1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. First Break
  4. Volume 42, Issue 9
  5. Article
Volume 42, Issue 9
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Oil and gas production from very low permeability shale reservoirs became a reality in the 1990s when Mitchel Energy developed novel fracking techniques, but the road ahead was very challenging until around 2008 when oil and gas production from low permeability shale reservoirs became a significant component of total oil and gas production in the US The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that in 2023, about 3.04 billion barrels (or about 8.32 million barrels per day) of crude oil were produced directly from tight-oil resources in the United States. This was equal to about 64% of total US crude oil production in 2023. Also, the current ultimate amount of oil production from such reservoirs is in the range of 3 to 8% of the in-place oil. Furthermore, the production rates from such reservoirs decline rapidly; thus, there is a compelling need for techniques to produce at least some of the enormous amounts of the remaining reservoir oil.

The classical waterflooding or gas flooding used in conventional reservoirs is not plausible in unconventional shale reservoirs because the injection fluid displacement velocities are extremely small which prohibits oil displacement through any injection-production well pattern. Therefore, creative and imaginative approaches are needed to increase oil production without relying on injecting large quantities of water or gas to produce additional incremental oil. The current techniques include two vastly different cyclic injection-production methods—known as the huff-n-puff process. The first method involves injecting either CO or rich gas in a multi-stage, hydraulically fractured, production well and soaking for a few days, then producing the same well which generally would yield substantially increased oil flow rates. The second method involves injecting low concentrations of aqueous solutions containing surfactants or mutual solvents. This method is also applied as a huff-n-puff process similar to the gas injection huff-n-puff process. The gas injection huff-n-puff process requires expensive high-pressure injection compressors while solvent injection huff-n-puff requires simpler and less expensive water injection pumps.

The mechanism of oil mobilisation by gas injection is generally due to mass transfer across gas-oil interface by molecular diffusion resulting in oil swelling, miscibility, viscosity reduction, and favourable shift in residual oil saturation in the oil relative permeability function. On the other hand oil mobilisation by surfactant solutions or mutual solvents includes reduction of the oil-water interfacial tension in the surfactant case, wettability alteration by surfactant and mutual solvents, and shift in residual oil saturation in the relative permeability function. Additionally, using a brine containing a mutual solvent or a surfactant results in substantial additional oil recovery first by cleaning the micro- and macro-fracture flow paths in the stimulated reservoir volume followed by changes in IFT, wettability, and irreducible oil solubilisation. In this paper we will present laboratory results, mathematical modelling concepts, and field results to illustrate each of the above processes.

EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024078
2024-09-01
2024-09-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024078
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alfarge, D., Wei, M. and Bai, B. [2017]. IOR methods in unconventional reservoirs of North America: Comprehensive review, SPE-185640-MS, 2017 SPE Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, April 23.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alfarge, D., Wei, M., Bai, B. and Alsaba, M. [2017]. Analysis of IOR pilots in Bakken formation by using numerical simulation, SPE-188633-MS, Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, November 13–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alghunaim, E., Uzun, O., Kazemi, H. and Sarg, J.F. [2021]. Cost-Effective Chemical EOR for Heterogenous Carbonate Reservoirs Using a Ketone-Surfactant System. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, UAE. SPE-205910-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/205910-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alharthy, N., Teklu, T. and Kazemi, H. [2017]. Enhanced Oil Recovery in Liquid–Rich Shale Reservoirs: Laboratory to Field.SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 21(1), 137–159. SPE-175034-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/175034-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Allawzi, M., Al-Otoom, Allaboun, H., Ajlouni, A. and Al Nseirat, F. [2011]. CO2 supercritical fluid extraction of Jordanian oil shale utilizing different co-solvers.J. Fuel Processing Technology. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.06.001.