1887
Volume 30, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

High-resolution image data is instrumental in quantifying the variation of rock fabric in formation evaluation that conventional well logs fail to capture. However, the acquisition of image data for all wells in a reservoir is restricted due to technology limitations and the high cost involved. The main objective of this paper is to propose a workflow to extrapolate rock fabric information from imaged depth intervals/wells to nearby un-imaged depth intervals/wells for enhanced formation evaluation in un-imaged wells. To propagate rock fabric information, we trained a supervised learning algorithm in a well with core photos, CT-scan images, and conventional well logs. Subsequently, the trained model is used to identify fabric-influenced well-log-based rock classes using only conventional well logs in un-imaged depth intervals/well (referred to as fabric-based rock classes). We applied the proposed workflow to two wells in a siliciclastic formation with spatial variation in rock fabric. Comparison of the detected fabric-based rock classes in the nearby depth intervals/well using the trained model with image-based rock classes resulted in an average accuracy of 94%. The outcomes of this paper contribute to accelerated identification of rock types honouring rock fabric while minimizing extensive imaging and coring efforts.

This article is part of the Digitally enabled geoscience workflows: unlocking the power of our data collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/digitally-enabled-geoscience-workflows

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-147
2024-05-30
2024-07-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Obaidi, M., Heidari, Z., Casey, B. and Williams, R.2018. Automatic Well-log-based Fabric-oriented Rock Classification for Optimizing Landing Spots and Completion Intervals in The Midland Basin. Paper CCCC, Transactions, SPWLA 59th Annual Logging Symposium, 2–6 June, London, United Kingdom.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alzubaidi, F., Mostaghimi, P., Swietojanski, P., Clark, S. and Armstrong, R. 2021. Automated lithology classification from drill core images using convolutional neural networks. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 197, 107933, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107933
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Amaefule, J.O., Altunbay, M., Tiab, D., Kersey, D.G. and Keelan, D.K.1993. Enhanced Reservoir Description Using Core and Log Data to Identify Hydraulic (Flow) Units and Predict Permeability in Uncored Intervals/Wells. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 26436, 30 September to 2 October, Houston, Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Archie, G.E. 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the AIME, 146, 54–62, https://doi.org/10.2118/942054-G
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Asfahani, J., Ahmad, Z. and Ghani, B. 2018. Self-organizing map neural networks approach for lithologic interpretation of nuclear and electrical well logs in basaltic environment, Southern Syria. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.008
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Borrer, J.M and Harris, P.M1991. Lithofacies and cyclicity of the yates formation, Permian Basin: implications for reservoir heterogeneity. AAPG Bulletin, 75, 726–779, https://doi.org/10.1306/0C9B283F-1710-11D7-8645000102C1865D
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chavent, M., Lacaille, J., Mourer, A. and Olteanu, M.2021. Handling Correlations in Random Forests: which Impacts on Variable Importance and Model Interpretability. European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning, Virtual Event, 6–8 October.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chawshin, K., Gonzalez, A., Berg, C.F., Varagnolo, D., Heidari, Z. and Lopez, O. 2021. Classifying lithofacies from textural features in whole core CT-scan images. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 24, 341–357, https://doi.org/10.2118/205354-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dash, S. and Heidari, Z.2021. Application of Image Logs for Enhanced Resistivity-Based Water Saturation Assessment in Organic-Rich Mudrocks. Paper 0072, Transactions, SPWLA 62nd Annual Logging Symposium, Virtual Event, 17–20 May, https://doi.org/10.30632/SPWLA-2021-0072
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dubois, M., Bohling, G. and Chakrabarti, S. 2007. Comparison of four approaches to a rock facies classification problem. Computers and Geosciences, 33, 599–617, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAGEO.2006.08.011
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gaymard, R. and Poupon, A. 1968. Response of neutron and formation density logs in hydrocarbon bearing formations. The Log Analyst, 9, 3–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gonzalez, A., Kanyan, L., Heidari, Z. and Lopez, O. 2020. Integrated multiphysics workflow for automatic rock classification and formation evaluation using multiscale image analysis and conventional well logs. Petrophysics, 61, 495–518, https://doi.org/10.30632/PJV61N5-2020a7
