1887
Volume 31, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Low-velocity non-linear flow is the basic form of fluid movement in low-permeability reservoirs; however, most of the current well-test methodologies are developed based on Darcy's flow, which leads to inaccurate interpretation results. In addition, water-injection development and hydraulic fracturing technology are considered the most effective methods for the development of low-permeability reservoirs, whereas the traditional single-well testing model ignores the interference effect of adjacent wells on observation wells, leading to a deviation between the interpretation results and actual reservoir properties. Therefore, research on interference well-testing models based on non-linear flow for vertical fractured wells (VFW) is necessary. In this paper, a new interference well-test model is proposed to study the transient pressure behaviour of a VFW surrounded by multiple adjacent injection wells. The fluid in the matrix system moves in the form of a non-linear flow, but it conforms to Darcy's flow in the fracture system. Hydraulic fractures are unique channels wherein fluid flows from the matrix system into the wellbore. The simulation results reveal that non-linear flow exhibits 20–30% slower pressure propagation and 15–25% lower bottomhole pressure (BHP) during unsteady flow compared with Darcy flow. In steady-state flow, it generates low-pressure zones that are 30–50% broader and requires up to 3.1 MPa greater pressure drops. Typical curves identify four distinct flow regimes (wellbore storage, fracture flow, pore flow and interference flow), with non-linear flow elevating pressure derivatives by 30% in the pore flow and interference stages. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that increasing the fracture half-length (0–90 m) or fracture count (one–four) reduces the BHP by 15–25%. Higher production rates (4–10 m/day) intensify drawdown and suppress interference effects. Expanding well spacing (150–300 m) delays interference onset by 40% and halves its amplitude.

These findings demonstrate that neglecting non-linear effects in low-permeability reservoirs systematically underestimates permeability and overpredicts energy replenishment efficiency. For practical applications, the model advocates optimizing fracture parameters and production strategies to achieve rational field development.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2024-100
2025-11-18
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Khamis, M., Ozkan, E. and Raghavan, R.2001. Interference testing with horizontal observation wells. Paper SPE-71581-MS presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, September 30–October 3, 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, doi: 10.2118/71581-MS10.2118/71581‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/71581-MS [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourdet, D., Whittle, T.M., Douglas, A.A. and Pirard, Y.M.1983. A new set of type curves simplifies well test analysis. World Oil, 196, 95–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao, W., Liu, Y., Cheng, S. and Hassanzadeh, H.2022. Analytical well-test model for hydraulicly fractured wells with multiwell interference in double porosity gas reservoirs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 103, 104624, doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2022.10462410.1016/j.jngse.2022.104624
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104624 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Z.M., Zhou, B. et al.2023. Pressure transient behaviors for horizontal wells with well interferences, complex fractures and two-phase flow. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 227, doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2023.21184510.1016/j.geoen.2023.211845
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211845 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cinco-Ley, H. and Samaniego, V.F.1981. Transient pressure analysis for fractured wells. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 33, 1749–1766, doi: 10.2118/7490-PA10.2118/7490‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/7490-PA [Google Scholar]
  6. Civan, F.2010. Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 82, 375–384, doi: 10.1007/s11242-009-9432-z10.1007/s11242‑009‑9432‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9432-z [Google Scholar]
  7. Dinh, A.V. and Tiab, D.2010. Transient-pressure analysis of a well with an inclined hydraulic fracture using type curve matching. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 13, 845–860, doi: 10.2118/120540-PA10.2118/120540‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/120540-PA [Google Scholar]
  8. Driscoll, V.J.1963. Use of well interference and build-up data for early quantitative determination of reserves, permeability and water influx. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 15, 1127–1136, doi: 10.2118/427-PA10.2118/427‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/427-PA [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao, Y.B., Chu, H.Y. et al.2025. Impact of relative permeability hysteresis on pressure transient behavior and storage capacity in underground gas storage with well interference. Energy, 333, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.13740210.1016/j.energy.2025.137402
