1887
Volume 32, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The organic-rich shale facies of the Lower Jurassic Datta Formation in the Upper Indus Basin in Pakistan was studied using geological and geochemical investigations to assess the unconventional shale oil reservoir potential. The Datta shale facies is a promising oil-prone stratum, consisting of total organic carbon (TOC) exceeding 2 wt%, and primarily comprising Type II and II/III kerogens, with a hydrogen index (HI) exceeding 250 mgHC g TOC. The Datta shale facies is also characterized by higher free hydrocarbon (S) content than TOC, resulting in a high oil saturation index (OSI) between 30.81 and 298.7 mgHC g TOC, wherein the high OSI of more than 100 mgHC g TOC indicates a strong potential for oil production. This finding is consistent with the current thermally mature oil window, which ranges between early mature and peak mature, as supported by vitrinite reflectance (%VR) values of up to 0.82. This main oil-generation window leads to the conversion of extensive hydrogen-rich kerogen for commercial oil generation, with a transformation ratio (TR) of up to 65%, as demonstrated by 1D basin modelling. Maximum oil generation, with TR values exceeding 50%, leads to high pressure and results in microfracture pores in the Datta shale facies. The presence of non-fabric-fracture pores is confirmed by high-resolution petrographical scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Consequently, these findings highlight that the Datta shale facies should be considered for use as an unconventional shale oil reservoir, with the suggestion of hydraulic fracturing techniques for production purposes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2025-057
2026-02-27
2026-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbasi, I.A., Haneef, M., Obaid, S., Daud, F. and Qureshi, A.W.2012. Mesozoic deltaic system along the western margin of the Indian plate: lithofacies and depositional setting of Datta Formation, North Pakistan. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 5, 471–480, doi: 10.1007/s12517-010-0276-110.1007/s12517‑010‑0276‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0276-1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed, A., Jahandad, S., Hakimi, M.H., Gharib, A.F., Mehmood, S., Kahal, A.Y. and Lashin, A.2022. Organic matter characteristics and conventional oil potentials of shales from the Early Jurassic Datta Formation in the Upper Indus Basin, Northern Pakistan. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 224, doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.10497510.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104975
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104975 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed, A., Hakimi, M.H. et al.2025. Geochemical characteristics and 1-D basin modelling study of the Early Cretaceous and Paleogene succession in the southern Indus Basin, southern Pakistan. Geological Journal.60, 2213–2231, doi: 10.1002/gj.516910.1002/gj.5169
    https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.5169 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexander, T., Baihly, J. et al.2011. Shale gas revolution. Oilfield Review, 23, 40–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ali, F., Zhang, S., Abbas, S., Hanif, M., Zhang, Y. and Mohibullah, M.2022. Discovery of the Lower–Middle Jurassic high potential source rocks based on the geochemical investigation from the Indus Basin, Pakistan. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 208, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.10937410.1016/j.petrol.2021.109374
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109374 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ali, F., Shiqi, Z., Ahmed, R., Ali, B. and Iqbal, H.2023. Palynostratograhical and oceanic anoxic event investigation in the Lower Jurassic Black shale, Indus Basin, Pakistan. Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences, 56, 73–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Asquith, G. and Krygowski, D.2004. Basic Well Log Analysis. 2nd edn. AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, 16.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Asrarullah, P.1967. Geology of the Khewra dome. In: Proceedings of the 18th and 19th combined session of All Pakistan Science Conference, University of Sind, Hyderabad, Part–III. Pakistan Association for the Advancement of Science, Lahore, Pakistan, F3–F4.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bish, D. and Post, J.1989. Modern Powder Diffraction. Mineralogical Society of America Reviews in Mineralogy, 20.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Botor, D. and Bábek, O.2019. Burial and thermal history modelling of the Upper Carboniferous strata based on vitrinite reflectance data from Bzie-Dębina-60 borehole (Upper Silesian Coal Basin, southern Poland). Geologické výzkumy na Moravě a ve Slezsku, 26, 73–79, doi: 10.5817/GVMS2019-1-2-7310.5817/GVMS2019‑1‑2‑73
