oa How a Multidisciplinary, Data-Driven Geoscience Approach is Required to Help Achieve the Energy Transition Goals

References

1. Allo, F., Coulon, J.P., Formento, J.L., Reboul, R., Capar, L., Darnet, M., Issautier, B., Marc, S. and Stopin, A. [2021]. Characterization of a carbonate geothermal reservoir using rock-physics-guided deep neural networks. The Leading Edge, 40(10), pp. 751–758.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arts, R.J., Chadwick, A., Eiken, O., ThibeauS. and Nooner, S. [2008]. Ten years’ experience of monitoring CO2 injection in the Utsira Sand at Sleipner, offshore Norway. First Break, 26(1), pp 65–72. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.26.1115.27807
   [Google Scholar]
3. Booth, M., Porjesz, R., Otto, S., Duval, G., Park, P., Khalid, A., Olivares, C., Calvert, S. and Satterley, A. [2022]. Basin-Scale CO2 Storage Site Screening – an Example from the Northern North Sea Basin. EAGE GeoTech 2022 Sixth EAGE Workshop on CO2 Geological Storage, Apr 2022, Volume 2022, p.1–5https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20224024.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bunker, E., Bolton, R., Crossley, R., Broadley, M. and Thomas, A. [2022]. Lithium Exploration Tools from Source to Sink, GeoConvention 2022, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Davies, D. and Rietveld, W. [2020]. The Journey to 1M Resolution at Clair – Lessons From Acquisition and Processing. Second EAGE Marine Acquisition Workshop, Volume 2020, p.1–3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202034003.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Heinemann, N., Booth, M. G., Haszeldine, R. S., Wilkinson, M., Scafidi, J. and Edlmann, K. [2018]. Hydrogen storage in porous geological formations – onshore play opportunities in the midland valley (Scotland, UK). International journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(45), 20861–20874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.149.
   [Google Scholar]
7. IEA [2020]. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2020.
   [Google Scholar]
8. IPBES [2019]. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. https://ipbes.net/document-li-brary-catalogue/global-assessment-report.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ren, D., He, X., Xu, S., Gao, F., Lin, F. and Mei, J. [2022]. FWI for the complex Walker Ridge salt province using streamer data. Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, DOI:10.1190/image2022‑3744364.1.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/image2022-3744364.1 [Google Scholar]
10. Satterley, A., Pongthunya, P., Imber, J., McCaffrey, K., Gluyas, J., Wilkinson, M., Sowter, A., Nielsen, S., de Paola, N., Jones, R., Jordan, P. and Moors, A. [2020]. Enhanced Oil Recovery as a second revenue stream in a gas storage facility; understanding and monitoring the Humbly Grove Field, Hampshire, UK. First Break, 38(9), Sep 2020, p. 79–87. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020069
    [Google Scholar]
11. Schulz, M. [2016]. Rechtliche Anforderungen an die Zulassung stofflicher Speicher in Salzkavernen. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Vellappally, A., Hou, S., Love, M., Watkins, F. and Jackson-Bue, T. [2022]. Machine learning for benthic taxon Identification. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, April 25–29, London.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Viner, D., Smith, A. and Gold, D., [2022]. Maximising land use and minimising its impact. Geoconnexion International Magazine, 21(2), p. 38–39.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Wang, P., Zhang, Z., Mei, J., Lin, F. andHuang, R. [2019]. Full-waveform inversion for salt: A coming of age. The Leading Edge, 38(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle38030204.1
    [Google Scholar]
15. Whittle, T.M., Park, P. and Coll, C. [2022]. A Semi-Analytical Model for the Prediction of CO2 Injectivity into Saline Aquifers or Depleted Hydrocarbon Reservoirs. SPE EuropEC, June 2022. SPE-209628-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/209628-MS.
    [Google Scholar]