1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. First Break
  4. Volume 39, Issue 10
  5. Article
Volume 39, Issue 10
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Gas injection has been evaluated and implemented in the large carbonate oil field located offshore Qatar as water alternating gas or WAG. It has been seen that WAG is economically viable and a robust enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method for homogenous formations. However, using WAG in heterogeneous parts of the field has not been attempted due to issues like early gas breakthrough and unfavourable sweep efficiency. Hence, it was decided to design a foam-assisted WAG system that can provide the required conformance control to mitigate those issues and expand the use of WAG. A complete laboratory programme was carried out to screen the best foaming surfactant formulation that resulted in the selection of environmentally friendly, Alkyl polyglucoside (APG) surfactant. Surfactant testing involved foamability in porous media under oil-wet and water-wet conditions in presence of residual oil to gas flood. The chosen surfactant showed good foam strength in both cases with effective mobility reduction factors (MRF) above 20. The impact of mobile oil was also observed by co-injecting oil during linear core flood experiments, which clearly showed that good foam strength could be achieved in a lower flow fraction of mobile oil with foam. Additionally, boosting of foam strength using amphoteric Lauryl Betaine (LB) surfactant was also performed. The formulation with APG/LB (70%/30%) gives foam boosting of 2.5 times compared to foam strength using APG alone. Additionally, it was shown that altering wettability using a nonionic Tergitol surfactant (TGT-1) as pre-flush and then injecting APG-5 surfactant and methane resulted in foam strength, which is 1.5 times higher than observed in oil-wet conditions.

EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021079
2021-10-01
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021079
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Awan, Anwar R., Teigland, Rune, and Kleppe, Jon. [2008]. A Survey of North Sea Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Projects Initiated During the Years 1975 to 2005.SPE-99546-PA , 11 (03), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.2118/99546-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Basheva, Elka S., Ganchev, Dragomir, and Denkov, Nikolai D. et al. [2000]. Role of Betaine as Foam Booster in the Presence of Silicone Oil Drops.Langmuir, 16(3), 1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1021/la990777+.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackwell, R. J., Rayne, J. R. and Terry, W. M. [1959]. Factors Influencing the Efficiency of Miscible Displacement.SPE-1131-G, 8. https://doi.org/.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blaker, Tore , Aarra, Morten G. and Skauge, Arne et al. [2002]. Foam for Gas Mobility Control in the Snorre Field: The FAWAG Project.SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 5(4), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.2118/78824-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Christensen, J. R., Stenby, E. H. and Skauge, A. [1998]. Review of WAG Field Experience.Proc., International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico, 1998/01/01/, 14. https://doi.org/10.2118/39883-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Claridge, E. L. [1972]. Prediction of Recovery in Unstable Miscible Flooding.SPE-2930-PA , 12(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.2118/2930-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Da, Chang, Elhag, Armo, Jian, Guoqing et al. [2018]. CO2/Water Foams Stabilized with Cationic or Zwitterionic Surfactants at Temperatures up to 120°C in High Salinity Brine.Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2018/09/24/, 14. https://doi.org/10.2118/191479-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Dalland, Mariann, Hanssen , JanErik , and Kristiansen, Tove Strøm . 1994. Oil interaction with foams under static and flowing conditions in porous media.Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 82(2), 129–140. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/092777579302628R.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Das, S., Nguyen, Q., Patil, P.D., Yu, W. and Bonnecaze, R.T. Wettability Alteration of Calcite by Nonionic Surfactants.Langmuir2018, 34, 10650–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02098.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghosh, Pinaki , and Kishore K.Mohanty . ‘Novel Application of Cationic Surfactants for Foams With Wettability Alteration in Oil-Wet Low-Permeability Carbonate Rocks.’ SPE J., 23 (2018), 2218–2231. doi: https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/10.2118/179598-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Heller, J.P., Dandge, D.K. and Card, R.J. et al. [1985]. Direct Thickeners for Mobility Control of CO2 Floods.Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 25(5), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.2118/11789-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Homsy, G. [2003]. Viscous Fingering In Porous Media.Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 19, 271–311.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Lindeloff, N., Mogensen, K. and van Lingen, P.P. et al. [2008]. Fluid-Phase Behaviour for a Miscible-Gas-Injection EOR Project in a Giant Offshore Oil Field With Large Compositional Variations.Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2008/01/01/, 21. https://doi.org/10.2118/115970-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Mannhardt, K. and Svorstøl, I. [1999]. Effect of oil saturation on foam propagation in Snorre reservoir core.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering – J Pet Sci Engineering, 23, 189–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. M’Barki, O., Brame, S., Castellanos Diaz, O., Katiyar, A., Crosley, M. and Knight, T. et al. The effect of rock composition and microstructure on steam foam rheology in sandstone reservoirs.Fuel2021;287:119471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119471.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Sakai, T. and Kaneko, Y. [2004]. The effect of some foam boosters on ability and foam stability of anionic systems.Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 7, 291–295.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Schramm, L. and Novosad, J. [1990]. Micro-visualization of foam interactions with a crude oil.Colloids and Surfaces, 46(1), 21–43. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0166662290800467.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Stalkup, Fred I. Jr. [1983]. Status of Miscible Displacement.SPE-9992-PA, 35(04): 815–826. https://doi.org/10.2118/9992-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Taha, M., Kumar, A., Patil, P., Pal, M. and NguyenQ P. Evaluation of First-Ever Foam Assisted Conformance Control for a Middle Eastern Carbonate Reservoir Offshore Qatar.IOR2021, vol. 2021, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers; 2021, p. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202133105.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, Y., Yue, X., Liu, K., Zhang, B. and Ling, Q. Effect of permeability on foam mobility and flow resistance distribution: An experimental study.Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects2019;582:123769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123769.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021079
Loading
Impact of oil and wettability on foam-assisted conformance control in a Middle Eastern carbonate reservoir
First Break 39, 75 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021079
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021079
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021079
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error