1887
Volume 40, Issue 10
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO) is considered an enabler of different business models aligned with decarbonization of the energy market. Partnerships are forming worldwide to develop large-scale carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) projects: 2021 was a record year for project pipeline growth for these types of projects. This growth will result in an increasing need for subsurface technologies that can unlock fast time-to-results throughout all the steps of the project, from site selection to storage monitoring.

At an early stage of a carbon storage project, a thorough verification of the technical and economic viability of the project is critical. The high degree of geological uncertainties in the case of storage in under-explored saline aquifers can make this step challenging. As the project progresses, fast assimilation of monitoring data to prove conformance and update predictions of the storage complex performance is key.

An advanced technology from AspenTech can serve as a catalyst for efficient carbon storage studies. It tightly integrates static and dynamic domains and offers the propagation of uncertainties, from seismic characterization through to geological modelling and simulation. Using results from a large set of models increases predictability of the subsurface and enables more efficient analysis of uncertainty in predicted storage capacity and containment. This fully automated workflow can be run at will with new data, drastically reducing the time needed by carbon storage teams to update the model and the predictions as monitoring data is acquired.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022081
2022-10-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/fb/40/10/fb2022081.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022081&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abd-Allah, M., Walia, S., Walsh, S. and Topdemir, S. [2017]. Protecting Return on Investment through Automated Ensemble-based Quantification of Risk – Norwegian Offshore Field Case Study. 79th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bordas, R. et Al. [2020]. A Bayesian Optimisation Workflow for Field Development Planning Under Geological Uncertainty, Conference Proceedings, ECMOR XVII, Sep 2020, Volume 2020, p.1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Taha, T. et Al. [2019]. History Matching using 4D Seismic in an Integrated Multi-disciplinary Automated Workflow, 7th SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition. SPE-196680-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022081
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022081
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error