Multi-Scenario Deep Learning 4D Inversion: a Brazil Pre-Salt Case Study

References

1. Cao, J. and Roy, B. [2017]. Time-lapse reservoir property change estimation from seismic using machine learning: The Leading Edge, 36(3), 234–238, doi: 10.1190/tle36030234.1.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/tle36030234.1 [Google Scholar]
2. Côrte, G., Dramsch, J., Amini, H. and MacBeth, C. [2020]. Deep neural network application for 4D seismic inversion to changes in pressure and saturation: Optimizing the use of synthetic training, Geophysical Prospecting, 68, 2164–2185.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cruz, N., Cruz, J., Teixeira, L., Costa, M., Oliveira, L., Urasaki, E., Bispo, T., Jardim, M., Grochau, M. and Maul, A. [2021]. Tupi Nodes pilot: A successful 4D seismic case for Brazilian presalt reservoirs, The Leading Edge, 40, 886–896.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dramsch, J., Côrte, G., Amini, H. and Lüthje, M. [2019]. Including Physics in Deep Learning – An Example from 4D Seismic Pressure Saturation Inversion, 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition Workshop Program.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Duan, Y., Yuan, S., Hatchell, P., Villa, J. and Wang, K. [2020]. Estimation of time-lapse timeshifts using machine learning.SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2020 (pp. 3724–3728). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kaur, H., Zhong, Z., Sun, A. and Fomel, S. [2022]. Time-lapse seismic data inversion for estimating reservoir parameters using deep learning, Interpretation, 10(1).
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kumar, G.K. and Kleemeyer, M.K. [2013]. 4D Probabilistic Seismic Inversion for Assisted History Matching, EAGE/SPE Joint Workshop on Beyond Closed Loop Integrated Monitoring.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Li, B. and Li, Y.E. [2021]. Neural network-based CO2 interpretation from 4D Sleipner seismic images.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022524.
   [Google Scholar]
9. MacBeth, Floricich, C.M. and Soldo, J. [2006]. Going quantitative with 4D seismic analysis, Geophysical Prospecting, 2006. 54, 303–317.
   [Google Scholar]
10. MacBeth, C. [2004]. A classification for the pressure sensitivity properties of a sandstone rockframe.Geophysics, 69, 497–510.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Maleki, M., Cirne, M., José Schiozer, D., Davolio, A. and Rocha, A. [2022]. A machine-learning framework to estimate saturation changes from 4D seismic data using reservoir models, Geophysical Prospecting, 70, 1388–1409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13249
    [Google Scholar]
12. Maxwell, A., Bester, M., Guillen, L., Ramezan, C., Carpinello, D., Fan, Y., Hartley, M., Maynard, S. and Pyron, J. [2020]. Semantic Segmentation Deep Learning for Extracting Surface Mine Extents from Historic Topographic Maps, Remote Sensing, 12(24), 4145. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244145.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Rosa, D.R., Santos, J.M.C., Souza, R.M., Grana, D., Schiozer, D.J., Davolio, A. and Wang, Y. [2020]. Comparing different approaches of time-lapse seismic inversion, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 17, 929–939.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Rosa, D.R., Schiozer, D. J. and Davolio, A. [2022]. Enhancing vertical resolution with 4D seismic inversion, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 212, 110291.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ronneberger, O., Fisher, P. and Brox, T. [2015]. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04597.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Slater, C.P., Fletcher, J., Walder, D., Marsh, J. and MacGregor, J. [2002]. 4D monitoring of Schiehallion Field, UKCS.64th EAGE Conference, Florence, Italy, Extended Abstracts, A025.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sun, Y.F. [2000]. Core-log-seismic integration in hemipelagic marine sediments on the eastern flank of the Juan de Fuca Ridge, Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program. Scientific Results, 168, 21–35.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Tian, S., Shams, A. and Macbeth, C. [2014]. Closing the loops using engineering-consistent 4D seismic inversion: The Leading Edge, 33(2), 188–196.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Wright, V.P. and Barnett, A. [2015]. An abiotic model for the development of textures in some South Atlantic early Cretaceous lacustrine carbonates: Geol. Soc. Lon. Spec. Pub. 418(1): 209. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP418.3.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Xue, Y. [2013]. Novel stochastic inversion methods and workflow for reservoir characterisation and monitoring, https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/23205.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Xue, Y., Araujo, M., Lopez, J., Wang, K. and Gautam, K. [2019]. Machine learning to reduce cycle time for time-lapse seismic data into reservoir management, Interpretation, 7(3), https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2018-0206.1.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Yang, X., Chen, X. and Smith, M. [2022]. Deep learning inversion of gravity data for detection of CO2 plumes in overlying aquifers, Journal of Applied Geophysics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104507.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Zhang, Y., Wei, L., Charley, S. and Kumar, R. [2021]. A practical ML workflow to quantify dynamic reservoir property changes from 4D seismic, SEG/AAPG/SEPM First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, Denver, Colorado, USA and online, doi:https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2021-3577776.1.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Zhang, S., Si, H., Wu, X. and Yan, S. [2022]. A comparison of deep learning methods for seismic impedance inversion, Petroleum Science, 19, 1019–1030.
    [Google Scholar]