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Alvarez, J.O., Tovar, F.D., and Schechter, D.S. [2017]. Improving Oil Recovery in Unconventional Liquid Reservoirs by Soaking-Flowback Production Schedule with Surfactant Additives. Presented at the SPE Liquids-Rich Basins Conference - North America, Midland, Texas. SPE-187483-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/187483-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Ataceri, I.Z., Saputra, I.W.R., Bagareddy, A.R., Elkady, M.H., Schechter, D.S., Haddix, G.W., Brock, V.A., Raney, K.H., Strickland, C.W. and Morris, G.R. [2023]. Surfactant Enhanced Oil Recovery Improves Oil Recovery in a Depleted Eagle Ford Unconventional Well: A Case Study.SPE Journal. SPE-215827-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/215827-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bodini, S.A., Forni, L.P., Tuero, F., Crotti, M.A. and Labayen, I.L. [2018]. Unconventional EOR: Field Tests Results in Vaca Muerte Shale Play: A Capillary Based Improved Oil Recovery Case Study for Shale/Tight Oil Scenarios. SPE-191877-MS, SPE Argentina Exploration and Production of Unconventional Resources Symposium, Neuquen, Argentina, August 2018. https://doi.org/10.2118/191877-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, C., Balhoff, M. and Mohanty, K.K. [2014]. Effect of Reservoir Heterogeneity on Primary Recovery and CO2 Huff ‘n’ Puff Recovery in Shale-Oil Reservoirs.SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 17(3), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.2118/164553-pa.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cronin, M., Emami-Meybodi, H. and Russell, T.J. [2021]. Multicomponent Diffusion Modeling of Cyclic Solvent Injection in Ultratight Reservoirs.SPE J.26 (2021): 1213–1232. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/196008-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. De Groote, M. [1929]. Flooding Process for Recovering Oil From Subterranean Oil-Bearing Strata, US Patent 1823429.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Eide, O., Fermo, M.A., Alcom, Z. and Graue, A. [2016]. Visualization of Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery by Diffusion in Fractured Chalk.SPEJ.21(01), 112–120. Paper Number: SPE-170920-PA https://doi.org/10.2118/170920-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fu, Q., Cudjoe, S., Barati-G, R., Tsau, J. S., Li, X., Peltier, K., Mohrbacher, E., Baldwin, A., Nicoud, B. and Bradford, K. [2021]. Investigating the role of diffusion in hydrocarbon gas huff-n-puff injection — an Eagle Ford study.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 198 (2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gale, J.F.W., Elliot, S.J., Li, J.Z. and Laubach, S.E. [2020]. Natural fracture characterization in the Wolfcamp formation at the hydraulic fracturing test site, Midland Basin, Texas. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Reservoir Technology Conference (URTeC), 2020. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2020-644.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gale, J.F.W., Elliot, S.J., Li and Laubach, S.E. [2018]. Hydraulic fractures in cores from stimulated reservoirs: Core fracture description of HFTs slant core, Midland Basin, West Texas. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC) 2018. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2018-2902624.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gale, W.W. and Sandvik, E.I. [1973]. Tertiary Surfactant Flooding: Petroleum Sulfonate Composition-Efficacy Studies. SPE Journal13(4), 191–199. SPE-3804-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3804-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Ganjdanesh, R., Eltahan, E., Sepehrnoori, K., Drozd, H. and Ambrose, R. [2020]. A field pilot of huff-n-puff gas injection for enhanced oil recovery in Permian Basin, SPE-201622-MS, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Colorado, October 5–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gao, B. and Sharma, M.M. [2013]. A New Family of Anionic Surfactants for Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Applications.SPE Journal18(5), 829–840. SPE-159700-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/159700-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gogarty, W.B. [1983]. Enhanced Oil Recovery Through the Use of Chemicals-Part I.Journal of Petroleum Technology, 35(9), 1581–1590. SPE-12367-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12367-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gogarty, W.B. [1983]. Enhanced Oil Recovery Through the Use of Chemicals-Part 2.Journal of Petroleum Technology, 35(10), 1767–1775. SPE-12368-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12368-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Green, D.W. and Willhite, G.P. [2018]. Chemical Flooding. In Enhanced Oil Recovery, second edition. Chapt. 7. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Grinestaff, G., Barden, C., Miller, J., Franklin, W., Barden, C. and Ding, E. [2020]. Evaluation of Eagle Ford Cyclic Gas Injection EOR: Field Results and Economics.SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference.https://doi.org/10.2118/200427-ms.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Haddad, D.E., Long, H., Agrawal, R. and Harish, T.K. [2023]. Reservoir Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Injection EOR; Insights from Field Trials in the Eagle Ford.Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/ SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, June 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2023-3862004.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Habibi, A., Yassin, M. R., Dehghanpour, H. and Bryan, D. [2017]. Experimental investigation of CO2-oil interactions in tight rocks: A Montney case study.Fuel, 203, 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.077.