1887
Volume 41, Issue 8
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

This article will discuss the benefits of optimised production planning when installing new, and/or maintaining existing, buried infrastructure. Optimised production planning is cost effective and reduces risks for damages and accidents. To optimise production planning, all available information in an area of interest needs to be collected. This is traditionally achieved through the combined use of drawings, visual inspections, data collected with EM locators and GPR, and often also making test pits.

As of late, specific planning software using 3D GPR array data and other input has become the preferred choice for time effective and detailed production planning. GPR array investigations can often detect and map all existing buried assets in high detail, thus reducing project time. The article will show results from a project performed in Stockholm, Sweden, using MALÅ 3D GPR array technologies and the Terra Eye software platform.

EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2023061
2023-08-01
2026-02-08

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2023061
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Booth, A., Linford, N., Clark, R.A. and Murray, T. [2008]. Three-dimensional, multi-offset ground-penetrating radar imaging of archaeological targets.Archaeological Prospection, 15(2), 93–112.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Emilsson, J., Gustafsson, J., Viberg, A., Langton, M. and Friborg, J. [2020]. Efficient state-of-the-art 3D HDR GPR array surveys compared to traditional 2D utility investigations.Near Surface Geoscience, 20. 7–8 December 2020, online.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Emilsson, J., Gustafsson, J., Langton, M. and Viberg, A. [2021]. Higher resolution antenna technique for efficient large-scale, 3D array GPR investigations. The 14th SEGJ (The Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan). 18th–21 October 2021, online.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Grasmueck, M., Weger, R. and Horsmeyer, H. [2005]. Full-resolution 3D GPR imaging. Geophysics, 70, K12–K19.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Nov, A., Grasmueck, M., Viggiano, D. and Lorenzo, H. [2008]. 3D GPR in archaeology: what can be gained from dense data acquisition and processing? In Proceedings, 12th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR 2008), Birmingham, 16–19 June, 5.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Trinks, I., Johansson, B., Gustafsson, J., Emilsson, J., Friborg, J., Gustafsson, C. and Hinterleitner, A. [2010]. Efficient, large-scale archaeological prospection using a true three-dimensional ground-penetrating radar array system.Archaeological Prospection, 17, 175–186.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Trinks, I., Hinterleitner, A., Neubauer, W., Wallner, M. and Seren, S. [2018]. Large-area high-resolution ground-penetrating radar measurements for archaeological prospection.Archaeological Prospection, 25, 171–195.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2023061
Loading
3D Gpr Array Technology for Optimisation of Production Planning in Infrastructure Projects
First Break 41, 55 (2023); https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2023061
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2023061
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2023061
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error