1887
Volume 37, Issue 7
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
PDF

Abstract

Summary

In this paper, we investigate source ghost generation using experimental data acquired using a dual-string air-gun array instrumented with two near-field hydrophone (NFH) channels per source element instead of the usual single NFH per source element. The extra NFHs enable us to solve directly for source ghosts, sidestepping the requirement for a ghost model. Experience has shown that the standard ghost model does not always represent well the physics of ghost generation for an air-gun array. In practice this model is typically parameterized via a frequency-dependent effective reflectivity, the magnitude of which often needs to be reduced more than expected for the effects of rough sea-surface scattering. The NFH recordings in this test are compared with synthetic data to highlight problems with the standard model of ghost generation and the results suggest that acoustically induced cavitation is responsible for the observed reduction in the amplitude of the ghost. We show examples of de-signature on seismic data using operators derived with and without a ghost model and discuss the merits and potential issues going forward.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019020
2019-07-01
2020-01-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eage/37/7/Telling_TA_FB_July_2019.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019020&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Cole, R.H.
    [1948]. Underwater Explosions.Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hampson, G.
    [2017]. Notional ghosts. 86th Annual SEG Meeting, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hargreaves, N., Grion, S. and Telling, R.
    [2015]. Estimation of air-gun array signatures from near-gun measurements - least-squares inversion, bubble motion and error analysis. 85th SEG Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 149–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hargreaves, N., Telling, R., Grion, S.
    [2016]. Source deghosting and directional designature using near-field derived airgun signatures. 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jovanovich, D.B., Sumner, R.D. and Atkins-Easterlin, S.L.
    [1983]. Ghosting and marine signature deconvolution. Geophysics, 48 (11), 1468–1485.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Khodabandeloo, B. and Landrø, M.
    [2018]. Acoustically induced cavity cloud generated by air-gun arrays – comparing video recordings and acoustic data to modeling. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 143 (6), 3383–3393.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kragh, E. and Combee, L.
    [2000] Using a seismic reflector for resolving streamer depth and sea surface profiles. First Break, 18, 463–467.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kryvohuz, M. and Campman, X.
    [2017]. Source-side up-down wavefield separation using dual NFHs. 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Landrø, M., Amundsen, L. and Barker, D.
    [2011] High-frequency signals from air-gun arrays. Geophysics, 76, Q19–Q27.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Landrø, M., Ni, Y. and Amundsen, L.
    [2016]. Reducing high-frequency ghost cavitation signals from marine air-gun arrays. Geophysics, 81, P33–P46
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Landrø, M. and Sollie, R.
    [1992]. Source signature determination by inversion. Geophysics, 57, 1633–1640
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Medwin, H. and Clay, C.S.
    [1998]. Fundamentals of Acoustical Oceanography.Academic Press, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ni, Y., Niang, C. and Siliqi, R.
    [2012]. Monitoring the stability of airgun source array signature. 82nd Annual SEG Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1g–5
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Parkes, G.E., Ziolkowski, A., Hatton, L. and Haugland, T.
    [1984]. The signature of an airgun array: computation from near-field measurements including interactions — Practical considerations. Geophysics, 49, 105–111
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Parkes, G. and Hatton, L.
    [1986] The Marine Seismic Souce.D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Telling, R., Light, R., Grion, S., Denny, S. and Williams, R.G.
    [2018a] Signature estimation and drop-out implications for a triple source marine seismic survey, 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Telling, R., Grion, S., Denny, S. and Williams, R.G.
    [2018b] Source ghost generation: observations from a dual near-field hydrophone test, EAGE Marine Acquisition Workshop, Oslo.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ziolkowski, A., Parkes, G., Hatton, L. and Haugland, T.
    [1982]. The signature of an air gun array: Computation from near-field measurements including interactions. Geophysics, 47 (10), 1413–1421.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019020
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019020
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error