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hawthorne, S.B., Gorecki, C.D., Sorensen, J.A., Steadman, E.N., Harju, J.A. and Melzer, S. [2013]. Hydrocarbon Mobilization Mechanisms from Upper, Middle, and Lower Bakken Reservoir Rocks Exposed to CO2. https://doi.org/10.2118/167200-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. He, K., Yue, Z., Fan, C. and Xu, L. [2015]. Minimizing Surfactant Adsorption Using Polyelectrolyte Based Sacrificial Agent: A Way to Optimize Surfactant Performance in Unconventional Formations. Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Woodlands, Texas. SPE-173750-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/173750-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hoffman, B.T. [2018]. Huff-n-puff gas injection pilot projects in the Eagle Ford, SPE- 189816-MS, SPE Canada Unconventional Resources Conference, Alberta, March 13–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoffman, B.T. and Reichhardt, D. [2019]. Quantitative evaluation of recovery mechanisms for huff-n-puff gas injection in unconventional reservoirs, URTEC-2019-147-MS, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, July 22–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hyman, J.D., Jimenez-Martinez, J., Viswanathan, H.S., Carey, J. W., Porter, M.L., Rougier, E., Karra, S., Kang, Q., Frash, L., Chen, L., Lei, Z., O’Malley, D. and Makedonska, N. [2016]. Understanding hydraulic fracturing: A multi-scale problem.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0426.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Jin, L., Hawthorne, S., Sorensen, J., Pekot, L., Kurz, B. and Smith, S. et al. [2017]. Extraction of oil from the Bakken shales with supercritical CO2. URTEC-2671596, Presented in the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTEC). Austin, TX, USA, Jul. 24–26; 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kamruzzaman, Asm., Kazemi, H., Kneafsey, T.J., Reagan, M.T. [2022]. Enhanced Oil Recovery Experiments in Wolfcamp Outcrop Cores and Synthetic Cores to Assess Contribution of Pore-scale Processes.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Levitt, D.B., Jackson, A.C., Heinsen, C., Britton, L. N., Malik, T., Dwarakanath, V. and Pope, G.A. [2009]. Identification and Evaluation of High-Performance EOR Surfactants.SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering12(2): 243–253. SPE-100089-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/100089-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Mahzari, P., Mitchell, T.M., Jones, A.P., Oelkers, E.H., Striolo, A., Iacoviello, F., Shearing, P.R. and Juri, J.E. [2020]. Novel laboratory investigation of huff-n-puff gas injection for shale oils under realistic reservoir conditions.Fuel, 284 (2021), 118950.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Moffitt, P., Pecore, D., Trees, M. and Salts, G. [2015]. East Vacuum Grayburg San Andres Unit, 30 Years of CO2 Flooding: Accomplishments, Challenges and Opportunities. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas. SPE-175000-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/175000-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Nelson, R.C., Lawson, J.B. and Thigpen, D.R. [1984]. Cosurfactant-Enhanced Alkaline Flooding. Presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma. SPE-12672-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12672-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Orozco, D., Fragoso, A., Selvan, K. and Aguilera, R. [2018]. Eagle Ford Huff-and-Puff Gas Injection Pilot: Comparison of Reservoir Simulation, Material Balance and Real Performance of the Pilot Well.SPE-191575-MS, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, September 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/191575-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Reisberg, J. and Doscher, T.M. [1956]. Interfacial Phenomena in Crude-Oil-Water Systems, Producers Monthly, 20 (1956), 28–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Rognmo, A.U., Fredriksen, S.B., Alcorn, Z.P., Sharma, M., Føyen, T., Eide, Ø., Graue, A. and Fernø, M. [2019]. Pore-to-Core EOR Upscaling for CO2 Foam for CCUS.SPE Journal24(6), 2793–2803. SPE-190869-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/190869-PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Sahni, V. [2009]. Experimental Evaluation of Co-solvents in Development of High-Performance Alkali/Surfactant/Polymer Formulations for Enhanced Oil Recovery, M.S. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Salahshoor, S. and Ciezobka, J. [2020]. Hydraulic fracturing test site HFTS Phase-2 EOR pilot: Huff-and-puff pilot in the Permian-Midland Basin, SPE-200468-MS, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, April 18–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Sanchez-Rivera, D., Mohanty, K. and Balhoff, M. [2015]. Reservoir simulation and optimization of Huff-and-Puff operations in the Bakken Shale.Fuel, 147, 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.062.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Shuler, P.J., Lu, Z., Ma, Q. and Tang, Y. [2016]. Surfactant Huff-n-Puff Application Potentials for Unconventional Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, Oklahoma. SPE-179667-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/179667-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Song, C. and Yang, D. [2017]. Experimental and numerical evaluation of CO2 huff ‘n’ puff processes in Bakken formation.Fuel, 2017. 190, 145–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sorensen, J.A. and Hamling, J.A. [2016]. Historical Bakken Test Data Provide Critical Insights On EOR In Tight Oil Plays.American Oil and Gas Reporter.https://www.aogr.com/magazine/cover-story/historical-bakken-test-data-provide-critical-insights-on-eor-in-tight-oil-p.