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gonzalez, A., Heidari, Z. and Lopez, O.2021. A New Optimization Method for Enhanced Formation Evaluation and Robust Physics-Based Automatic Rock Classification Using High-Resolution CT-Scan Image Data and Conventional Well Logs. Paper 0030, Transactions, SPWLA 62nd Annual Logging Symposium, Virtual Event, 17–20 May, https://doi.org/10.30632/SPWLA-2021-0030
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gonzalez, A., Heidari, Z. and Lopez, O.2022. Data-Driven Algorithms for Image-Based Rock Classification and Formation Evaluation in Formations with Rapid Spatial Variation in Rock Fabric. Paper 1133, Transactions, SPWLA 63rd Annual Logging Symposium Stavanger, 10–15 June, Norway, https://doi.org/10.30632/PJV64N2-2023a2
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Haralick, R.M. and Shanmugam, K. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 6, 610–621, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jungmann, M., Kopal, M., Clauser, C. and Berlage, T. 2011. Multi-class supervised classification of electrical borehole wall images using texture features. Computers & Geosciences, 37, 541–553, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAGEO.2010.08.008
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kassenaar, J.1991. An Application of Principal Components Analysis to Borehole Geophysical Data. Proceedings of the 4th International MGLS/KEGS Symposium on Borehole Geophysics for Minerals, Geotechnical and Groundwater Applications, 18–22 August 1991, Toronto, 211–218, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2017-0016
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Khalifa, M.A. 2005. Lithofacies, Diagenesis and Cyclicity of the ‘Lower Member’ of Khuff Formation (Late Permian), Al Qasim Province, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 25, 719–734, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.05.008
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kullarni, V.Y. and Sinha, P.K. 2013. Random forest classifier: a survey and future research directions. International Journal of Advanced Computing, 36, 1144–1156.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Y. and Sprecher, R. 2006. Facies identification from well logs: a comparison of discriminant analysis and naïve bayes classifier. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 53, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PETROL.2006.06.001
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lloyd, S. 1982. Least Squares Quantization in P DOCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28, 129–137, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G. et al.2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Porwik, P. and Lisowska, A. 2004. The haar-wavelet transform in digital image processing: its status and achievements. Machine Graphics and Vision, 13, 79–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7906(01)00011-8
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sahu, P., Gonzalez, A., Heidari, Z. and Lopez, O.2023. Propagating Image-Based Rock Classes from Cored Wells to Non-Cored Wells Using Supervised Machine Learning for Enhanced Formation Evaluation. SPWLA 64th Annual Logging Symopisum, Lake Conroe, Texas, USA, 10–14 June 2023, https://doi.org/10.30632/SPWLA-2023-0081
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sebtosheikh, M., Motafakkerfard, R., Riahi, M. and Moradi, S. 2014. Separating well log data to train support vector machines for lithology prediction in a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir. Iranian Journal of Oil and Gas Science and Technology, 4, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.22050/IJOGST.2015.9588
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Serra, O.1984. Information on texture: rock description. In: Fundamentals of Well-log Interpretation: The Acquisition of Logging Data. Elsevier, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 15A.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Xu, C., Torres-Verdin, C. and Steel, R.J.2013. Geological Attributes from Conventional Well Logs: Relating Rock Types to Depositional Facies in Deepwater Turbidite Reservoirs. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 September, New Orleans, Louisiana, https://doi.org/10.2118/166178-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Zaimeche, O., Zeddouri Heddam, S. and Kechiched, R. 2020. Lithofacies Prediction in Non-cored Wells from the Sif Fatima Oil Field (Berkine Basin, Southern Algeria): a comparative study of multilayer perceptron neural network and cluster analysis-based approaches. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 166, 103826, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103826
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Vadivel, A., Sural, S. and Majumdar, A.K.2005. Human Color Perception in the HSV Space and Its Application in Histogram Generation for Image Retrieval, Proceedings, Color Imaging X: Processing, Hardcopy, and Applications, 5667, 589–609, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.586823
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-147
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-147
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error