    https://doi.org/10.5817/GVMS2019-1-2-73 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bryndzia, L.T. and Braunsdorf, N.R.2014. From source rock to reservoir: the evolution of self-sourced unconventional resource plays. Elements, 10, 271–276, doi: 10.2113/gselements.10.4.27110.2113/gselements.10.4.271
    https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.10.4.271 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chaudhry, M.N. and Ahsan, N.1999. Reservoir potential of Datta Formation, Hazara Basin, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Hydrocarbon Research, 11, 15–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Coward, M.P., Rex, D.C., Asif Khan, M., Windley, B.F., Broughton, R.D., Luff, I.W. and Pudsey, C.J.1986. Collision tectonics in the NW Himalayas. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 19, 203–219, doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1986.019.01.1110.1144/GSL.SP.1986.019.01.11
    https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1986.019.01.11 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ding, W., Li, C., Li, C., Xu, C., Jiu, K. and Zeng, W.2012. Fracture development in shale and its relationship to gas accumulation. Geoscience Frontiers, 3, 97–105, doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2011.10.00110.1016/j.gsf.2011.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Di Pietro, J.A. and Pogue, K.R.2004. Tectonostratigraphic subdivisions of the Himalaya: A view from the west. Tectonics, 23, TC5001, doi: 10.1029/2003TC00155410.1029/2003TC001554
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2003TC001554 [Google Scholar]
  16. Espitalié, J., Madec, M., Tissot, B., Mennig, J.J. and Leplat, P.1977. Source rock characterization method for petroleum exploration. Paper OTC-2935-MS presented at theOffshore Technology Conference, May 1–4, 1977, Houston, Texas, USA, doi: 10.4043/2935-MS10.4043/2935‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.4043/2935-MS [Google Scholar]
  17. Espitalié, J., Deroo, G. and Marquis, F.1985. La pyrolyse Rock-Eval et ses applications and developments. Oil & Gas Science and Technology Revue Institute French Petroleum Energy Nouvelles, 40, 563–580.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fazeelat, T., Jalees, M.I. and Bianchi, T.S.2010. Source rock potential of Eocene, Paleocene and Jurassic deposits in the subsurface of the Potwar Basin, northern Pakistan. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 33, 87–96, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-5457.2010.00465.x10.1111/j.1747‑5457.2010.00465.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2010.00465.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Ghani, H., Zeilinger, G., Sobel, E.R. and Heidarzadeh, G.2018. Structural variation within the Himalayan fold and thrust belt: A case study from the Kohat–Potwar Fold Thrust Belt of Pakistan. Journal of Structural Geology, 116, 34–46, doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.02210.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.022 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hadad, Y.T., Hakimi, M.H., Abdullah, W.H. and Makeen, Y.M.2017. Basin modeling of the late Miocene Zeit source rock in the Sudanese portion of red sea basin: Implication for hydrocarbon generation and expulsion history. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 84, 311–322, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.04.00210.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hadded, A., Layeb, M., Mannai-Tayech, B., Milad, B., Saïdi, M. and Soussi, M.2021. Subsurface geochemical and mineralogical evaluation for unconventional ‘shale’ oil play of the Bahloul Formation (Cenomanian–Turonian) in the Sahel Basin, Eastern Tunisia. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14, 1–30, doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-07977-510.1007/s12517‑021‑07977‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07977-5 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hakimi, M.H., Abdullah, W.H. and Shalaby, M.R.2010. Organic geochemistry, burial history and hydrocarbon generation modeling of the upper Jurassic Madbi formation, Masila basin Yemen. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 33, 299–318, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-5457.2010.00481.x10.1111/j.1747‑5457.2010.00481.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2010.00481.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Hakimi, M.H., Hamed, T.E., Lotfy, N.M., Radwan, A.E., Lashin, A. and Afikah Rahim, A.2024. Hydraulic fracturing as unconventional production potential for the organic-rich carbonate reservoir rocks in the Abu El Gharadig Field, north western Desert (Egypt): Evidence from combined organic geochemical, petrophysical and bulk kinetics modeling results. Fuel, 334, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12660610.1016/j.fuel.2022.126606
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126606 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hazra, B., Katz, B.J., Singh, D.P. and Singh, P.K.2022. Impact of siderite on Rock-Eval S3 and oxygen index. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 143, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.10580410.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105804
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105804 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hu, T., Pang, X. et al.2018. Geochemical and geological characteristics of Permian Lucaogou Formation shale of the well Ji174, Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin, China: implications for shale oil exploration. Geological Journal, 53, 2371–2385, doi: 10.1002/gj.307310.1002/gj.3073
    https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3073 [Google Scholar]
  26. Iqbal, M.W.A. and Shah, S.M.I.1980. A Guide to the Stratigraphy of Pakistan. Geological Survey of Pakistan Record53.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jamil, A., Waheed, A. and Sheikh, R.A.2012. Pakistan's major petroleum plays – an overview of dwindling reserves. Search and Discovery article 10399, PAPG/SPE Annual Technical Conference 2009, November 17–18, 2009, Islamabad, Pakistan, https://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2012/10399jamil/ndx_jamil.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jarvie, D.M.2012. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: Part 2 – shale-oil resource systems. AAPG Memoirs, 97, 89–119, doi: 10.1306/13321447M97348910.1306/13321447M973489
    https://doi.org/10.1306/13321447M973489
  29. Jarvie, D.M. and Lundell, L.L.2001. Amount, type, and kinetics of thermal transformation of organic matter in the Miocene Monterey Formation. In: Isaacs, C.M. and Rullkötter, J. (eds) The Monterey Formation: From Rocks to Molecules. Columbia University Press, New York, 268–295.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jarvie, D.M., Hill, R.J., Ruble, T.E. and Pollastro, R.M.2007. Unconventional shale-gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. AAPG Bulletin, 91, 475–499, doi: 10.1306/1219060606810.1306/12190606068
    https://doi.org/10.1306/12190606068 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kadri, I.B.1995. Petroleum Geology of Pakistan. Pakistan Petroleum Ltd, Karachi, Pakistan.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Katz, B. and Lin, F.2014. Lacustrine basin unconventional resource plays: Key differences. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 56, 255–265, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.02.01310.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.02.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.02.013 [Google Scholar]
  33. Katz, B.J. and Lin, F.2021. Consideration of the limitations of thermal maturity with respect to vitrinite reflectance, Tmax, and other proxies. AAPG Bulletin, 105, 695–720, doi: 10.1306/0924201926110.1306/09242019261
    https://doi.org/10.1306/09242019261 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kazmi, A.H. and Abbasi, I.A.2008. Stratigraphy and Historical Geology of Pakistan. Department & NCE in Geology, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kemal, A.1992. Geology and new trends for hydrocarbon exploration in Pakistan. In: Ahmed, G., Kemal, A., Zaman, A.S.H. and Humayon, M. (eds) New Directions and Strategies for Accelerating Petroleum Exploration and Production in Pakistan: Proceedings of the International Petroleum Seminar. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad, 16–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Morris, R.L. and Biggs, W.P.1967. Using log-derived values of water saturation and porosity. Paper SPWLA-1967-X presented at theSPWLA 8th Annual Logging Symposium, June 12–14, 1967, Denver, Colorado, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mukhopadhyay, P.K.1994. Vitrinite reflectance as maturity parameter: Petrographic and molecular characterization and its applications to basin modeling. ACS Symposium Series, 570, 1–24, doi: 10.1021/bk-1994-0570.ch00110.1021/bk‑1994‑0570.ch001
