1887
Volume 41, Issue 12
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

For subsurface commercial ventures or environmental projects that rely on maps of faulted horizons, accurate maps are fundamental. Fault topology provides an ideal tool for analysis of connectivity of fault systems. The data required to undertake the analysis is straightforward to extract from fault maps and can readily be compared to analogue data. In this paper we introduce the concept of fault topology and present existing and new analogue data. To get the most from applying topology the analysis must be coupled with knowledge of the structural history. This includes, the magnitude of faulting, the number of phases of activity and the angle of intersection of successive faulting events. We present a series of case studies that firstly illustrate how topology can capture and define variations in connectivity of fault systems and, secondly, demonstrate how fault topology can be used to identify potential anomalies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2023098
2023-12-01
2025-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brook, G.R., Wardell, J.R., Flanagan, S.F. and Regan, T.P. [2010]. The Scott Field: revitalization of a mature field.Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series. 7, 387–403.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Clifton, A.E., Schlische, R.W., Withjack, M.O. and Ackermann, R.V. [2000]. Influence of rift obliquity on fault-population systematics: results of experimental clay models.Journal of Structural Geology, 22(10), 1491–1509.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cowie, P.A. and Scholz, C.H. [1992]. Displacement-length scaling relationship for faults: data synthesis and discussion.Journal of Structural Geology, 14(10), 1149–1156.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De Jager, J. and Visser, C. [2017]. Geology of the Groningen field–an overview.Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 96(5), s3–s15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DuffyO.B., NixonC.W., BellR.E., JacksonC.A.L., GawthorpeR.L., SandersonD.J. and WhippP.S. [2017]. The topology of evolving rift fault networks: Single-phase vs multi-phase rifts.Journal of Structural Geology, 96, 192–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards, C.W. [1991]. The Buchan Field, Blocks 20/5a and 21/1a, UK North Sea.Geological Society, London, Memoirs. 14, 253–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fossen, H. and Hesthammer, J. [1998]. Structural geology of the Gullfaks field, northern North Sea.Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 127(1), 231–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Frankowicz, E. and McClay, K.R. [2010]. Extensional fault segmentation and linkages, Bonaparte Basin, outer North West Shelf, Australia.AAPG Bulletin, 94, No.7977–1010.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Freeman, B., Boult, P.J., Yielding, G. and Menpes, S. [2010]. Using empirical geological rules to reduce structural uncertainty in seismic interpretation of faults.Journal of Structural Geology, 32, 1668–1676.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Husmo, T., Hamar, G.P., Høiland, O., Johannessen, E.P., Rømuld, A., Spencer, A.M. and Titterton, R. [2003]. Lower and middle Jurassic. The Millennium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and Northern North Sea. Geol. Soc. London, 129–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Henza, A.A., Withjack, M.O. and Schlische, R.W. [2011]. How do the properties of a pre-existing normal-fault population influence fault development during a subsequent phase of extension?Journal of Structural Geology, 33(9).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Imber, J., Tuckwell, G.W., Childs, C., Walsh, J.J., Manzocchi, T., Heath, A.E., Bonson and Strand, C.G J. [2004]. Three-dimensional distinct element modelling of relay growth and breaching along normal faults.Journal of Structural Geology, 26(10). 1897–1911.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kania, M. and Szczęch, M. [2020]. Geometry and topology of tectonolin-eaments in the Gorce Mts. (Outer Carpathians) in Poland, Journal of Structural Geology141. 104186.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Manzocchi, T. [2002]. The connectivity of two-dimensional networks of spatially correlated fractures.Water Resources Research38, 1162.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Marshall, J.E.A. and Hewett, A.J. [2003]. Devonian.The Millennium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and North Sea. Geol. Soc. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mendes, L de C., Correia, U.M.C., Cunha, O.R., Oliveira, F.M. and Vidal, A.C. [2022]. Topological analysis of fault network in naturally fractured reservoirs: A case study from the pre-salt section of the Santos Basin, Brazil, Journal of Structural Geology, 159. 103930
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MorleyC.K. and BinazirnejadH. [2020]. Investigating polygonal fault topological variability: Structural causes vs image resolution, Journal of Structural Geology, 130. 103930.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Morley, C.K. and Nixon, C.W. [2016]. Topological characteristics of simple and complex normal fault networks, Journal of Structural Geology, 84. 68–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mulrooney, M.J., Osmond, J.L., Skurtveit, E., Faleide, J.I. and Braathen, A. [2020]. Structural analysis of the Smeaheia fault block, a potential CO2 storage site, northern Horda Platform, North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology121.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nicol, J., Watterson, J., Walsh, J.J. and Childs, C [1996]. The shapes, major axis orientations and displacement patters of fault surfaces, Journal of Structural Geology, 18, 235–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ortega, O. and Marrett, R. [2000]. Prediction of microfracture properties using microfracture information Mesaverde Group sandstones, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.Journal of Structural Geology, 22(5), 571–588.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Osagiede, E.E., Nixon, C.W., Gawthorpe, R., Rotevatn, A., Fossen, H., Jackson, C., and Tillmans, F. [2023]. Topological characterisation of fault network along the northern North Sea rift margin.Tectonics, e2023TC007841.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Preiss, A.D. and Adam, J. [2021]. Basement fault trends in the Southern North Sea Basin.Journal of Structural Geology, 153, 104449.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Richards, F.L., Richardson, N.J., Bond, C.E. and Cowgill, M. [2015]. Interpretational variability of structural traps: implications for exploration risk and volume uncertainty.Geol. Soc. of London, Special Publications421, 7–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sanderson, D.J. and Nixon, C.W. [2015]. The use of topology in fracture network characterization.Journal of Structural Geology, 72, 55–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Stober, I., Fritzer, T., Obst, K., Agemar, T. and Schulz, R. [2017]. Deep Geothermal Energy: Principles and Application Possibilities in Germany.Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Industry.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Walsh, J.J. and Watterson, J. [1988]. Analysis of the relationship between displacements and dimensions of faults.Journal of Structural Geology, 10(3), 239–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Walsh, J.J. and Watterson, J. [1992]. Populations of faults and fault displacements and their effects on estimates of fault-related regional extension.Journal of Structural Geology, 14(6), 701–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zanella, E. and Coward, M.P. [2003]. Structural framework. Chapter 4, The Millennium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and North Sea. Geol. Soc. London.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2023098
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2023098
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error