Leveraging deep learning for seismic image denoising

References

1. Alerini, M. and Ursin, B.
   [2009]. Adaptive focusing window for seismic angle migration.Geophysics, 74 (1), S1–S10.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ball, V., Blangy, J.P., Pringle, K. and Schwark, J.
   [2011]. Seismic rock physics in the presence of attribute noise.81st SEG Annual Meeting, Extended Abstracts, 355–359.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cambois, G.
   [2001]. AVO processing: Myths and reality.71st SEG Annual Meeting, Extended Abstracts.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chemingui, N. and Biondi, B.
   [2002]. Seismic data reconstruction by inversion to common offset.Geophysics, 67, 1575–1585.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Farmani, B. and Pedersen, M.
   [2020]. Extended Attributes for Machine Learning Denoise Process: First Step Towards Automation.82nd EAGE conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gardner, G. H. F. and Canning, A.
   [1994]. Effects of irregular sampling on 3-D prestack migration.64th SEG Annual International Meeting. Expanded Abstracts, 1553–1556.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Goodfellow, I., Bengio Y. and Courville, A.
   [2017]. Deep learning.MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hale, D.
   [2011]. Structure-oriented bilateral filtering of seismic images.81st SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3596–3600.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Jia, Y. and Ma, J.
   [2017]. What can machine learning do for seismic processing? An interpolation application.Geophysics, 82 (3), 163–177.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Klokov, A. and Fomel, S.
    [2012]. Optimal migration aperture for conflicting dips.82nd SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Martin, T, Saturni, C., Ashby, P.
    [2015]. Using machine learning to produce a global automated quantitative QC for noise attenuation.85th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 4790–4794.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Øye, O. K. and Dahl, E. K.
    [2019]. Velocity Model Building from Raw Shot Gathers Using Machine Learning.81st EAGE conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. and Brox, T.
    [2015]. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for biomedical Image Segmentation.Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), 9351, 234–241.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Schonewille, M., Klaedtke, A., Vigner, A., Brittan, J. and Martin, T.
    [2009]. Seismic data regularization with the anti-alias anti-leakage Fourier transform.First Break, 27, 85–92.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Turquais, P., Söllner, W. and Pedersen, M.
    [2019]. Parabolic Dictionary Learning: A Method or Seismic Data Reconstruction Beyond the Linearity Assumption.81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Yang, F. and Ma, J.
    [2019]. Deep-learning inversion: A next-generation seismic velocity model building method.Geophysics, 84 (4), 583–599.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Zheng, Y., Zhang, Q., Yusifov, A., Shi, Y.
    [2019]. Applications of supervised deep learning for seismic interpretation and inversion.The Leading Edge, 38 (7), 526–533.
    [Google Scholar]