1887
Volume 31, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Owing to the effects of sedimentation and diagenesis, the complexity and heterogeneity of carbonate ramp deposits pose significant challenges to the seismic prediction of high-quality reservoirs. Conventional seismic prediction workflows for carbonate reservoirs typically rely on horizon flattening, seismic coherent bodies and seismic attributes to delineate geological boundaries, complemented by seismic inversion to convert seismic data into petrophysical properties. However, the low vertical resolution of seismic data has hindered studies on the stacking patterns of shoal bodies and corresponding variations in reservoir quality. In this study, an architecture analysis-based seismic prediction workflow is proposed for carbonate ramp shoal reservoirs in the Upper Cretaceous Hartha Formation of the M Oilfield (Mesopotamia Basin). It integrates reservoir architecture analysis with seismic waveform characteristics, aiming to overcome the limitations of low-resolution seismic data under geological constraints. Specifically, we adapted the architecture analysis method originally developed for fluvial sedimentary systems to carbonate ramp shoal reservoir prediction and identified three ramp shoal facies associations at the fifth-level architecture. Their corresponding seismic waveform features were determined by integrating seismic forward modelling. Subsequently, a favourable reservoir distribution map revealing different shoal-body stacking patterns was generated. High-quality reservoir prediction was further achieved through the intersection of acoustic impedance (P-impedance) and gamma-ray volumes derived from seismic waveform indicator inversion, which revealed the internal reservoir heterogeneity. A total of 90.2% of log-interpreted high-quality reservoirs with thicknesses below the seismic resolution limit were successfully predicted. The research results have been verified by the production performance of development wells, demonstrating their effectiveness in reducing uncertainties associated with reservoir heterogeneity. This study provides a replicable geology–seismic integration workflow for the efficient development of similar carbonate ramp shoal reservoirs.

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London for GSL and EAGE. All rights, including for text and data mining (TDM), artificial intelligence (AI) training, and similar technologies, are reserved. For permissions: https://www.lyellcollection.org/publishing-hub/permissions-policy. Publishing disclaimer: https://www.lyellcollection.org/publishing-hub/publishing-ethics

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2025-015
2025-11-19
2026-01-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2025-015
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahr, W.M.1973. The carbonate ramp: an alternative to the shelf model. Gulf Coast Association Geological Societies Transactions, 23, 221–225.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aigner, T.1985. Storm Depositional Systems. Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ainsworth, R.B.2006. Sequence stratigraphic-based analysis of reservoir connectivity: influence of sealing faults – a case study from a marginal marine depositional setting. Petroleum Geoscience, 12, 127–141, doi: 10.1144/1354-079305-66110.1144/1354‑079305‑661
     https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079305-661 [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen, J.R.L.1983. Studies in fluviatile sedimentation: bars, bar-complexes and sandstone sheets (low-sinuosity braided streams) in the Brownstones (L. Devonian), Welsh Borders. Sedimentary Geology, 33, 237–293, doi: 10.1016/0037-0738(83)90076-310.1016/0037‑0738(83)90076‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(83)90076-3 [Google Scholar]
  5. Amel, H., Jafarian, A., Husinec, A., Koeshidayatullah, A. and Swennen, R.2015. Microfacies, depositional environment and diagenetic evolution controls on the reservoir quality of the Permian Upper Dalan Formation, Kish Gas Field, Zagros Basin. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 67, 57–71, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.04.01210.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.04.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cai, Z. and Jia, Z.1995. Architectural studies of unchannelized marine carbonate shoal. Earth Science – Journal of China University of Geosciences, 20, 290–298.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Carvalho, P.G. de, Cassino, L. et al.2023. Presalt carbonate features interpretation using seismic attributes in a distal portion of the Campos Basin. Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, 16–19 October 2023, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chai, H., Wang, W., Wen, G., Gong, X., Dong, J. and Niu, Z.2023. Application of multistage phase-controlled inversion based on reservoir configuration analysis in reservoir prediction of reef-shoal complex. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 58, 70–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, F., Hu, G., Hu, Y., Xie, C. and Wang, H.2018. Development history and future trends in reservoir architecture research. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 40, 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Q., Liu, Y., Feng, Z., Hou, J., Bao, L. and Liang, Z.2023. The architecture characterization of Braided River Reservoirs in the presence of horizontal wells – an application in a Tight Gas Reservoir in the North Ordos Basin, China. Energies, 16, 7092, doi: 10.3390/en1620709210.3390/en16207092
