Advances in Seismic Imaging of Quick Clays in Sweden

References

1. Larsson, A. [2021]. Landslides vs Archaeology: Case Studies of Site Loss and Emergency Fieldwork in Västra Götaland County, Sweden.Current Swedish Archaeology, 29(1), 183–205.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Larsson, R. and Jansson, M. [1982]. The landslide at Tuve: Swedish geotechnical institute (SGI).Report No. 18, 1–118.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Lundberg, E., Malehmir, A., Juhlin, C., Bastani, M. and Andersson, M. [2014]. High-resolution 3D reflection seismic investigation over a quickclay landslide scari in southwest Sweden.Geophysics, 79(2), 1942–2156.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Malehmir, A. [2019]. Recording Longer for Higher-Resolution Near-Surface Imaging – Shear-Wave Reflections from Vertical Sources and Receivers: 25th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Malehmir, A. [2021]. The forgotten shear-wave reflections in the compressional-wave surveys: NSG2021 27th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Malehmir, A., Bastani, M., Krawczyk, C.M., Gurk, M., Ismail, N., Polom, U. and Persson, L. [2013a]. Geophysical assessment and geotechnical investigation of quick-clay landslides – a Swedish case study.Near Surface Geophysics, 11, 341–350.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Malehmir, A., Saleem, M.U. and Bastani, M. [2013b]. High-resolution reflection seismic investigations of quick-clay an associated formation at a landslide scar in southwest Sweden: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 92, 84–102.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Papadopoulou, M., Malehmir, A., Berglund, J. and Brodic, B. [2022]. Quick-Clay Site Characterization Through First-Break Tomography and Surface-Wave Analysis, A Study from Southwest of Sweden: 83rd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Pertuz, T. and Malehmir, A. [2022a]. 9C data acquisition for near-surface imaging in a quick-clay landslide-prone site in SW Sweden: Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, 2128–2132.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Pertuz, T. and Malehmir, A. [2022b]. Potential of a Multi-Component Seismic survey at a Quick-Clay Landslide-Prone Area: NGSG2022 285h European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Pertuz, T. and Malehmir, A. [2023]. Ultra-high-resolution shear-wave reflection imaging of vertical-component data in a quick-clay prone to landslide area in southwest Sweden.Geophysics, 83, B121–B133.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Rankka, K., Andersson-Skold, Y., Hulten, C., Larsson, R., Leroux, V. and Dahlin, T. [2004]. Quick clay in Sweden.Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Report 65, 1–137.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Salas-Romero, S., Malehmir, A., Snowball, I. and Dessirier, B. [2019]. Subsurface characterization of a quick-clay vulnerable area using near-surface geophysics and hydrological modelling.Solid Earth, 10(5), 1685–1705.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Torrance, J.K. [2012]. Landslides in quick clay, Chapter 8, in: Landslides: Types, Mechanisms and Modelling, Cambridge University Press, 83–94.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Tryggvason, A. and Bergman, B. [2006]. A traveltime reciprocity discrepancy in the Podvin & Lecomte time3d finite difference algorithm.Geophysical Journal International, 165, 432–435.
    [Google Scholar]