1887
Volume 38, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Seismic processing parameter mining – the past may be the key to the present, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/fb/38/6/fb2020043-1.gif

There is no abstract available for this article.
Use the preview function to the left.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020043
2020-06-01
2020-07-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bekara, M. and Day, A.
    [2019]. Automatic QC of denoise processing using a machine learning classification. First Break, 37(9), 51–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell, A. C, Russo, R., Martin, T., van der Burg, D. and Caselitz, B.P.
    [2016]. A workflow to quantify velocity model uncertainty. 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We P7 11.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Martin, T., Saturni, C. and Ashby, P.
    [2015]. Using machine learning to produce a global automated quantitative QC for noise attenuation. 85th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4790–4794.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Martin, T. and Bell, B.
    [2019]. An innovative approach to automation for velocity model building. First Break,37(6), 57–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sheridan, T. and Verplank, W.
    [1978]. Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. MIT Technical Report, 187.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020043
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020043
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error