     https://doi.org/10.3390/en16207092 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, J.X. and Chen, J.2020. Channels and identification method based on frequency fusion. In:Proceedings of SPG/SEG Nanjing 2020 International Geophysical Conference, Nanjing, China, 705–708.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dutta, N.C.2002. Geopressure prediction using seismic data: Current status and the road ahead. Geophysics, 67, 2012–2041, doi: 10.1190/1.152710110.1190/1.1527101
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1527101 [Google Scholar]
  13. Embry, J.-C., Hunt, D.W., Colpaert, A., Dræge, A. and Zahm, L.2021. Seismic facies, stratigraphy, geomorphology, and seismic modelling of a Lower Cretaceous carbonate platform. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 509, 89–104, doi: 10.1144/SP509-2020-1810.1144/SP509‑2020‑18
     https://doi.org/10.1144/SP509-2020-18 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fan, T., Hu, G., Ma, L., Wang, Z., Fan, H. and Liang, X.2017. Application of high-precision uncertainty inversion in meandering river reservoir description. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 53, 573–582.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferreira, D.J.A., Dias, R.M. and Lupinacci, W.M.2021. Seismic pattern classification integrated with permeability – porosity evaluation for reservoir characterization of presalt carbonates in the Buzios Field, Brazil. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 201, 108441, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.10844110.1016/j.petrol.2021.108441
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108441 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fitch, P.J.R., Jackson, M.D., Hampson, G.J. and John, C.M.2014. Interaction of stratigraphic and sedimentological heterogeneities with flow in carbonate ramp reservoirs: impact of fluid properties and production strategy. Petroleum Geoscience, 20, 7–26, doi: 10.1144/petgeo2013-01410.1144/petgeo2013‑014
     https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2013-014 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gayara, A.D. and Mousa, A.K.2015. Sequence stratigraphy and reservoir characterization of the Upper Campanian–Maastrichtian succession, Buzurgan Field, southeastern Iraqi. Iraqi Journal of Science, 56, 1457–1464.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gilham, R.G. and Bristow, C.S.1998. Facies architecture and geometry of a prograding carbonate ramp during the early stage of foreland basin evolution: Lower Eocene sequences, Sierra del Cadi, SE Pyrenees, Spain. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 149, 181–203, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1999.149.01.10
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Guo, C., Chen, D.Z., Song, Y.F., Zhou, X., Yi, D. and Zhang, G.2018. Depositional environments and cyclicity of the Early Ordovician carbonate ramp in the western Tarim Basin (NW China). Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 158, 29–48, doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.02.00610.1016/j.jseaes.2018.02.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hao, J., Wu, S., Yang, J., Zhang, Y. and Sha, X.2023. Application of seismic waveform indicator inversion in the depth domain: a case study of pre-salt thin carbonate reservoir prediction. Energies, 16, 3073, doi: 10.3390/en1607307310.3390/en16073073
     https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073073 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hendry, J., Burgess, P., Hunt, D., Janson, X. and Zampetti, V. (eds) 2021. Seismic Characterization of Carbonate Platforms and Reservoirs. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 509, doi: 10.1144/SP50910.1144/SP509
     https://doi.org/10.1144/SP509 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hu, X., Fan, T. et al.2014. Depositional combination characteristics and distribution of Ordovician carbonate shoals in the Tarim Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 32, 418–428, doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2014.03.00610.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2014.03.006
     https://doi.org/10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2014.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, Q., Fu, M., Zhao, L., Zhou, W. and Wang, Y.2019. Characteristics of the reservoirs in carbonate ramp facies from the Upper Cretaceous, HF oilfield, Iraq. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 37, 371–378, doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.19110.14027/j.issn.1000‑0550.2018.191
     https://doi.org/10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.191 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kirchberger, L. and Spitzer, R.2012. Enhancing vertical seismic resolution by spectral inversion. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abu Dhabi, UAE, doi: 10.2118/162216-MS10.2118/162216‑MS
     https://doi.org/10.2118/162216-MS [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, Q., Luo, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, L., Yang, Y. and Huang, H.2020. High-resolution Bayesian sequential stochastic inversion of wave impedance. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 389–397, doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2020.02.01810.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000‑7210.2020.02.018
     https://doi.org/10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2020.02.018 [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, S., Shi, G., Jiang, N., Hu, H., Li, R. and Yu, Y.2021. Identification of bioclastic beach, Maokou Formation of Langzhong area, northern Sichuan Basin. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 56, 815–825, doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2021.04.01510.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000‑7210.2021.04.015
