Volume 38, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
Preview this article:
Zoom in

Seismic processing parameter mining – the past may be the key to the present, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/fb/38/6/fb2020043-1.gif

There is no abstract available for this article.
Use the preview function to the left.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bekara, M. and Day, A.
    [2019]. Automatic QC of denoise processing using a machine learning classification. First Break, 37(9), 51–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell, A. C, Russo, R., Martin, T., van der Burg, D. and Caselitz, B.P.
    [2016]. A workflow to quantify velocity model uncertainty. 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We P7 11.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Martin, T., Saturni, C. and Ashby, P.
    [2015]. Using machine learning to produce a global automated quantitative QC for noise attenuation. 85th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4790–4794.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Martin, T. and Bell, B.
    [2019]. An innovative approach to automation for velocity model building. First Break,37(6), 57–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sheridan, T. and Verplank, W.
    [1978]. Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. MIT Technical Report, 187.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error