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Thomas, F.B., Piwowar, M., Noroozi, M., Gibb, W., Marin, J. and Zhang, H. [2020]. Insight gained from experimental gas-cycling EOR in the unconventional Montney and Duvernay formations, SPE-200359-MS, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, April 18–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Tian, Y., Uzun, O., Shen, Y., Lei, Z., Yuan, J., Chen, J., Kazemi, H. and Wu, Y. [2020]. Feasibility study of gas injection in low permeability reservoirs of Changqing oilfield, Fuel, 274, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Torcuk, M.A., Uzun, O., Padin, A. and Kazemi, H. [2019]. Impact of Chemical Osmosis on Brine Imbibition and Hydrocarbon Recovery in Liquid-Rich Shale Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Calgary, Canada. SPE-195909-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/195909-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. U.S. Energy Information Administration. [2023]. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQS): How much shale (tight) oil is produced in the United States — Independent Statistics and Analysis.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Uzun, O., Torcuk, M.A. and Kazemi, H. [2020]. Enhanced Oil Recovery for Liquid-Rich Unconventional Shale Reservoirs Using Low-Salinity Surfactant and Wettability Altering Dilute Surfactants. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Virtual. SPE-200346-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/200346-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Uzun, O., Kazemi, H. and Sonnenberg, S.A. [2022]. Wettability in Niobrara, Codell, Eagle Ford, Bakken, and Wolfcamp Formations: For EOR and CCUS Applications. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas. URTEC-3711095-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2022-3711095
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Uzun, I., Eker, E. and Kazemi, H. [2018]. An Efficient Compositional Model for Unconventional Reservoirs: Eagle Ford Formation Case Study. SPE-190136-MS, Western Regional Meeting, Garden Grove, California, USA, 22–27 April 2018
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Uzun, O. [2023]. Production Performance of Permian Basin Wells and Potential for Improving Oil Recovery. PhD dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, December 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Uzun, O., Kazemi, H., Sonnenberg, S.A. and Zerpa, L.E. [2024]. Potential for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Permian Wolfcamp and Elsewhere. URTeC: 4044579, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, June 17–19, 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Yang, H. [2010]. Development of Improved ASP Formulation for Reactive and Non-reactive Crude Oils, MS Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Walker, D.L. [2011]. Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Increasing the Temperature of ASP Flooding, M.S. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, M., Abeykoon, G.A., Argüelles-Vivas, F.A. and Okuno, R. [2019]. Novel Wettability Modifiers for Improved Oil Recovery in Tight Oil Reservoirs. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado. URTEC-2019-1069-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2019-1069.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, M., Baek, K.H., Abeykoon, G.A., Argüelles-Vivas, F.A., and Okuno, R. [2019]. Oxygenated Solvent as a Novel Additive for Improved Oil Recovery in Tight Oil Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Calgary, Canada. SPE-195871-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/195871-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Washburn, E.W.The dynamics of capillary flow, Phys. Rev.17(3) (1921) 273–283, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.17.273.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Yu, W., Sepehrnoori, K. [2018]. Shale Gas and Tight Oil Reservoir Simulation, 1st ed.;Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhang, F., Saputra, I.W., Adel, I.A. and Schechter, D.S. [2019]. Numerical Investigation of EOR Applications in Unconventional Liquid Reservoirs through Surfactant-Assisted Spontaneous Imbibition SASI and Gas Injection Following Primary Depletion.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.https://doi.org/10.2118/196055-ms.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhao, P., Jackson, A.C., Britton, C. and Pope, G.A. [2008]. Development of High-Performance Surfactants for Difficult Oils. Presented at the SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma. SPE-113432-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/113432-MS.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Zeng, T., Miller, C.S. and Mohanty, K.K. [2020]. Combination of a chemical blend with CO2 huff-n-puff for enhanced oil recovery in oil shales.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 194, 107546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107546.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024078
Loading
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques in Low Permeability Unconventional Shale Reservoirs
First Break 42, 79 (2024); https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024078
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024078
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024078
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error