Processing and imaging of towed-streamer electromagnetic data with synthetic aperture method

References

1. Constable, S., and L.J.Srnka
   [2007]. An introduction to marine con-trolled-source electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration.Geophysics, 72, (2), WA3–WA12, doi: 10.1190/1.2432483.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2432483 [Google Scholar]
2. Constable, S., P.K.Kannberg, and K.Weitemeyer
   [2016]. Vulcan: A deep-towed CSEM receiver.Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 17 (3), 1042–1064, doi: 10.1002/2015GC006174.
   https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC006174 [Google Scholar]
3. Du, Z.
   [2015]. Towed Streamer EM data density and target recoverability.SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015, edited, 894–898.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Fan, Y., R.Snieder, E.Slob, J.Hunziker, J.Singer, J.Sheiman, and M.Rosen-quist
   [2010]. Synthetic aperture controlled source electromagnetics.Geophysical Research Letters, 37, (13), doi: doi:10.1029/2010GL043981.
   https://doi.org/doi:10.1029/2010GL043981 [Google Scholar]
5. Fan, Y., R.Snieder, E.Slob, J.Hunziker, J.Singer, J.Sheiman, and M.Rosenquist
   [2012]. Increasing the sensitivity of controlled-source electromagnetics with synthetic aperture.Geophysics, 77, (2), E135–E145, doi: 10.1190/geo2011‑0102.1.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0102.1 [Google Scholar]
6. Gao, G., A.Abubakar, and T.M.Habashy
   [2012]. Joint petrophysical inversion of electromagnetic and full-waveform seismic data.Geophysics, 77, (3), WA3–WA18, doi: 10.1190/geo2011‑0157.1.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0157.1 [Google Scholar]
7. Guitton, A. and W.W.Symes
   [2003]. Robust inversion of seismic data using the Huber norm.Geophysics, 68, (4), 1310–1319.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Knaak, A., R.Snieder, Y.Fan, and D.Ramirez-Mejia
   [2013]. 3D synthetic aperture and steering for controlled-source electromagnetics.The Leading Edge, 32, (8), 972–978, doi: 10.1190/tle32080972.1.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/tle32080972.1 [Google Scholar]
9. MacGregor, L., and J.Tomlinson
   [2014]. Marine controlled-source electromagnetic methods in the hydrocarbon industry: A tutorial on method and practice.Interpretation, 2, (3), SH13–SH32, doi: 10.1190/int‑2013‑0163.1.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2013-0163.1 [Google Scholar]
10. MacGregor, L., N.Barker, A.Overton, S.Moody, and D.Bodecott
    [2007]. Derisking exploration prospects using integrated seismic and electromagnetic data - a Falkland Islands case study.The Leading Edge, 26, (3), 356–359, doi: 10.1190/1.2715059.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2715059 [Google Scholar]
11. Mattsson, J., and F.Engelmark
    [2013]. Optimized synthetic aperture sensitivity enhancement of a deep EM marine target.75th Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
12. McKay, A., J.Mattsson, and Z.Du
    [2015]. Towed Streamer EM – reliable recovery of sub-surface resistivity.First Break, 33, (4), 12.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Tarantola, A.
    [2005]. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Yoon, D., and M.S.Zhdanov
    [2015]. Optimal Synthetic Aperture Method for Marine Controlled-Source EM Surveys.IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12, (2), 414–418, doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2345416.
    https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2014.2345416 [Google Scholar]
15. Zhdanov, M.S.
    [2015]. Inverse Theory and Applications in Geophysics. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Zhdanov, M.S.
    [2018]. Foundations of Geophysical Electromagnetic Theory and Methods (Second Edition). Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Zhdanov, M.S., D.Yoon, and J.Mattsson
    [2017]. Rapid Imaging of Towed Streamer EM Data Using the Optimal Synthetic Aperture Method. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14, (2), 262–266, doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2637919.
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ LGRS.2016.2637919 [Google Scholar]
18. Zhdanov, M.S., M.Endo, D.Yoon, M.Čuma, J.Mattsson, and J.Midgley
    [2014a]. Anisotropic 3D inversion of towed-streamer electromagnetic data. Case study from the Troll West Oil Province: Interpretation, 2, (3), SH97–SH113, doi: 10.1190/int‑2013‑0156.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2013-0156.1 [Google Scholar]
19. Zhdanov, M.S., M.Endo, L.H.Cox, M.Čuma, J.Linfoot, C.Anderson, N.Black, and A. V.Gribenko
    [2014b]. Three-dimensional inversion of towed streamer electromagnetic data. Geophysical Prospecting, 62, (3), 552–572, doi: 10.1111/1365‑2478.12097.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12097 [Google Scholar]