1887
Volume 39 Number 1
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

In land geophysical exploration an impulsive or vibratory source, operating at the earth’s surface, is used to generate the seismic signal during the field acquisition. Comparisons of the manufacturer’s output specifications will often be a factor in selecting a seismic source for ‘good S/N’ (signal to noise ratio) in a particular survey area. For impulsive sources, such as dynamite, weight drop, and accelerated weight drop (AWD), the source specifications are given in energy units (Joules, foot-pounds) whereas vibroseis sources are rated in force units (Newtons, pounds-force). For either type of source, the manufacturer’s specifications are the output ‘power’ of the source mechanism and do not take into account any inefficiencies/losses in energy in the source mechanism or the interacting earth volume when generating the seismic signal. In this paper, I examine some of the factors that determine the transfer of energy from the source mechanism to the seismic signal and show, for AWD sources, the energy transfer during the impulse can be greatly improved by optimization of the source parameters. For vibrators, the energy transfer to the ground may be a better indicator of the propagating wave than the current WSGF estimates.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021005
2021-01-01
2021-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dean, T., et al
    [2014] The Limitations of Generating Broadband Signals, EAGE, Land and Ocean Bottom – Broadband Full Azimuth Seismic Surveys Workshop, Mallorca, Spain, 28 April–2 May 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, G., et al
    [2020] Modelling of energy transfer and parameter effects on it of a vibrator-ground system.Advances in Structural Engineering, February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lysmer, et al
    [1966] Dynamic Response of Footings to Vertical Loadings, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, January 1966, 63–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. O’Brien, P.
    [1969] Some experiments concerning the primary seismic pulse, Geophysical Prospecting, 17(4, 511–547.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rowse, S. L. and Heath, R.
    [2020] WSGF – Time for a change part 1: Damped Harmonic Oscillators and the Vibrator/Ground model, First Break, 38, 63–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sallas, J.
    [2010] How do hydraulic vibrators work? A look inside the black box, Geophysical Prospecting, 2010. 58, 3–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Timoshenko, S.
    [1951] Theory of Elasticity, Engineering Societies Monographs 1951.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tinkle, A. and Rowse, S.L.
    [2010] Toward a Simplified Model of Vibrator Seismic Source Performance: Preliminary Results, 2010 SEG Annual Meeting, 17–22 October, Denver, Colorado.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wei, Z.
    [2010] Fundamental discussions on seismic vibrators, Geophysics, 75(6), W13–W25.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021005
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error