Volume 37, Issue 12
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397



Our primary investigative tool for understanding the subsurface prospectivity is seismic data, where energy reflected from different seismic horizons can reveal the physical properties of these rocks. The deeper in the earth we look, the weaker the reflected signal will be, so finding ways to boost this signal, without affecting its properties is critical to being able to analyse this signal. Furthermore, seismic interpretation requires a quantitative understanding of the seismic data and it is common practice to assume that the seismic amplitudes can be understood in terms of either acoustic or elastic wave propagation. Preparing ‘interpretation-ready’ seismic data therefore faces two possibly conflicting challenges. On the one hand, seismic processing should conserve the amplitude fidelity of the seismic data. On the other hand, compensation of viscous effects such as attenuation and dispersion facilitates data analysis.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Avseth, P., Dræge, A., van Wijngaarden, A., Johansen, T. and Jørstad, A.
    [2008]. Shale rock physics and implications for AVO analysis: A North Sea demonstration.The Leading Edge, 27, 788–797.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bohlen, T.
    [2002]. Parallel 3-D viscoelastic finite difference seismic modelling.Computers & Geosciences, 28, 887–899.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohlen, T. and Wittkamp, F.
    [2016]. Three-dimensional viscoelastic time-domain finite-difference seismic modelling using the staggered Adams–Bashforth time integrator.Geophysical Journal International, 204, 1781–1788.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hardwick, A.J., Woods, D., Masoomzadeh, H. and Clark, R.
    [2017]. Improved Q Estimation and Application in the Time Domain with Broadband Seismic Data from the North Sea.79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We A2 09.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Intawong, A., Hodgson, N. and Rodriguez, K.
    [2019]. Basin Architecture and Hydrocarbon Play Concepts in the Turkish Eastern Black Sea.AAPG GTW: Exploration and Production in the Black Sea, Caucasus, and Caspian Region, Abstract Volume.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Langhammer, J., Bondeson, H., Kjølhamar, B., Baldock, S., Masoomza-deh, H. and Ratnett, N.
    [2018]. Triple Source in Seismic Exploration - Experiences Offshore Norway.80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Tu E 03.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lazaratos, S. and Finn, C.
    [2004]. Deterministic spectral balancing for high-fidelity AVO, 74th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 219–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ratnett, N., Baldock, S. and Masoomzadeh, H.
    [2019]. A Method for Applying Amplitude Inverse Q that Preserves Amplitude Variations with Offset.81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We R01 13.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. [2019]. A practical data-driven method for applying amplitude inverse Q that preserves amplitude variations with offset, 89th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 620–624.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Seher, T., Kokoshina, E. and Spoors, S.
    [2019]. Amplitude friendly inverse Q filtering, 89th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 625–629.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Trantham, E., and He, K.
    [2017]. AVA friendly Q amplitude compensation, 87th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 643–645.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Y.
    [2009]. Seismic Inverse Q Filtering. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error