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137402 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gringarten, A.C. and Ramey, H.J.1973. The use of source and Green's functions in solving unsteady-flow problems in reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 13, 285–296, doi: 10.2118/3818-PA10.2118/3818‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/3818-PA [Google Scholar]
  11. Guo, J.J., Zhang, S. et al.2012. Well testing analysis for horizontal well with consideration of threshold pressure gradient in tight gas reservoirs. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 24, 561–568, doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60278-310.1016/S1001‑6058(11)60278‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60278-3 [Google Scholar]
  12. He, Y., Cheng, S., Qin, J., Wang, Y., Chen, Z. and Yu, H.2018a. Pressure-transient behavior of multi-segment horizontal wells with nonuniform production: theory and case study. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 140, 093101, doi: 10.1115/1.403987510.1115/1.4039875
    https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039875 [Google Scholar]
  13. He, Y., Cheng, S. et al.2018b. An improved rate-transient analysis model of multi-fractured horizontal wells with non-uniform hydraulic fracture properties. Energies, 11, 393, doi: 10.3390/en1102039310.3390/en11020393
    https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020393 [Google Scholar]
  14. He, Y., Cheng, S. et al.2018c. Analytical interference testing analysis of multi-segment horizontal well. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 171, 919–927, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.08.01910.1016/j.petrol.2018.08.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.08.019 [Google Scholar]
  15. He, Y., Cheng, S. et al.2019. Interference testing model of multiply fractured horizontal well with multiple injection wells. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 176, 1106–1120, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.02.02510.1016/j.petrol.2019.02.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.02.025 [Google Scholar]
  16. Houze, O.P., Horne, R.N. and Ramey, H.J.1988. Pressure-transient response of an infinite-conductivity vertical fracture in a reservoir with double-porosity behavior. SPE Formation Evaluation, 3, 510–518, doi: 10.2118/12778-PA10.2118/12778‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/12778-PA [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang, J. and Younis, R.M.2016. Hybrid coupled discrete-fracture/matrix and multicontinuum models for unconventional-reservoir simulation. SPE Journal, 21, 1009–1027, doi: 10.2118/178430-PA10.2118/178430‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/178430-PA [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiang, R., Li, L., Xu, J., Yang, R. and Zhuang, Y.2012. A nonlinear mathematical model for low-permeability reservoirs and well-testing analysis. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 33, 264–268, doi: 10.7623/syxb20120201110.7623/syxb201202011
    https://doi.org/10.7623/syxb201202011 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuchuk, F.J., Biryukov, D. et al.2015. Pressure transient behavior of horizontal wells intersecting multiple hydraulic and natural fractures in conventional and unconventional unfractured and naturally fractured reservoirs. Paper SPE-175037-MS presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, September 28–30, 2015, Houston, Texas, USA, doi: 10.2118/175037-MS10.2118/175037‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/175037-MS [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, S.T. and Brockenbrough, J.R.1986. A new approximate analytic solution for finite-conductivity vertical fractures. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1, 75–88, doi: 10.2118/12013-PA10.2118/12013‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/12013-PA [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, D.L., Zha, W.S. et al.2016. Pressure transient analysis of low permeability reservoir with pseudo threshold pressure gradient. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 147, 308–316, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.05.03610.1016/j.petrol.2016.05.036
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.05.036 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin, J. and Yang, H.2007a. Analysis of well-test data in a multiwell reservoir with water injection. Paper SPE-110349-MS presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, November 11–14, 2007, Anaheim, California, USA, doi: 10.2118/110349-MS10.2118/110349‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/110349-MS [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin, J. and Yang, H.2007b. Pressure buildup analysis using type curves for a well in a pressure-maintained system. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 15, 6–11, doi: 10.1016/S1004-9541(07)60026-310.1016/S1004‑9541(07)60026‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(07)60026-3 [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, D., Yue, X., Yan, S., Hou, J., Wang, L. and Zhang, J.2005. The effects of adsorbed water layer on flow mechanism in low permeability reservoirs. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 12, 40–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Muskat, M.1938. The flow of homogeneous fluids through porous media. Soil Science, 46, 169, doi: 10.1097/00010694-193808000-0000810.1097/00010694‑193808000‑00008
