1887
Volume 42, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Modern marine-streamer time-lapse (4D) seismic projects generally use broadband processing flows that compensate source and receiver ghost effects. They are mostly very successful, but it can occasionally be difficult to achieve an accurate match between the surveys at low frequencies. A test project using data from the Heidrun field, offshore Norway, suggested that broadband processing can exacerbate minor issues that are typically insignificant for non-broadband flows. Seismic surveys acquired with multisensor marine streamer systems tend to undergo wavefield separation and other processing during acquisition, with different acquisition contractors using differing workflows. This can cause discrepancies between the surveys that the 4D processing contractor cannot compensate. Similarly, ancillary datasets, such as farfield signatures, may be generated inconsistently. We recommend that time-lapse seismic processing begin with raw measurements wherever possible so that identical processing flows may be used for each survey. Even then, it may not be possible to completely compensate the impact of differing acquisition systems.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024030
2024-04-01
2025-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Caprioli, P., Özdemir, A., Ozbek, A., Kragh, E., Van Manen, D. J., Christie, P. and Robertsson, J.[2012]. Combination of Multi-component Streamer Pressure and Vertical Particle Velocity – Theory and Application to Data.74th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, A033.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dragoset, B., Moore, I., Yu, M. and Zhao, W.[2008]. 3D general surface multiple prediction: An algorithm for all surveys. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts2008, 2426–2430.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fischer, D., Sørenes, N., Teichmann, E., Blekastad, H., Moen, A.S., Sollie, I.H. and Smith, P.[2013]. Value creation by a long-term time-lapse seismic processing approach on the Heidrun field.First Break, 31(10), 93–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Halland, K.S., Blekastad, H.M., Torset, S., Haug, S.G., Lippard, J.M. and Antal, A.[2019]. The Use of 4D Seismic Data on the Heidrun Field.81st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We_R07_01.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rickett, J.E., van Manen, D.J., Loganathan, P. and Seymour, N.[2014]. Slanted-streamer Data-adaptive Deghosting with Local Plane Waves, 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Th. ELI1 15.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Shadrina, M., Leone, C., Cavalca, M., Fletcher, R. and Gherasim, M.[2019]. Revealing the Time-Lapse Signal from Non-Repeatable Vintages with 4D Depth-Domain Inversion.81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Th_R09_11.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Trinh, P., Nangiata, N., Makiona, E., Blanchard, T., Rappin, D., Baturin, M., Amn, M., Lafram, A., Grandi, A. and Adeyemi, A.[2022]. 4D Broadband: Added Values and Lessons Learnt – Integrated Study in a Depleted Field in Angola.83rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhao, W., Sadhnani, P., Huang, Y., Mothi, S., Schiott, C. R., Knapp, S. and Vincent, L.[2023]. 4D deghosting of multi-sensor streamer datasets from offshore Guyana.84th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024030
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024030
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error