    https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1994-0570.ch001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nielsen, B.L., Løvborg, L., Sørensen, P. and Mose, E.1987. Gamma-Ray Analysis for U, Th, and K on Bulk Cutting Samples from Deep Wells in the Danish Subbasin and the North German Basin. Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Obaid, S., Qureshi, A.W. and Abbasi, I.A.2005. Lithofacies, sand-bodies geometry and depositional setting of the Datta Formation in Surghar Range, North Pakistan. Paper SPE-111038-MS presented at theSPE/PAPG Annual Technical Conference, November 28–29, 2005, Islamabad, Pakistan, doi: 10.2118/111038-MS10.2118/111038‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/111038-MS [Google Scholar]
  40. OGDC1995. Pakistan Petroleum Prospects – An Overview. Oil and Gas Development Corporation (OGDC), Islamabad.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Peters, K.E.1986. Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source rock using programmed pyrolysis. AAPG Bulletin, 70, 318–329.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Qasim, M., Lin Ding, L. et al.2018. Tectonic implications of detrital zircon ages from Lesser Himalayan Mesozoic–Cenozoic strata, Pakistan. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 19, 1636–1659, doi: 10.1002/2017GC00689510.1002/2017GC006895
    https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GC006895 [Google Scholar]
  43. Quadri, V.N. and Quadri, S.M.G.J.1996. Anatomy of success in oil and gas exploration in Pakistan, 1915–94. Oil & Gas Journal, 94, May 13, https://www.ogj.com/home/article/17234725/exploration-anatomy-of-success-in-oil-and-gas-exploration-in-pakistan-1915-94
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Raza, H.A.1992. Petroleum source rocks in Pakistan. In: Gulfaraz, A., Kemal, A., Zaman, A.S.H., Humayon, M. (eds) New Directions and Strategies for Accelerating Petroleum Exploration in Pakistan: Islamabad, Pakistan, Proceedings of an International Petroleum Seminar. Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rider, M.1996. The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs. 2nd edn. Rider French Consulting, Aberdeen, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Saeed, S.A., Hakimi, M.H. et al.2023. Geochemical, mineralogical and petrographical characteristics of the Domanik Formation from north Samara region in the Volga–Ural basin, Russia: Implication for unconventional tight oil reservoir potential. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 220A, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.11124010.1016/j.petrol.2022.111240
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111240 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schlumberger1972. The Essentials of Log Interpretation Practice. Schlumberger Ltd, Paris, 45–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Shah, S.M.I.2009. Stratigraphy of Pakistan. Geological Survey of Pakistan Memoirs, 22.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Shalaby, M.R., Hakimi, M.H. and Abdullah, W.H.2012. Geochemical characterization of solid bitumen (migrabitumen) in the Jurassic sandstone reservoir of the Tut Field, Shushan Basin, northern Western Desert of Egypt. International Journal of Coal Geology, 100, 26–39, doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2012.06.00110.1016/j.coal.2012.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2012.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Siddiqui, N.K.2016. Petroleum Geology, Basin Architecture and Stratigraphy of Pakistan. Fazlees Book Supermarket, Karachi, Pakistan.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Snyder, R.L. and Bish, D.L.1989. Quantitative analysis. Mineralogical Society of America Reviews in Mineralogy, 20, 101–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sohail, G.M., Radwan, A.E. and Mahmoud, M.2022. A review of Pakistani shales for shale gas exploration and comparison to North American shale plays. Energy Reports, 8, 6423–6442, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.04.07410.1016/j.egyr.2022.04.074
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.04.074 [Google Scholar]