     https://doi.org/10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2021.04.015 [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, X., Zhang, T. and Li, H.2019. Integrated prediction on the distribution of reef beach in the depositional environment of low-energy deepwater slopes in the Amu Darya Right Bank Block. Natural Gas Industry, 39, 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Y., Wu, S., Hou, J. and Liu, J.2017. Progress and prospects of reservoir development geology. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 44, 603–614, doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(17)30069-110.1016/S1876‑3804(17)30069‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(17)30069-1 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lipparini, L., Trippetta, F., Ruggieri, R., Brandano, M. and Romi, A.2018. Oil distribution in outcropping carbonate-ramp reservoirs (Maiella Mountain, Central Italy): three-dimensional models constrained by dense historical well data and laboratory measurements. AAPG Bulletin, 102, 1273–1298, doi: 10.1306/0926171720210.1306/09261717202
     https://doi.org/10.1306/09261717202 [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, L., Wang, F. and Liu, Y.2015. Application of seismic sedimentology to organic reef-bank body identification in Y district. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 36, 342–346.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lv, Z., Du, X. et al.2022. Diagenetic facies and geological modeling of porous carbonate reservoir of the Upper Cretaceous Hartha Formation in H Oilfield, Iraq. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 27, 21–32, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2022.01.00310.3969/j.issn.1672‑9854.2022.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2022.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ma, Y.2007. Generation mechanism of Puguang Gas Field in Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 28, 9–14, 21, doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(07)60034-610.1016/S1872‑5813(07)60034‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5813(07)60034-6 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mahmoud, H.A., Beatriz, B., Luis, P., Marcos, A. and Michele, M.2013. Facies heterogeneity at interwell-scale in a carbonate ramp, Upper Jurassic, NE Spain. Marine & Petroleum Geology, 44, 140–163, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.03.00410.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.03.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  34. Makhloufi, Y., Collin, P.Y. et al.2013. Impact of sedimentology and diagenesis on the petrophysical properties of a tight oolitic carbonate reservoir. The case of the Oolithe Blanche Formation (Bathonian, Paris Basin, France). Marine and Petroleum Geology, 48, 323–340, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.08.02110.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.08.021
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.08.021 [Google Scholar]
  35. Miall, A.D.1985. Architectural-element analysis: a new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits. Earth-Science Reviews, 22, 261–308, doi: 10.1016/0012-8252(85)90001-710.1016/0012‑8252(85)90001‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(85)90001-7 [Google Scholar]
  36. Morris, J., Hampson, G.J. and Maxwell, G.2003. Controls on facies architecture in the Brent Group, Strathspey Field, UK North Sea: implications for reservoir characterization. Petroleum Geoscience, 9, 209–220, doi: 10.1144/1354-079302-50410.1144/1354‑079302‑504
     https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079302-504 [Google Scholar]
  37. Naeini, E.Z. and Nasseri, J.2019. Facies-based seismic inversion for a field development plan. The Leading Edge, 38, 770–779, doi: 10.1190/tle38100770.110.1190/tle38100770.1
     https://doi.org/10.1190/tle38100770.1 [Google Scholar]
  38. Palma, R.M., Lopez-Gomez, J. and Piethe, R.D.2007. Oxfordian ramp system (La Manga Formation) in the Bardas Blancas area (Mendoza Province) Neuquén Basin, Argentina: facies and depositional sequences. Sedimentary Geology, 195, 113–134, doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2006.07.00110.1016/j.sedgeo.2006.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2006.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Petrovic, A. and Aigner, T.2017. Are shoal reservoirs discrete bodies? A coquina shoal outcrop analogue from the Mid Triassic Upper Muschelkalk, SW Germany. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 40, 249–275, doi: 10.1111/jpg.1267510.1111/jpg.12675
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12675 [Google Scholar]
  40. Petrovic, A., Aigner, T. and Pontiggia, M.2017. Heterogeneities of carbonate ramp reservoir – characterization and modelling of a shoal outcrop analogue (Mid-Triassic). First EAGE Workshop on Evaluation and Drilling of Carbonate Reservoirs, 4–6 October 2017, Potsdam, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Petrovic, A., Aigner, T. and Pontiggia, M.2018. Facies heterogeneities in a ramp carbonate reservoir analogue: a new high-resolution approach for 3D facies modelling. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 41, 155–174, doi: 10.1111/jpg.1269810.1111/jpg.12698
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12698 [Google Scholar]
  42. Qin, G., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Lan, Y. and Hong, L.2021. Sedimentary characteristics and main controlling factors of Paleogene marine delta reservoir in H Oilfield, Iraq. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 28, 25–33, doi: 10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2021.03.00310.13673/j.cnki.cn37‑1359/te.2021.03.003
