and their concentration/spatial distribution on the effective conductivity of the rock. The sensitivity analysis showed that with increasing pyrite concentration, the effective conductivity of the rock increased. This increment became significant when the concentration of pyrite was above 2%. Lastly, we observed that thermally mature kerogen increased the conductivity of the rock, with a significant increment occurring when the kerogen conductivity was above 0.01 S m. Results confirmed that the incorporation of conductive rock components such as clay, pyrite, and kerogen into the electrical rock physics model improved the estimates of hydrocarbon reserves.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-135
2024-03-13
2024-07-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amsden, T.W.1975. Hunton Group (Late Ordovician, Silurian, and Early Devonian) in the Anadarko Basin of Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 121, 214.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Archie, G.E.1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics, paper SPE-942054-G. Transactions of the AIME, 146, 54–62, https://doi.org/10.2118/942054-G
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Asquith, G.B.1990. Log Evaluation of Shaly Sandstone Reservoirs: A Practical Guide. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Continuing Education Course Note Series, 31, 59.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bateman, R.M.1985. Openhole Log Analysis and Formation Analysis. IHRDC Press, Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, H. and Heidari, Z.2016. Quantifying the directional connectivity of rock constituents and its impact on electrical resistivity of organic-rich Mudrocks. Mathematical Geosciences, 48, 285–303, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-015-9595-9
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, H., Firdaus, G. and Heidari, Z.2014. Impact of anisotropic nature of organic-rich source rocks on electrical resistivity measurements. Paper SPWLA-2014-CCC presented at theSPWLA 55th Annual Logging Symposium, 18–22 May, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Clavier, C., Coates, G. and Dumanoir, J.1984. Theoretical and experimental bases for the dual-water model for interpretation of Shaly Sands, Paper SPE-6859-PA. SPE Journal, 24, 153–168, https://doi.org/10.2118/6859-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dash, S. and Heidari, Z.2021. Enhanced assessment of fluid saturation in the Wolfcamp Formation of the Permian Basin, Paper SPWLA-2021-v62n6a10. Petrophysics, 62, 737–751.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dash, S. and Heidari, Z.2022a. Development of a universal physics-based resistivity model for estimation of fluid content in unconventional and conventional reservoirs. Paper URTEC-3723594-MS presented at theSPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, June, Houston, Texas, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dash, S. and Heidari, Z.2022b. Quantifying the impacts of rock components and their spatial distribution on estimates of hydrocarbon reserves in organic-rich Mudrocks. Paper SPWLA-2022-0073 presented at theSPWLA 63rd Annual Logging Symposium, June, Stavanger, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Denne, R.A. and Breyer, J.A.2016. Regional depositional episodes of the Cenomanian–Turonian Eagle Ford and Woodbine Groups of Texas. In: Breyer, J.A (ed) The Eagle Ford Shale: A Renaissance in U.S. Oil Production. AAPG Memoir, 87–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Garcia, A.P., Heidari, Z. and Rostami, A.2018. A new workflow for improved water saturation assessment in organic-rich Mudrocks honoring rock fabric, Paper SPE-194199-PA. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 21, 837–849, https://doi.org/10.2118/194199-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hammes, U., Hamlin, H.S. and Ewing, T.E.2011. Geologic analysis of the Upper Jurassic Haynesville Shale in east Texas and west Louisiana. AAPG Bulletin, 95, 1643–1666, https://doi.org/10.1306/02141110128
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kethireddy, N., Chen, H. and Heidari, Z.2014. Quantifying the effect of Kerogen on resistivity measurements in organic-rich Mudrocks, Paper SPWLA-2014-v55n2a6. Petrophysics, 55, 136–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Leveaux, J. and Poupon, A.1971. Evaluation of water saturation in Shaly formations, Paper SPWLA-1971-vXIIn4a1. The Log Analyst, 12, 3–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Myers, M.T.1989. Pore modeling: extending the Hanai-Bruggeman equation. Paper SPWLA-1989-D presented at theSPWLA 30th Annual Logging Symposium, 11–14 June, Denver, Colorado, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Oriel, S.S., Myers, A.D. and Crosby, E.1967. West Texas Permian basin region. In:McKee, E. and Oriel, S. (eds) Paleotectonic Investigations of the Permian System in United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 515-A, 21–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pearce, C.I., Pattrick, R.A.D. and Vaughan, D.J.2006. Electrical and magnetic properties of sulfides. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 61, 127–180, https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2006.61.3
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Peeters, M. and Holmes, A.2014. Review of existing Shaly-Sand models and introduction of a new method based on dry-clay parameters. Petrophysics, 55, 543–553.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Poupon, A., Loy, M.E. and Tixier, M.P.1954. A contribution to electric log interpretation in Shaly sands, Paper SPE-311-G. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 6, 27–34, https://doi.org/10.2118/311-G
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pridmore, D.F. and Shuey, R.T.1976. The electrical resistivity of Galena, Pyrite, and Chalcopyrite. American Mineralogist, 61, 248–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Revil, A.1999. Ionic diffusivity, electrical conductivity, membrane and thermoelectric potentials in colloids and granular porous media: a unified model. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 212, 503–522, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1998.6077
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Robinson, K.1988. Petroleum Geology and Hydrocarbon Plays of the Permian Basin Petroleum Province West Texas and Southeast New Mexico. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 88-450-Z, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr88450Z
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sam-Marcus, J., Enaworu, E., Rotimi, O.J. and Seteyeoboot, I.2018. A proposed solution to the determination of water saturation: using a modelled equation. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 8, 1009–1015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-018-0453-4
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Simandoux, P.1963. Dielectric measurements on porous media, application to the measurement of water saturations, study of the behavior of argillaceous formations. Revue de l'Institut Francais du Petrole, 18, 93–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Waxman, M.H. and Smits, L.J.M.1968. Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing Shaly sands, Paper SPE-1863-A. SPE Journal, 8, 107–122, https://doi.org/10.2118/1863-A
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yang, A., Fridaus, G. and Heidari, Z.2016. Electrical resistivity and chemical properties of Kerogen Isolated from organic-rich Mudrocks. Geophysics, 81, D643–D655, https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2016-0071.1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-135
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-135
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error