1887
Volume 42, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024045
2024-06-01
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, D., Svetlichnyy, A., Zhelanov, V., Oukili, J., Schreuder, S., Taikulakov, Y., Chikichev, I. and Baumstein, A. [2022]. 3D demultiple techniques dramatically improve the imaging of a giant Kashagan reservoir in the ultra-shallow North Caspian Sea.First Break, 40(9), 51–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooper, C. [2023]. 3DHR Seismic Acquisition for CCS and considerations for Windfarm UHR. Seismic 2023, SPE, Aberdeen.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Furre, A.-K., Meneguolo, R., Ringrose, P. and Kassold, S. [2019]. Building confidence in CCS: From Sleipner to the Northern Lights Project.First Break, 37(7), 81–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gluyas, J.G. and Bagudu, U. [2020]. The Endurance CO2 storage site, Blocks 42/25 and 43/21, UK North Sea. Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 52, 163–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lloyd, C., Huuse, M., Barrett, B.J. and Newton, A.M.W. [2021]. Regional Exploration and Characterisation of CO2 Storage Prospects in the Utsira-Skade Aquifer, North Viking Graben, North Sea. Earth Science Systems and Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Oukili, J., Jokisch, T., Pankov, A., Farmani, B., Ronhølt, G., Korsmo, Ø., Raya, P.Y. and Midttun, M. [2015]. A novel 3D demultiple workflow for shallow water environments – a case study from the Brage field, North Sea.77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, N114.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Oukili, J., Gruffeille, J.-P., Otterbein, C. and Loidl, B. [2019]. Can high-resolution reprocessed data replace the traditional 2D high-resolution seismic data acquired for site surveys?First Break, 37(8), 49–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Rønholt, G., Korsmo, Ø., Naumann, S. and Marinets, S. [2015]. Complete wavefield imaging for lithology and fluid prediction in the Barents Sea.85th SEG Annual Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 4070–4074.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Reiser, C. and Ruiz, R. [2021]. Interactive rock physics for CCS and near field exploration, a UK Southern North Sea case study.EAGE Annual 2023, 84th Conference And Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ruiz, R., Roubickova, A., Reiser, C. and Banglawala, N. [2021]. Data mining and machine learning for porosity, saturation, and shear velocity prediction: recent experience and results.First Break, 39(7), 71–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rumyantsev, D., Mueller, E., Ahmed, M. and Georgy, M. [2023]. Addressing Subsurface Imaging Challenges for Conventional and Energy Transition Ventures in the South North Sea Using Modern Processing Workflows on Merged Legacy 3D Seismic Data. 2023 International Conference and Exhibition (ICE).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Widmaier, M., Roalkvam, C. and Orji, O. [2023]. Advanced 3D seismic crossover technologies between hydrocarbon exploration, CCS development, and offshore wind.First Break, 41(11), 53–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Whitmore, N.D., Valenciano, A.A., Söllner, W. and Lu, S. [2010]. Imaging of primaries and multiples using a dual-sensor towed streamer.80th SEG Annual Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 3187–3192.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024045
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024045
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error