  53. Speight, J.G.2012. Shale Oil Production Processes. Elsevier, Amsterdam, doi: 10.1016/C2012-0-00597-210.1016/C2012‑0‑00597‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-00597-2 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sweeney, J.J. and Burnham, A.K.1990. Evaluation of a simple model of vitrinite reflectance based on chemical kinetics. AAPG Bulletin, 74, 1559–1570, doi: 10.1306/0C9B251F-1710-11D7-8645000102C1865D10.1306/0C9B251F‑1710‑11D7‑8645000102C1865D
    https://doi.org/10.1306/0C9B251F-1710-11D7-8645000102C1865D [Google Scholar]
  55. Taylor, G.H., Teichmüller, M., Davis, A., Diessel, C.F.K., Littke, R. and Robert, P.1998. Organic Petrology. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wandrey, C.J., Law, B.E. and Shah, H.A.2004. Sembar Goru/Ghazij Composite Total Petroleum System, Indus and Sulaiman-Kirthar Geologic Provinces, Pakistan and India. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, E.Z., Feng, Y., Guo, T.L. and Li, M.W.2022. Oil content and resource quality evaluation methods for lacustrine shale: A review and a novel three-dimensional quality evaluation model. Earth-Science Reviews, 232, doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.10413410.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104134
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104134 [Google Scholar]
  58. Waples, D.W.1980. Time and temperature in petroleum formation: Application of Lopatin's method to petroleum exploration. AAPG Bulletin, 64, 916–926, doi: 10.1306/2F9193D2-16CE-11D7-8645000102C1865D10.1306/2F9193D2‑16CE‑11D7‑8645000102C1865D
    https://doi.org/10.1306/2F9193D2-16CE-11D7-8645000102C1865D [Google Scholar]
  59. Wright, M.C., Court, R.W., Kafantaris, F.C.A., Spathopoulos, F. and Sephton, M.A.2015. A new rapid method for shale oil and shale gas assessment. Fuel, 153, 231–239, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.08910.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.089
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.089 [Google Scholar]
  60. Xu, H., Zhou, W. et al.2021. Quartz types, silica sources and their implications for porosity evolution and rock mechanics in the Paleozoic Longmaxi Formation shale, Sichuan Basin. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 128, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.10503610.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105036
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105036 [Google Scholar]
  61. Yang, S. and Horsfield, B.2020. Critical review of the uncertainty of Tmax in revealing the thermal maturity of organic matter in sedimentary rocks. International Journal of Coal Geology, 225, doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2020.10350010.1016/j.coal.2020.103500
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2020.103500 [Google Scholar]
  62. Zaidi, S.N.A., Brohi, I.A., Ramzan, K., Ahmed, N., Mehmood, F. and Brohi, A.U.2013. Distribution and hydrocarbon potential of Datta sands in Upper Indus Basin, Pakistan. Sindh University Research Journal (Science Series), 45, 325–332, https://sujo.usindh.edu.pk/index.php/SURJ/article/view/5553/3768
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Zaigham, N.A. and Mallick, K.A.2000. Prospect of hydrocarbon associated with fossil-rift structures of the southern Indus basin, Pakistan. AAPG Bulletin, 84, 1833–1848, doi: 10.1306/8626C3A7-173B-11D7-8645000102C1865D10.1306/8626C3A7‑173B‑11D7‑8645000102C1865D
    https://doi.org/10.1306/8626C3A7-173B-11D7-8645000102C1865D [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang, H., Shi, J.-T. and Li, X.-F.2018. Optimization of shale gas reservoir evaluation and assessment of shale gas resources in the Oriente Basin in Ecuador. Petroleum Science, 15, 756–771, doi: 10.1007/s12182-018-0273-710.1007/s12182‑018‑0273‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-018-0273-7 [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhu, B., Kidd, W.S., Rowley, D.B., Currie, B.S. and Shafique, N.2005. Age of initiation of the India–Asia collision in the east-central Himalaya. The Journal of Geology, 113, 265–285, doi: 10.1086/42880510.1086/428805
    https://doi.org/10.1086/428805 [Google Scholar]
  66. Zou, C., Zhang, G. et al.2013. Concepts, characteristics, potential and technology of unconventional hydrocarbon: On unconventional petroleum geology. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 40, 413–428, doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(13)60053-110.1016/S1876‑3804(13)60053‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(13)60053-1 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2025-057
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2025-057
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error