Volume 38 Number 2
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
Preview this article:
Zoom in

4D seismic study of the Volve Field - an open subsurface-dataset, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/fb/38/2/fb2020011-1.gif

There is no abstract available for this article.
Use the preview function to the left.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alvarez, E.
    [2014]. Petroelastic Approximations for Quantitative 4D Seismic interpretation.Heriot-Watt University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Amini, H.
    [2014]. A Pragmatic Approach to Simulation-to-Seismic Modelling for 4D Seismic Interpretation.Heriot-Watt University.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Batzle, M. and Wang, Z.
    [1992]. Seismic properties of pore fluids.Geophysics, 57(11), 1396–1408.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Folkestad, A. and Satur, N.
    [2008]. Regressive and transgressive cycles in a rift-basin: Depositional model and sedimentary partitioning of the Middle Jurassic Hugin Formation, Southern Viking Graben, North Sea.Sedimentary Geology,207(1–4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2008.03.006.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hansen, N. and Ostermeier, A.
    [2001]. Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies.Evolutionary Computation,9(2), 159–195. https://doi.org/10.1162/106365601750190398.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnston, D.H.
    [2013]. Practical Applications of Time-lapse Seismic Data.https://doi.org/10.1190/E9781560803126.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kieft, R.L., Jackson, C.A.-L., Hampson, G.J. and Larsen, E.
    [2011]. Sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy of the Hugin Formation, Quadrant 15, Norwegian sector, South Viking Graben.Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series,7(1), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1144/0070157.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lunde, B.
    [2013]. Diagenesis and Reservoir Quality of the Hugin Formation Sandstones in the North Sea.Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MacBeth, C.
    [2004]. A classification for the pressure-sensitivity properties of a sandstone rock frame.Geophysics,69(2), 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1707070.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MacBeth, C., Mangriotis, M.D. and Amini, H.
    [2019]. Review Paper: Post-stack 4D seismic time-shifts: Interpretation and evaluation.Geophysical Prospecting,67(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12688.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. and Dvorkin, J.
    [2009]. The Rock Physics Handbook. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626753.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nur, A., Mavko, G., Dvorkin, J. and Galmudi, D.
    [1995]. Critical porosity: A key to relating physical properties to porosity in rocks.SEG Annual Meeting,878–881. https://doi.org/10.1190/E1887540.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Spence, M.
    [2014]. The Volve Rollercoaster, From Setbacks to New Opportunities.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stammeijer, J.G.F. and Hatchell, PJ.
    [2014]. Standards in 4D feasibility and interpretation.The Leading Edge,33(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle33020134.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Thomas, D.W. and Coward, M.P.
    [1996]. Mesozoic regional tectonics and South Viking Graben formation: evidence for localized thin-skinned detachments during rift development and inversion.Marine and Petroleum Geology,13(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(95)00034-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Thompson, M., Arntsen, B. and Amundsen, L.
    [2007]. Experiences with full-azimuth acquisition in ocean bottom seismic.First Break,25(3), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.2007012.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error