1887
Volume 37, Issue 11
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Marine Controlled Source ElectroMagnetic (CSEM) measurements, which determine sub-surface resistivity, have become increasingly successful, and especially in the Barents Sea the method is a key driver in exploration activity. Electrical resistivity data can be acquired in a number of different ways. Traditional measurement of resistivity through well logging has now been complemented by measurements made from the seafloor using a number of different methods, each with unique features and benefits that make CSEM more applicable as part of hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation de-risking and reservoir management.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019034
2019-11-01
2020-01-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eage/37/11/MacGregor_ST_FB_Nov_2019.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019034&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alcocer, J.A.E, Garcia, M.V., Soto, H.S., Baltar, D., Paramo, V.R., Gabri-elson, P. and Roth, F.
    [2013]. Reducing uncertainty by integrating 3D CSEM in the Mexican deepwater workflow.First Break, 31, 75–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarez, P., Marcy, F., Vrijlandt, M., Skinnemoen, O., MacGregor, L., Nichols, K., Keirstead, R., Bolivar, F., Bouchrara, S., Smith, M., Tseng, H-W and Rappke, J.
    [2018]. Multi-physics characterisation of reservoir prospects in the Hoop area of the Barents Sea.Interpretation, 6 (3), 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvarez, P. , Alvarez, A., MacGregor, L., Bolivar, F., Keirstead, R. and Martin, T.
    [2017]. Reservoir property prediction using CSEM, pre-stack seismic and well log data: Case study in the Hoop Area, Barents Sea, Norway.Interpretation, 5, SE43–SE60.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Andreis, D., MacGregor, L., Grana, D., Alvarez, P. and Ellis, M.
    [2018]. Overcoming scale incompatibility in petrophysical joint inversion of surface seismic and CSEM data.SEG Annual meeting, Expanded Abstract.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chave, D. and Cox, C.
    [1982]. Controlled electromagnetic sources for measuring electrical conductivity beneath the oceans, 1, forward problem and model study.J. geophys. Res., 87, 5327–5338.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, J. and Hoversten, G.M.
    [2012]. Joint inversion of marine seismic AVA and CSEM data using statistical rock physics and Markov random fields.Geophysics, 77, R65–R80.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Constable, S. and Cox, C.S.
    [1996]. Marine controlled source electromagnetic sounding II: The PEGASUS experiment.J. Geophys. Res., 101, 5519–5530.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Constable, S. and Srnka, L.
    [2007]. An introduction to marine controlled source electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration.Geophysics, 72, WA3–WA12.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Constable, S.
    [2010]. Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration.Geophysics, 75, A67–A81.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. [2013]. Review paper: Instrumentation for marine magne-totelluric and controlled source EM sounding.Geophysical Prospecting, 61, 505–532.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cuevas, N.H. and Alumbaugh, D.
    [2011]. Near source response of a resistive layer to a horizontal or vertical electric dipole excitation.Geophysics, 76, F353–F371.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Du, Z. and MacGregor, L.
    [2009]. Reservoir parameter estimation from joint inversion of marine CSEM and seismic AVO data using genetic algorithms.EAGE annual meeting, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Du., Z., Namo, G., May, J. and Reiser, C.
    [2017]. Total hydrocarbon volume in place; improved reservoir characterization from integration of towed-streamer EM and dual-sensor broadband seismic data.First Break, 35, 89–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Edwards, R.N.
    [2005]. Marine Controlled Source Electromagnetics: Principles, methodologies and future commercial applications.Surveys in Geophysics, 26, 675–700.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellingsrud, S., Eidesmo, T., Johansen, S., Sinha, M.C., MacGregor, L.M. and Constable, S.
    [2002]. Remote sensing of hydrocarbon layers using sea-bed logging (SBL): Results of a cruise offshore West Africa.The Leading Edge, 21, 972–982.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, M., Ruiz, F., Nanduri, S., Keirstead, R., Azizov, I., Frenkel, M. and MacGregor, L.
    [2011]. Importance of anisotropic rock physics modelling in integrated seismic and CSEM interpretation.First Break, 29, 87–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Englemark, F., Mattsson, J., McKay, A. and Du, Z.
    [2014]. Towed streamer EM comes of age.First Break, 32, 75–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. FliednerM. and Treitel, S.
    [2011]. Stochastic inversion of CSEM and seismic data using the Neighbourhood Algorithm.EAGE annual meeting, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gabrielsen, P., Abrahamson, P., Panzer, M., Fanavoll, S. and Ellingsrud, S.
    [2013]. Exploring frontier areas using 2D seismic and 3D CSEM data, as exemplified by multi-client data over the Skrugard and Havis discoveries in the Barents Sea.First Break, 31, 63–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Helwig, S., El Kaffas, A., Holten, T., Frafjord, O. and Eide, K.
    [2013]. Vertical dipole CSEM: technology advances and results from the Snøhvit field.First Break, 31, 63–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Helwig, S. L., Kaffas, A., Holten, T., Frafjord, O. and Eide, K.
    [2014]. Four Case Studies for Vertical Time Domain CSEM from the Norwegian Continental Shelf.SEG Annual Meeting, 755–759.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Helwig, S., Myer, D., Key, K., El Kaffas, A.W., Wu, X., Eide, K and Frafjord, O.
    [2018]. A comparison between time domain and frequency domain inversion of vertical vertical CSEM data.EAGE annual meeting, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Holten, T., Flekkøy, E. G., Singer, B., Blixt, E. M., Hanssen, A. and Måløy, K. J.
    [2009]. Verical source, vertical receiver, electromagnetic technique for offshore hydrocarbon exploration.First Break, 27 (5), 89–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoversten, G., Cassassuce, F., Gasperikova, E., Newman, G., Chen, J., Rubin, Y., Hou, Z. and Vasco, D.
    [2006]. Direct reservoir parameter estimation using joint inversion of marine seismic AVA and CSEM data.Geophysics, 71, C1–C13.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MacGregor, L.M. and Sinha, M.C.
    [2000]. Use of marine controlled source electromagnetic sounding for sub-basalt exploration.Geophysical Prospecting, 48, 1091–1106.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MacGregor, L.M.
    [2012]. Integrating seismic, CSEM and well log data for reservoir characterisation.The Leading Edge, 31 (3), 268–277.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MacGregor, L. and Tomlinson, J.
    [2014]. Marine controlled-source electromagnetic methods in the hydrocarbon industry: A tutorial on method and practice.Interpretation, 2, SH13–SH32.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mattsson, J., Englemark, F. and Anderson, C.
    [2013]. Towed streamer EM; the challenges of sensitivity and anisotropy.First Break, 31, 155–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McKay, A., Mattsson, J. and Du., Z.
    [2015]. Towed streamer EM: reliable recovery of sub-surface resistivity.First Break, 33, 75–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Miotti, F., Zerilli, A., Menezes, P., Crepaldi, J. and Viana, A.
    [2018]. A New Petrophysical Joint Inversion Workflow. Advancing on Reservoir’s Characterization Challenges.Interpretation, 6, SG33–SG39.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Young, P.D. and Cox, C.S.
    [1981]. Electromagnetic active source sounding near the East Pacific Rise.Geophys. Res. Letts., 8, 1043–1046.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhdanov, M., Endo, M., Yoon, D., Cuma, M., Mattson, J. and Midgely, J.
    [2017]. Anisotropic 3D inversion of towed-streamer electromagnetic data: Case study from the Troll West Oil Province.Interpretation, 2, SH97–SH113.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019034
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019034
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error