1887
Volume 40 Number 1
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

All land seismic sources are inefficient in the conversion of their energy/force, generated at the surface, into useful seismic signals. It is not commonly known that less than 5% of the source’s energy is converted into energy of the propagating wave. Until now, one of the objectives of the designers of land seismic sources has been to increase the maximum force (or energy) output at the surface to increase the amplitude of the seismic signal. Today’s vibroseis sources, at about 40 tonnes, are at their maximum size and weight limits for many road infrastructures limiting their areas of use, as well as being beyond the budget of most seismic operators. As force output is related to vehicle weight (hold down force), the vibroseis source is effectively at its maximum output (and therefore maximum seismic signal) under its current configuration. For this reason, to achieve further increases in the amplitude and frequency content of the propagating seismic signals, the emphasis in future research and development must be in understanding the many factors that are involved in the conversion of the force/energy generated by the surface source into useful seismic signals. This has been missing in the past; it is where only physicists can play a role.

In this article, we discuss the physics of impulsive and vibroseis sources and their interactions with the ground to show that improving the amplitude/frequency content and efficiency of the vibrator, especially at low frequencies, cannot be fixed by ‘mere engineering’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022006
2022-01-01
2022-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bagaini, C.
    Enhancing the low-frequency content of Vibroseis dataSEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Karasa et al.
    Method for acquiring deep onshore reflection data in the Gulf of Suez, Geophysics: the leading edge of exploratlon, July 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hampshire, J.B.
    [2013]. The seismic hammer, Power Point Presentation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Meunier, J. and Daures, R.
    [2008]. Seismic Source Comparison, Vibroseis Workshop – Prague, Czech Republic.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. O’Brien, P.
    Some experiments concerning the primary seismic pulse Presented at the 30th meeting of the European Association of Exploration Geophysicists, Salzburg, June 1968.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rowse, S.L. and Heath, R.
    WSGF - Time for a change part 1: Damped Harmonic Oscillators and the Vibrator/Ground model.First Break, 38, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sallas, J.
    How do hydraulic vibrators work? A look inside the black box.Geophysical Prospecting, 2010. 58, 3–17.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022006
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022006
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error