     https://doi.org/10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2021.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rajabi, A., Afshari Moein, M.J. and Rabbani, A.R.2015. Improvement of petrophysical evaluation in a gas bearing carbonate reservoir. A case in Persian Gulf. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 24, 238–244, doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.03610.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.036
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.036 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rankey, E.C.2017. Seismic architecture and seismic geomorphology of heterozoan carbonates: Eocene–Oligocene, Browse Basin, Northwest Shelf, Australia. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 82, 424–443, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.02.01110.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.02.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sabouhi, M., Rezaee, P. and Khatibi, S.2020. An integrated approach to distribute carbonate reservoir properties, using lithofacies and seismic attributes: a case study from SW of Iran. Carbonates and Evaporites, 35, doi: 10.1007/s13146-020-00649-710.1007/s13146‑020‑00649‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-020-00649-7 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sadooni, F.N.2005. The nature and origin of Upper Cretaceous basin-margin rudist buildups of the Mesopotamian Basin, southern Iraq, with consideration of possible hydrocarbon stratigraphic entrapment. Cretaceous Research, 26, 213–224, doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2004.11.01610.1016/j.cretres.2004.11.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2004.11.016 [Google Scholar]
  47. Shekhar, R., Sahni, I. et al.2014. Modelling and simulation of a Jurassic carbonate ramp outcrop, Amellago, High Atlas Mountains, Morocco. Petroleum Geoscience, 20, 109–123, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2013-010
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Sheriff, R.E. and Geldart, L.P.1995. Exploration Seismology. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Tian, Y., Hong, X., Zhang, X., Wang, H., Zhang, L., Guo, T. and Yu, X.2017. Sedimentary characteristics, distribution regularities and main controlling factors of carbonate intra-platform shoal reservoirs: a case study of intra-platform shoal gas fields in the Amu Darya Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 24, 312–321, doi: 10.13745/j.esf.yx.2016-11-5710.13745/j.esf.yx.2016‑11‑57
     https://doi.org/10.13745/j.esf.yx.2016-11-57 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang, H., Zhou, Q., Zhou, W., Zhang, Y. and He, J.2022. Carbonate platform reef–shoal reservoir architecture study and characteristic evaluation: a case of S Field in Turkmenistan. Energies, 15, 226, doi: 10.3390/en1501022610.3390/en15010226
     https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010226 [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu, Z., Shen, C. et al.2016. Architecture characterization for sandy braided river reservoir and controlling factors of remaining oil distribution: a case study of P Oilfield (Neogene), Bohai offshore. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 34, 375–385, doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.02.01610.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.02.016
     https://doi.org/10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.02.016 [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang, Z.L.2020. Interpretation technique of seismic geomorphological slice and its application. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 669–677, doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2020.03.02310.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000‑7210.2020.03.023
     https://doi.org/10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2020.03.023 [Google Scholar]
  53. Yao, J., Chen, X., Zhou, G., Tan, K., Le, X. and Xu, L.2023. Reef-bank body reservoir prediction method for Suining high zone in Changxing Formation, Sichuan Basin. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 58, 196–205, doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2023.01.02110.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000‑7210.2023.01.021
     https://doi.org/10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2023.01.021 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang, W., Huang, J., Feng, W., Wang, L., Shang, H. and Yin, Y.2022. Reservoir architecture in tide-dominated estuary: a case study of McMurray Formation Oil Sand Reservoir in the Athabasca Block, Canada. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 894059, doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.89405910.3389/feart.2022.894059
     https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.894059 [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhu, Y., Zheng, J. et al.2023. Facies, depositional environment and reservoir quality of an early Cambrian carbonate ramp in the Tarim Basin, NW China. Minerals, 13, 791, doi: 10.3390/min1306079110.3390/min13060791
     https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060791 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2025-015
Loading
Seismic prediction workflow based on architecture analysis for carbonate ramp shoal reservoirs: a case study on the Upper Cretaceous Hartha Formation of the M Oilfield, Mesopotamia Basin
Petroleum Geoscience 31, petgeo2025-015 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2025-015
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2025-015
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2025-015
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error