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193808000-00008 [Google Scholar]
  26. Onur, M., Serra, K.V. and Reynolds, A.C.1991. Analysis of pressure-buildup data from a well in a multiwell system. SPE Formation Evaluation, 6, 101–110, doi: 10.2118/18123-PA10.2118/18123‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/18123-PA [Google Scholar]
  27. Ozkan, E. and Raghavan, R.1991. New solutions for well-test-analysis problems: Part 1 – analytical considerations. SPE Formation Evaluation, 6, 359–368, doi: 10.2118/18615-PA10.2118/18615‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/18615-PA [Google Scholar]
  28. Peaceman, D.W.1983. Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation with nonsquare grid blocks and anisotropic permeability. SPE Journal, 23, 531–543, doi: 10.2118/10528-PA10.2118/10528‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/10528-PA [Google Scholar]
  29. Pertsin, A. and Grunze, M.2004. Water-graphite interaction and behavior of water near the graphite surfaced. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 108, 1357–1364, doi: 10.1021/jp035696810.1021/jp0356968
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0356968 [Google Scholar]
  30. Qin, J., Cheng, S., Li, P., He, Y., Lu, X. and Yu, H.2019. Interference well-test model for vertical well with double-segment fracture in a multi-well system. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 183, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.10641210.1016/j.petrol.2019.106412
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106412 [Google Scholar]
  31. Simpson, M.M. and Janna, W.S.2008. Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids: velocity profiles, viscosity data, and laminar flow friction factor equations for flow in a circular duct. In: ASME 2008 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition Conference Proceedings. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), New York, 173–180, doi: 10.1115/IMECE2008-6761110.1115/IMECE2008‑67611
    https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2008-67611 [Google Scholar]
  32. Tang, X., Chen, Z., Chu, H., Liao, X., Chen, H. and Zhang, J.2019. Well testing interpretation for horizontal well with hydraulic fractures and interconnected micro-fractures. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 179, 546–557, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.07410.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.074
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.074 [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, S., Feng, Q. et al.2015. Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid alkane occurrence state in pores and slits of shale organic matter. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 42, 844–851, doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(15)30081-110.1016/S1876‑3804(15)30081‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(15)30081-1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, Z.P., Ning, Z.F. et al.2024. Modeling transient temperature coupled pressure behavior for waterflooding well with induced fractures: Semi-analytical model, numerical model, and case studies. Geothermics, 121, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.10305510.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103055
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103055 [Google Scholar]
  35. Warren, J.E. and Root, P.J.1963. The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 3, 245–255, doi: 10.2118/426-PA10.2118/426‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/426-PA [Google Scholar]
  36. Xiong, Y., Yu, J., Sun, H., Yuan, J., Huang, Z. and Wu, Y.2017. A new non-Darcy flow model for low-velocity multiphase flow in tight reservoirs. Transport in Porous Media, 117, 367–383, doi: 10.1007/s11242-017-0838-810.1007/s11242‑017‑0838‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-017-0838-8 [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhao, L., Jiang, H. et al.2018. Modeling vertical well in field-scale discrete fracture-matrix model using a practical pseudo inner-boundary model. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 166, 510–530, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.02.06110.1016/j.petrol.2018.02.061
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.02.061 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhao, L., Jiang, H.Q. and Wang, H.2020. Representation of a new physics-based non-Darcy equation for low-velocity flow in tight reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 184, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.10651810.1016/j.petrol.2019.106518
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106518 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2024-100
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2024-100
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error